Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making the distinction between water scarcity and drought using an observation‐modeling framework

Open access
Van Loon, A. F., Van Lanen, H. A. J.·2013·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Key Points: Observation‐modeling framework is needed to discern water scarcity and drought. Anomaly analysis on observed and naturalized time series allows quantification. In a case study, water scarcity had a four times higher impact than drought.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wrcr.20147

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Van Loon, A. F., & Van Lanen, H. A. J.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2013-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
1483-1502
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W1520842651
Cited by
291
References
68
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making the distinction between water scarcity and drought using an observation‐modeling framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wrcr.20147
The paper
Van Loon, A. F., & Van Lanen, H. A. J. (2013). Making the distinction between water scarcity and drought using an observation‐modeling framework. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20147

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.