The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model
Abstract
Current global river routing models do not represent floodplain inundation dynamics realistically because the storage and movement of surface waters are regulated by small‐scale topography rather than the commonly used spatial resolution of global models. In this study, we propose a new global river routing model, CaMa‐Flood, which explicitly parameterizes the subgrid‐scale topography of a floodplain, thus describing floodplain inundation dynamics. The relationship between water storage, water level, and flooded area in the model is decided on the basis of the subgrid‐scale topographic parameters based on 1 km resolution digital elevation model. Horizontal water transport is calculated with a diffusive wave equation, which realizes the backwater effect in flat river basins. A set of global‐scale river flow simulations demonstrated an improved predictability of daily‐scale river discharge in many major world rivers by incorporating the floodplain inundation dynamics. Detailed analysis of the simulated results for the Amazon River suggested that introduction of the diffusive wave equation is essential for simulating water surface elevation realistically. The simulated spatiotemporal variation of the flooded area in the Amazon basin showed a good correlation with satellite observations, especially when the backwater effect was considered. The improved predictability for daily river discharge, water surface elevation, and inundated areas by the proposed model will promote climate system studies and water resource assessments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global hydrological cycles and world water resources
Oki, T., & Kanae, S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128845 · Cited by 4,392
Self-citationNew Global Hydrography Derived from Spaceborne Elevation Data
Lehner, B., Verdin, K., & Jarvis, A. (2008) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/2008eo100001 · Cited by 2,411
Validation of surface height from shuttle radar topography mission using shuttle laser altimeter
Sun, G., Ranson, K. J., Kharuk, V. I., & Kovacs, K. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.001 · Cited by 233
Cited by
Lehner, B., & Grill, G. (2013) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.9740 · Cited by 2,193
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,456
Neal, J., Schumann, G., & Bates, P. (2012) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2012wr012514 · Cited by 517
Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions
Bierkens, M. F. P. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017173 · Cited by 493
The SWOT Mission and Its Capabilities for Land Hydrology
Biancamaria, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Pavelsky, T. M. (2016) · Surveys in Geophysics · doi:10.1007/s10712-015-9346-y · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H., & Oki, T.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1543844559
- Cited by
- 932
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2010wr009726
- The paper
- Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H., & Oki, T. (2011). A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009726
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.