The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Descriptive accounts of the behavior of breeding and nonbreeding pairs of golden‐bellied mangabeys (Cercocebus galeritus chrysogaster)
Abstract
Four adult heterosexual pairs of golden‐bellied mangabeys (Cercocebus galeritus chrysogaster) were observed at the Sacramento Zoo. The behaviors of the pairs differed with the histories of the individuals involved, degrees of swelling of the females, presence of offspring in their cages, and the nature of distractions near their enclosures. Young wild‐born adults without a nursing‐aged infant displayed sexual behavior and observer‐directed threats. Experienced wild‐born breeders with nursing‐aged infants and older juveniles showed intense interest in the sexual behavior of the young pair. These breeders displayed mild aggression, both protective and punitive, toward the juveniles and the infant living with them. Captive and abnormally behaving adults displayed self‐biting, bizarre postures, and other stress‐related behaviors as well as large amounts of visitor‐directed aggression. An experienced breeder male paired with the captive female was unable to achieve copulation. To reduce stress in these and other relatively aggressive primate species, careful attention should be paid to housing location, social history, stage of estrus, and presence of offspring.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although their readiness to threaten humans is perhaps related to their 'emotionally volatile' nature, the circumstances and forms of threat are probably more consistent with the ecological and behavioural characteristics of this species in the wild: such as being, 'robust, sexually dimorphic, semiterrestrial. ..in troops of 13-36 with one or more males, peripheral males, and solitaries' (Mitchell”
From Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect? (2000) · cites this paper as Mitchell et al 1987
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1530/jrf.0.0620475 · DOI
- 10.1159/000155158 · DOI
- 10.1159/000155330 · DOI
- Michael R. P., 1971, Comparative reproduction of nonhuman primates, 205
- Mitchell G., 1987, Goldenbellied mangabeys (Cercocebus galeritus chrysogaster) at the Sacramento Zoo: Adult heterosexual pairs, Zoo biology, 6
- Oates J. F., 1986, ACTION PLAN FOR AFRICAN PRIMATE CONSERVATION
- 10.1159/000155296 · DOI
- Taylor S., 1983, Sacramento Zoo—Recipient of outstanding breeding award, Sacramento zoological society bulletin, 20, 3
- 10.1007/BF02743755 · DOI
- Zuckerman S., 1937, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON, The duration and phases of the menstrual cycle in primates., 107, 315
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect?
Hosey, G. R. (2000) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600022946 · Cited by 249
Factors influencing the behaviour and welfare of captive lion-tailed macaques in Indian zoos
Mallapur, A., Waran, N., & Sinha, A. (2005) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.10.002 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, G., Soteriou, S., Towers, S., Kenney, L., & Schumer, C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mitchell, G.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391-399
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W1969491108
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- sexual behavior, estrus, maternal aggression, self-directed aggression, stress behavior, social history, zoo animal welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Descriptive accounts of the behavior of breeding and nonbreeding pairs of golden‐bellied mangabeys (Cercocebus galeritus chrysogaster). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/zoo.1430060413
- The paper
- Mitchell, G., Soteriou, S., Towers, S., Kenney, L., & Schumer, C. (1987). Descriptive accounts of the behavior of breeding and nonbreeding pairs of golden‐bellied mangabeys (Cercocebus galeritus chrysogaster). Zoo Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430060413