The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Voluntary exposure of some western‐hemisphere snake and lizard species to ultraviolet‐B radiation in the field: how much ultraviolet‐B should a lizard or snake receive in captivity?
Abstract
Studies of voluntary exposure to ultraviolet‐B (UVB) radiation from the sun in the field were conducted in the southern US and Jamaica for 15 species of lizards and snakes occupying various habitats. Species were sorted into four zones of UVB exposure ranging from a median UV index of 0.35 for zone 1 to 3.1 for zone 4. Guidelines for UVB exposure in captivity of these and species occupying similar light environments are presented. Data for most species were collected during mid‐day during the spring breeding season, which appeared to be the time of maximum exposure. For two species of Sceloporus studied more intensively there was significant variation of exposure among times of the day and among seasons. So, all‐day studies over the entire active season are necessary to fully understand the pattern of natural exposure for a particular diurnal species. Environmental and body temperature and thermoregulation as well as UVB/vitamin D photoregulation influences exposure to UVB. Regressions allowing the inter‐conversion of readings among some meters with different detector sensitivities are presented. Readings of natural sunlight predict the same photobiosynthetic potential for vitamin D as the same reading from artificial sources whose wavelength distribution within the UVB band of the source is comparable to that of sunlight. Research approaches to further increase our understanding of vitamin D and UVB use and requirements for squamate reptiles in captivity are outlined. Zoo Biol 29:317–334, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MacLaughlin, J. A., Anderson, R. R., & Holick, M. F. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6281884 · Cited by 539
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.2460/ajvr.67.12.2046 · DOI
- 10.2460/ajvr.69.2.294 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-5051-8_17 · DOI
- Aucone BM, 2003, Comparison of two artificial ultraviolet light sources used for chuckwalla (Sauromalus obesus) husbandry, J Herpatol Med Surg, 13, 14
- Auffenberg W, 1988, Gray's monitor lizard
- Bernard JS, 1991, The response of vitamin D deficient green iguanas (Iguana iguana) to artificial ultraviolet light, Proc Am Vet, 1991, 147
- Blair WF, 1960, The rusty lizard
- 10.1093/icb/38.6.799 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00359-005-0014-4 · DOI
- Brames H, 2007, Aspects of light and reptile immunity, Iguana, 14, 18
- 10.1002/zoo.20148 · DOI
- 10.1643/0045-8511(2000)2000[0245:POAAFU]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0955-2863(90)90067-U · DOI
- Chen TC, 1993, Biologic effects of light 1993, 28
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1997)16:5<391::AID-ZOO2>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
- 10.2307/1565054 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(1996)15:3<279::AID-ZOO7>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/zoo.10054 · DOI
- 10.1086/374276 · DOI
- 10.1086/427055 · DOI
- 10.1038/365397a0 · DOI
- Gehrmann WH, 2006, Reptile medicine and surgery,, 463
- 10.1002/zoo.20014 · DOI
- Gehrmann WH, 2004, A comparison of vitamin D‐synthesizing ability of different light sources to irradiances measured with a Solarmeter model 6.2 UVB meter, Herpetol Rev, 35, 361
- 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:6<495::AID-ZOO2>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
- Haddad JG, 1999, Vitamin D: physiology, molecular biology, and clinical applications, 101
- Hays J, 1995, Differences in DNA repair activity and sensitivity to UVB light among egg and oocytes of declining and stable amphibian species, J Cell Biochem, 1995, 296
- Hibma J, 2004, Dietary vitamin D3 and UV‐B exposure effects on green iguana growth rate: is full‐spectrum lighting necessary?, Bull Chicago Herpetol Soc, 39, 145
- Holick MF, 1989, Science and animals: addressing contemporary issues, 63
- Holick MF, 1989, Vertebrate endocrinology fundamentals and biomedical implications, Vol. 3. Regulation of calcium and phosphate, 7
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-2861-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajcn/79.3.362 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3124 · DOI
- Jones JR, 1996, Biological effects of light 1995, 49
- 10.1086/597525 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0305-0491(99)00081-4 · DOI
- 10.1638/1042-7260(2001)032[0342:TRFNST]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Legler JM, 1979, The application of stomach‐flushing to lizards and anurans, Herpetologica, 35, 107
- Lindgren J, 2008, Measuring effective vitamin D3‐producing ultraviolet B radiation using Solartech's Solarmeter 6.4 handheld, UVB radiometer, Bull Chicago Herpetol Soc, 43, 57
- Loew ER, 2002, Visual pigments and oil droplets in diurnal lizards: a comparative study of Caribbean anoles, J Exp Biol, 205, 927, 10.1242/jeb.205.7.927 · DOI
- Lu Z, 1992, Biologic effects of light, 48, 10.1515/9783110856156-007 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02556316 · DOI
- 10.1086/physzool.69.2.30164194 · DOI
- 10.2307/1942325 · DOI
- 10.1638/04-080.1 · DOI
- Tian XQ, 1996, Biologic effects of light 1995, 39
- Wallach JD, 1996, Hypervitaminosis D in green iguanas, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 149, 912
- Watters JL, 2008, Comparison of two diet collection methods in the lizards Sceloporus jarrovii and Sceloporus virgatus, Herpetol Rev, 39, 307
- 10.1210/jcem-68-5-882 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.018 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Godke, A., Rhim, H., Aguilar, M. G., Marrero-Acosta, K., & Mitchell, M. A. (2025) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci12100965
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferguson, G. W., Brinker, A. M., Gehrmann, W. H., Bucklin, S. E., Baines, F. M., & Mackin, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Texas Christian University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ferguson, Gary W.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-29
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-334
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2103224610
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eppley Foundation for Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- UV-B radiation, snakes, lizards, squamate reptiles, captive husbandry, UV index, Sceloporus, diurnal activity patterns, seasonal variation, body temperature, thermoregulation, artificial lighting
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Body Temperature, Ergosterol, Jamaica, Lizards, Regression Analysis, Snakes, Species Specificity, Sunlight, Ultraviolet Rays, United States, Vitamin D, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review