The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A quantile function approach to discharge estimation from satellite altimetry (ENVISAT)
Abstract
The publicly available global discharge database is limited in spatial and temporal coverage. Although regional exceptions exist, the population of the database has declined over the past several years. As discharge is one of the most important parameters for modeling hydrological interactions, alternative measuring techniques must be sought. In the recent past, satellite altimetry has been investigated as an alternative for monitoring inland water level. In the present study, altimetry footprints in the vicinity of river gauging stations for the Amazon, Amur, Brahmaputra, Danube, Don, Mekong, Niger, Ob, and Vistula rivers are analyzed for a functional relationship between the water level measurements from altimetry and discharge from the gauging stations. Such a functional relationship is conventionally established via a rating curve computed using simultaneous data. This study proposes a statistical approach based on quantile functions to infer this functional relation without the need for having synchronous data sets. The statistical approach provides the opportunity of extracting discharge values from altimetry data for rivers like the Mekong, Brahmaputra, Don, and Vistula for which the discharge measurements at the selected gauges were made before the age of satellites. The algorithm is then validated over those rivers which do have discharge measurements available within periods of altimetry. Our validation shows that our algorithm is in the same quality range as the conventional approach. We are thus able to salvage presatellite altimetry discharge data and turn them into active use for the satellite altimetry time frame.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the absence of such overlap (for almost 93 percent of all virtual stations in this study), a quantile-based method was used51, called the Quantile Quantile Rating Curve (QQRC).”
From Global scale river discharge and mean depth from radar altimetry and model (2026) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit
Massey, F. J. (1951) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769 · Cited by 7,210
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1126/science.1089802 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/2006RG000197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/2005GL022814 · doi:10.1029/2005gl022814
- Birkett C. M.(1995) The global remote sensing of lakes wetlands and rivers for hydrological and climate research in International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '95) on Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications' vol.3 pp.1979–1981 IEEE Firenze doi:10.1109/IGARSS.1995.524084. · doi:10.1109/igarss.1995.524084
- 10.1029/2001JD000609 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0022‐1694(03)00129‐X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.crte.2006.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/97GL00809 · DOI
- 10.1029/2003WR002543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.crte.2006.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.asr.2011.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.rse.2010.04.020 · DOI · Paper page
- Fekete B. M. andC. J.Vörösmarty(2007) The current status of global river discharge monitoring and potential new technologies complementing traditional discharge measurements in Predictions in Ungauged Basins: PUB Kick‐Off Proceedings of the PUB Kick‐Off Meeting Held in Brasilia 20–22 November 2002 IAHS Publ. 309 129–136.
- 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.027 · DOI
- 10.1029/2007JD009438 · DOI
- Fu L.‐L. andA.Cazenave(2001) Satellite Altimetry and Earth Sciences: A Handbook of Techniques and Applications Int. Geophys. Ser 69 Academic Press Calif.
- 10.5194/hessd‐9‐7591‐2012 · doi:10.5194/hessd-9-7591-2012
- 10.1201/9781420035919 · doi:10.1201/9781420035919
- 10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5194/hess‐15‐1729‐2011 · DOI
- 10.1029/2006GL025767 · doi:10.1029/2006gl025767
- 10.1029/2009JC006075 · doi:10.1029/2009jc006075
- 10.1109/LGRS.2011.2174958 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004GL020478 · doi:10.1029/2004gl020478
- 10.1016/j.crte.2005.10.003 · doi:10.1016/j.crte.2005.10.003
Cited by
Soil salinization management for sustainable development: A review
Singh, A. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111383 · Cited by 533
Global scale river discharge and mean depth from radar altimetry and model
Paris, A., Garambois, P.-A., Gal, L., Cerbelaud, A., Larnier, K., David, C. H., Jucá Oliveira, R. A., Correa, S. W., Tourian, M. J., & Calmant, S. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-78275-5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tourian, M. J., Sneeuw, N., & Bárdossy, A.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Geodesy, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering and Geodesy, University of Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany
- Department of Hydrology and Geohydrology, Institute for Modelling Hydraulic and Environmental Systems Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4174-4186
- ISSN
- 0043-1397
- 1944-7973
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- DFG (SN 13/1-3, BA 1150/11-3)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantile function approach to discharge estimation from satellite altimetry (ENVISAT). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wrcr.20348
- The paper
- Tourian, M. J., Sneeuw, N., & Bárdossy, A. (2013). A quantile function approach to discharge estimation from satellite altimetry (ENVISAT). Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.