Cited by 249Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect?

Open access
Hosey, G R·2000·Animal Welfare

Abstract

The presence of human visitors has been shown to affect the behaviour of several different mammalian species in a number of different zoos, but the behavioural changes observed are not always consistent with a simple ‘stressful influence’ explanation. Data for non-primate species are too sparse to draw meaningful conclusions; but for primates, the evidence reviewed in this paper allows several hypotheses to be tested. Neither a social facilitation nor an audience attraction hypothesis can be generally supported by the available studies. However, these studies are consistent with a general stressful influence hypothesis, although the extent of this influence is itself affected by other variables, notably species and housing differences. There is some evidence that chronic exposure to human audiences may lessen this stressful influence in some species; and in certain circumstances (notably where some members of the public throw food) the effect of the audience is almost an enriching one.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0962728600022946

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of visitors on the welfare of captive animals has been widely studied for more than four decades.

    “While the effect of visitors on the welfare of captive animals has been widely studied for more than four decades (Hosey, 2000;Davey, 2007;Hosey, 2013)”

    From Effect of weather conditions and presence of visitors on adrenocortical activity in captive African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2017) · cites this paper as Hosey, 2000

    The Introduction says the visitor effect was not systematically investigated until comparatively recently, rather than widely studied for more than four decades. The Non-primate studies section also describes published studies of visitor effects on non-primates as virtually non-existent. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hosey described the term 'visitor effect' in reference to the study on the impacts of zoo visitors, with systematic investigations largely beginning in the late 1980s and 1990s and growing over time.

    “Hosey [44] described the term ‘visitor effect’ in reference to the study on the impacts of zoo visitors on animals, with systematic investigations into this topic largely beginning in the late 1980s and 1990s and growing over time.”
  • It may be that animal behaviour is influencing visitor numbers at enclosures, rather than visitors influencing animals.

    “It is also worthy to note that it may actually be the case that animal behaviour is influencing visitor numbers at enclosures, rather than visitors influencing animals [15,44,73].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Clarke A S and Mason W A 1988 Differences among three macaque species in responsiveness to an observer. International Journal of Primatology 9: 347-364
  2. Hediger H 1970 Man and Animal in the Zoo. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, UK
  3. Maki S, Alford P L and Bramblett C 1987 The effects of unfamiliar humans on aggression in captive chimpanzee groups. American Journal of Primatology 12: 358 (Abstract)
  4. Mather L 1999 Response of Captive Orang Utans to Human Audiences. Unpublished MPhil thesis, University of Manchester (Bolton Institute), Bolton, UK
  5. Wormell D, Brayshaw M, Price E and Herron S 1996 Pied tamarins Saguinus bicolor bicolor at the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust: management, behaviour and reproduction. Dodo Journal of the Wildlife Preservation Trusts 32: 76-97 Zajonc RBI 965 Social facilitation. Science 149: 269-274

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosey, G. R.
Affiliations
University of Greater Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Hosey, G R
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2000-11
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
343-357
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W3144779167
Cited by
249
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
zoo animals, visitor effects, animal behavior, stress, primates, social facilitation, long-term exposure, housing conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review