Identifying parentage using molecular markers: Improving accuracy of studbook records for a captive flock of marabou storks (Leptoptilus crumeniferus): Identifying Parentage of Marabou Storks
Open accessAbstract
Extra-pair copulations (EPCs) leading to extra-pair fertilization (EPF) are common in avian mating systems, despite the prevalence of observed social monogamy in many species. Colonially breeding birds are interesting species to investigate the prevalence of EPCs and EPF because they show nesting habits including close proximity of nest sites and sexual partners, which are proposed to promote alternative reproductive tactics. Endemic to Africa, the colonial marabou stork (Leptoptilos crumeniferus) is one of the most commonly held avian species in North American zoos. The aims of this study were to use genetic information to verify parentage in a population of marabou stork housed at Disney's Animal Kingdom® based on five microsatellite loci and to investigate reproductive behavior. We compared genetic analyses of parents and offspring to studbook data collected through behavioral observations of parental behavior at the nest. Using genetic analyses to reconstruct the pedigree of the marabou stork flock using the program COLONY led to improvement of studbook records by determining parentage of an individual that had previously unknown parentage, and identified one individual that had a sire that differed genetically from studbook records. An important contribution of our analyses was the identification and verification of the most likely parents for offspring hatched in this colony and improving incorrect or undocumented parentage in the studbook. Additionally, the colonial nature of this species makes it difficult to observe and understand reproductive behavior. Gaining better understanding of the mating system of a species is essential for successful breeding and captive management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Molecular methods have the valuable ability to indisputably exclude relationships when mismatched genetic markers are found between offspring and presumed parents recorded in a studbook.
“Molecular methods have the valuable ability to indisputably exclude relationships when mismatched genetic markers are found between offspring and presumed parents recorded in a studbook (Ferrie et al. 2013).”
From Molecular Genetics Unveiled Unknown Family Relationships and Hybrids in an Ex-Situ Colony of African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2018) · cites this paper as Ferrie et al. 2013
The abstract (page not given in our copy) reports that genetic analysis identified a marabou stork whose sire differed from the studbook record. This supports using molecular markers to challenge recorded parentage, but the available passage does not establish that marker mismatches indisputably exclude a relationship. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPedigree analysis by molecular tools can help decision makers detect missing and incorrect information, overall improving breeding programs.
“In such cases, pedigree analysis by molecular tools can help decision makers to detect missing and incorrect information, overall improving breeding programs (Ivy and Lacy 2010;Ferrie et al. 2013).”
From Molecular Genetics Unveiled Unknown Family Relationships and Hybrids in an Ex-Situ Colony of African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2018) · cites this paper as Ferrie et al. 2013
Knowledge of the frequency of extra-pair paternity in colonially nesting species may have implications for the genetic management of captive avian populations.
“Knowledge of the frequency of extra-pair paternity in colonially nesting species may have implications for the genetic management of captive avian populations (Ferrie et al. 2013).”
From Molecular Genetics Unveiled Unknown Family Relationships and Hybrids in an Ex-Situ Colony of African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2018) · cites this paper as Ferrie et al. 2013
Previous studies proved that the FL method is the most accurate and that COLONY outperforms other commonly used software in carrying out parentage analysis.
“Actually, previous studies proved that the FL method is the most accurate (Wang 2004(Wang , 2012;;Wang and Santure 2009) and that COLONY outperforms other commonly used software in carrying out parentage analysis (Wang 2012;Ferrie et al. 2013;Harrison et al. 2013).”
From Molecular Genetics Unveiled Unknown Family Relationships and Hybrids in an Ex-Situ Colony of African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2018) · cites this paper as Ferrie et al. 2013
The indexed study summary (page not provided) says COLONY helped reconstruct parentage and improve the marabou stork studbook. It does not compare COLONY with other parentage-analysis software; searches for software comparisons and relative accuracy found no such passage. The separate FL-method claim is attributed to other citations, not Ferrie et al. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modesto, P., Biolatti, C., Favaro, L., Colussi, S., Peletto, S., Piga, S., Riina, M. V., Pessani, D., Trincas, E., Isaja, V., et al. (2018) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esy032 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ferrie, G. M., Cohen, O. R., Schutz, P., Leighty, K. A., Plasse, C., Bettinger, T. L., & Hoffman, E. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Walt Disney (United States) (US)
- Animals, Science and Environment; Disney's Animal Kingdom®, Walt Disney World Resort; Lake Buena Vista; Florida
- Corresponding author
- Ferrie, Gina M.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-19
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 556-564
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105900164
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Central Florida
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- marabou stork, parentage verification, extra-pair copulation, extra-pair paternity, microsatellite markers, pedigree reconstruction, colonies, captive breeding, mating systems, social monogamy, alternative reproductive tactics, zoo animal management
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Zoo, Birds, Breeding, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Pedigree, Sexual Behavior, Animal, DNA Primers, Microsatellite Repeats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review