Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving computational efficiency in global river models by implementing the local inertial flow equation and a vector‐based river network map

Open access
Yamazaki, Dai, de Almeida, Gustavo A. M., Bates, Paul D.·2013·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Global river models are an essential tool for both earth system studies and water resources assessments. As advanced physical processes have been implemented in global river models, increasing computational cost has become problematic for executing ensemble or long‐term simulations. To improve computational efficiency, we here propose the use of a local inertial flow equation combined with a vector‐based river network map. A local inertial equation, a simplified formulation of the shallow water equations, was introduced to replace a diffusion wave equation. A vector‐based river network map which flexibly discretizes river segments was adopted in order to replace the traditional grid‐based map which is based on a Cartesian grid coordinate system. The computational efficiency of the proposed flow routing and river network map was tested by executing hydrodynamic simulations with the CaMa‐Flood global river model. The simulation results suggest that the computational efficiency can be improved by more than 300% by applying the local inertial equation. It can be improved by a further 60% by implementing the vector‐based river network map instead of a grid‐based map. It is found that the vector‐based map with evenly distributed flow distances between calculation units allows longer time steps compared to the grid‐based map because the latter has very short flow distances between calculation units at high latitudes which critically limit time step length. Considering the improvement in simulation speed, the local inertial equation, and a vector‐based river network map are preferable in global hydrodynamic simulations with high computational demands such as ensemble or long‐term experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wrcr.20552

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Yamazaki, D., de Almeida, G. A. M., & Bates, P. D.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2013-11
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
7221-7235
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W1846570231
Cited by
276
References
46
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving computational efficiency in global river models by implementing the local inertial flow equation and a vector‐based river network map. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wrcr.20552
The paper
Yamazaki, D., de Almeida, G. A. M., & Bates, P. D. (2013). Improving computational efficiency in global river models by implementing the local inertial flow equation and a vector‐based river network map. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20552

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.