Cited by 165Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesMuseums and Cultural HeritageWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Effect of felid activity on zoo visitor interest

Margulis, Susan W., Hoyos, Catalina, Anderson, Meegan·2003·Zoo Biology

Abstract

The extent to which the presence of zoo visitors influences animal behavior, and the ways in which animal activity influences visitor interest and perception, are of great interest to zoological parks. Visitors have been variously characterized as being enriching for zoo animals, as being stressors, and generally as influencing behavior in measurable ways. Most studies have focused on primates, and have assumed a “visitor effect” paradigm (i.e., visitors influence animal behavior). Here we present findings from a study of a nonprimate group (felids), and examine the “visitor attraction” model, which assumes that visitors are attracted to active animals. We assessed visitor interest and number at seven cat exhibits at the Brookfield Zoo during the spring and summer of 2002. Data were collected during 1‐min scans of each exhibit at 10‐min intervals. The results indicate that visitor presence per se did not influence cat activity, and that visitor interest was generally greater when cats were active. Various species differences may be explained by visitor familiarity with the species, variations in exhibit design, and species‐specific activity budgets. We conclude that the visitor attraction model may be more appropriate for taxa, such as large cats, that tend naturally to be largely inactive and to respond little (if at all) to visitor disturbances or efforts to engage. The relationship must be viewed as bidirectional: visitors influence animal behavior, and animal behavior inf…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.10115

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 165

Authors
Margulis, S. W., Hoyos, C., & Anderson, M.
Affiliations
  • Brookfield Zoo Chicago (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Margulis, Susan W.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
587-599
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W2024875310
Cited by
165
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
zoo animal behavior, visitor effects, Felidae, animal activity, zoo exhibits, Brookfield Zoo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review