The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visible and thermal infrared remote sensing for the detection of white‐tailed deer using an unmanned aerial system
Abstract
Wildlife management is based on various measurements representative of the health of populations and their habitats. Some agencies are focusing on animal surveys to manage species such as white‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ). Current survey methods are faced with the challenge of reduced operating costs as well as estimating and correcting detection biases. Our pilot study (data collected on 6 Nov 2012 at Saint‐David‐de‐Falardeau, QC, Canada) assessed the potential of a new approach detect and count deer based on visible and thermal infrared image processing at very‐high spatial resolutions using an unmanned aerial system (UAS). Supervised and unsupervised pixel‐based image classification approaches as well as object‐based image analysis (OBIA) were assessed for different spatial resolutions and with different combinations of spectral bands. None of the pixel‐based approaches were effective for detecting deer. The OBIA approach detected deer with a rate of up to 100% under the best conditions by using a combination of visible and thermal infrared imagery at a spatial resolution of 0.8 cm/pixel. Overall, this approach had an average detection rate of 0.5, which is comparable to conventional aerial surveys. Visual obstructions by coniferous canopy and the spectral confusion associated with certain elements (e.g., bare soil, rocks) are problems that remain unresolved. Using UASs with image processing for surveys of deer and other species of large mammals is promising, but currently limited by the flight range of unmanned aerial vehicles and the associated regulations. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future
Jiménez López, J., & Mulero-Pázmány, M. (2019) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones3010010 · Cited by 300
Networked Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Surveillance and Monitoring: A Survey
Li, X., & Savkin, A. V. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13070174 · Cited by 107
Terrestrial mammalian wildlife responses to Unmanned Aerial Systems approaches
Bennitt, E., Bartlam-Brooks, H. L. A., Hubel, T. Y., & Wilson, A. M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38610-x · Cited by 85
Schroeder, N. M., Panebianco, A., Gonzalez Musso, R., & Carmanchahi, P. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.191482 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Chrétien, L., Théau, J., & Ménard, P.
- Venue
- Wildlife Society Bulletin
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-02-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-191
- ISSN
- 2328-5540 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323722282
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visible and thermal infrared remote sensing for the detection of white‐tailed deer using an unmanned aerial system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wsb.629
- The paper
- Chrétien, L., Théau, J., & Ménard, P. (2016). Visible and thermal infrared remote sensing for the detection of white‐tailed deer using an unmanned aerial system. Wildlife Society Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.