Strategic collection planning: Theory and practice
Abstract
Strategic collection planning is a relatively new concept for zoos. Until recently, personal preference, availability, and competition determined which species or subspecies were acquired. In the last few years, however, there have been attempts to employ systematic criteria for taxon selection that better serve conservation objectives. Planning currently occurs at three levels: global, regional, and institutional. The current planning process is reviewed and recommendations are made for ways the process might be improved. An efficient, economical, and effective collection planning process is critical if modern, professionally managed zoological institutions are to make a significant impact on wildlife and ecosystem conservation. Rather than selecting taxa solely on the possibility of a future reintroduction, serious consideration should be given to the ability of a species or subspecies to contribute to more immediate conservation goals, including public education, fund raising to support field conservation, and scientific research. Because resources are limited, perhaps zoos should focus their long‐term breeding programs primarily on flagship species—that is, those that have the potential to excite public attention and help to protect habitat and other taxa—rather than on a broad array of species that are currently endangered. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collection planning is often categorised by continents due to its easy navigation.
“Collection planning is often categorised by continents due to its easy navigation”
From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Hutchins & et al., 1995
Housing suitable, naturally associated species would benefit as it would occupy less space than housing individually.
“housing suitable, naturally associated species would benefit as it would occupy less space than housing individually (Hutchins & et al., 1995;Brereton & Brereton, 2020).”
From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Hutchins & et al., 1995
Given limited space, budgets, and expertise, allocating resources toward genetic dead ends undermines broader conservation capacity.
“Given limited space, budgets, and expertise, allocating resources toward genetic dead ends undermines broader conservation capacity [3].”
From Tiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
No Room at the Zoo: Management euthanasia and animal welfare
Browning, H. (2018) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-018-9741-8 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria
Green, H., Palmer, G. A., & Brereton, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities · doi:10.56397/jrssh.2022.12.02 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Collection planning is often categorised by continents due to its easy navigation so housing suitable, naturally associated species would benefit as it would occupy less space than housing individually (Hutchins & et al., 1995; Brereton & Brereton, 2020).”
BackgroundTiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns
Erzinçlioğlu, T. S., Piaz, M. T., Chinpilas, T., Hunnestad, A. V., Godfrey, L., & Fourage, A. (2026) · Discover Animals · doi:10.1007/s44338-026-00163-5
- Authors
- Hutchins, M., Willis, K., & Wiese, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Association of Zoos and Aquariums (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hutchins, Michael
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-25
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2142250253
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 21.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- zoos, captive breeding programs, flagship species, wildlife conservation, public education, threatened species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review