Molecular Genetics Unveiled Unknown Family Relationships and Hybrids in an Ex-Situ Colony of African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus)
Open accessAbstract
Genealogical relationships among colony members, inbreeding status, and presence of hybrids are crucial data that can assist zoo curators in captive colony management and decision-making on relocation for reproduction. This study employed molecular markers to study a large colony (n = 56) of African Penguin hosted in an Italian biopark. A panel of 15 STRs (single tandem repeats) was selected, and genotype data were analyzed using COLONY software to determine parentage relationships and compare the existing studbook information to a pedigree built from genetic analyses. The existence of extra-pair mating and the presence of hybrids were investigated: discrepancies in kinship relationships emerged following molecular parentage analysis and 10 unknown genetic relationships were revealed. Infidelity of one member of the pair was observed in 6 cases and extra-pair copulation was assessed by genetic analysis in 2 episodes. One member of the colony was found to be a hybrid (S. demersus × S. humboldti); his progeny, derived by extra-pair copulation, was traced. Three other hidden hybrids were discovered and assessed using the identified candidate private alleles. Overall, our results demonstrate that molecular methods to confirm parentage and analyze relatedness among colony members are a valuable tool to complement studbook-based genetic management of African penguin captive populations. Because a variety of behavioral dynamics (e.g., extra-pair mating) can make observations ineffective in some species and because molecular markers outperform studbook in identifying the presence of hybrids, reliance on studbook information alone is not recommended.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study used 15 microsatellite STRs, molecular sexing, and mtDNA sequencing to reconstruct parentage and detect hybrids in a captive colony of 56 African penguins at an Italian biopark. Genetic data largely confirmed but also corrected the studbook, revealing extra-pair mating, unknown kinships, and hidden Humboldt penguin hybrids.
Key findings
- Molecular sexing succeeded for all 56 penguins, assigning sex to 30 previously unknown individuals, confirming 25 keeper assignments, and correcting one bird (Zin, recorded as male, found female); final colony was 30 males and 26 females.
- COLONY analysis confirmed 74 of 83 studbook kinships; 2 full-sib pairs and 7 family relationships were not confirmed, 2 fathers and 1 mother were assigned differently, and 10 previously unknown family relationships were detected.
- Extra-pair mating was detected: the abstract reports infidelity in 6 cases and extra-pair copulation genetically assessed in 2 episodes; the Discussion reports 4 infidelity episodes from field observation with 3 confirmed by parentage, plus 2 additional episodes found only genetically, and extra-pair mating behavior in 5 of 35 broodstocks (14% prevalence).
- Hybrids were identified: Umbo’s cytb sequence matched Humboldt penguin at 99%, and his genotype carried 8 low-frequency alleles across 7 markers; three other penguins (Malaka, Sorriso, Zin) also had Humboldt mtDNA and more than one of these alleles, while 8 penguins with one or none of Umbo’s alleles matched S. demersus at 99%.
Methods
- The colony comprised 56 African penguins from Wilhelma Zoo, Bird Park Avifauna, and Artis Royal Zoo, grouped at South Lake Wild Animal Park and then transferred to Zoom biopark in Cumiana, Italy.
- DNA from whole blood was used for molecular sexing via a modified Griffiths et al. CHD protocol, microsatellite genotyping with 15 selected polymorphic STRs in 3 multiplex reactions, and mtDNA sequencing of a 421 bp cytochrome b fragment for 15 of 56 penguins.
- Parentage and relatedness were inferred with COLONY v. 2.0.5.9 using full-pedigree maximum likelihood, assuming polygamy without inbreeding; FSTAT and CERVUS were used for diversity and marker statistics, and studbook data were used to exclude impossible parentage based on dates and location.
Limitations
- The paper states that strict adherence to genetic data is not recommended because of scoring or sequencing errors, incomplete sampling of potential parents that were relocated or died, and reduced marker informativeness when low founder number causes high offspring homozygosity.
- The paper notes that some parentage assignments were not consistent among runs and were considered unconfirmed, and that further analyses would be useful to assess the genetic divergence of suspected hybrids from African and Humboldt penguins.
- Evident from the text: the study is limited to one captive colony of 56 birds, mtDNA species identification was performed for only 15 of 56 penguins, and the reported discrepancies and suspected untraced animal exchanges indicate reliance on incomplete historical records.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
9 of 25 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Pedigree analysis by molecular tools can help decision makers detect missing and incorrect information, overall improving breeding programs.
“In such cases, pedigree analysis by molecular tools can help decision makers to detect missing and incorrect information, overall improving breeding programs (Ivy and Lacy 2010;Ferrie et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Molecular methods have the valuable ability to indisputably exclude relationships when mismatched genetic markers are found between offspring and presumed parents recorded in a studbook.
“Molecular methods have the valuable ability to indisputably exclude relationships when mismatched genetic markers are found between offspring and presumed parents recorded in a studbook (Ferrie et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferrie et al. 2013 source
The abstract (page not given in our copy) reports that genetic analysis identified a marabou stork whose sire differed from the studbook record. This supports using molecular markers to challenge recorded parentage, but the available passage does not establish that marker mismatches indisputably exclude a relationship. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The colony was composed of 30 males and 26 females.
“In total, the colony was composed of 30 males and 26 females.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One mother (Amadi) was assigned differently from the studbook.
“One mother (Amadi) was assigned differently from the studbook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Three other hidden hybrids were discovered and assessed using the identified candidate private alleles.
“Three other hidden hybrids were discovered and assessed using the identified candidate private alleles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Extra-pair copulation was assessed by genetic analysis in 2 episodes.
“extra-pair copulation was assessed by genetic analysis in 2 episodes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The hybrid's progeny, derived by extra-pair copulation, was traced.
“his progeny, derived by extra-pair copulation, was traced”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Molecular sexing was successful for all 56 animals tested.
“Molecular sexing was successful for all 56 animals tested.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One member of the colony was found to be a hybrid (S. demersus × S. humboldti).
“One member of the colony was found to be a hybrid (S.demersus × S. humboldti)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Discrepancies in kinship relationships emerged following molecular parentage analysis.
“discrepancies in kinship relationships emerged following molecular parentage analysis”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“several discrepancies in kinship relationships emerged from the comparison of the 2 pedigrees”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Among the unconfirmed relationships, 2 fathers and 1 mother were assigned differently from the studbook reports.
“Among these, 2 fathers and 1 mother were assigned differently from the studbook reports.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no evidence of linkage disequilibrium between loci.
“There was no evidence of linkage disequilibrium between loci.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
FL analysis revealed that 2 couples of penguins (Alfa and Spirit; Irene and Rashida) were neither full-sib nor half-sib.
“FL analysis revealed that 2 couples of penguins (Alfa and Spirit; Irene and Rashida; hereafter, the penguin names will be used as sample IDs) were neither full-sib nor half-sib.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“For instance, 2 penguin couples (Alfa and Spirit, Rashida and Irene) were reported to be full-sib in the documentation accompanying the animals coming from ARZ. FL analysis of the genetic data showed no evidence of either full-sib or half-sib kinship, however.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
COLONY analyses confirmed 74 kinships out of a total of 83 relationships identified through field observations or documentation.
“Analyses carried out using COLONY allowed us to confirm 74 kinships out of a total of 83 relationships identified through field observations or documentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
FL analysis indicated the presence of 5 additional full-sibs not reported in the studbook.
“Lastly, FL analysis indicated the presence of 5 additional full-sibs not reported in the studbook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
10 unknown genetic relationships were revealed by molecular parentage analysis.
“10 unknown genetic relationships were revealed”
- Also stated in: § Microsatellite Data · plain
“Interestingly, 10 unknown family relationships (not reported in the studbook) were detected by genetic data analysis.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Furthermore, the GP showed 10 previously unknown family kinships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Microsatellite Data · plain
- Findingown data
Best configuration analysis and comparison of the genotypes supported maternity for all of these relationships.
“Best configuration analysis and comparison of the genotypes supported maternity for all of these relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Analysis of the dataset showed the presence of one additional unknown maternity parentage (Rashida and Sky) supported by high probability.
“Finally, analysis of the dataset showed the presence of one additional unknown maternity parentage (Rashida and Sky) supported by high probability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Infidelity of one member of the pair was observed in 6 cases.
“Infidelity of one member of the pair was observed in 6 cases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The analysis allowed sex assignment to 30 sex-unknown individuals, including newborns and prepubertal animals.
“The analysis allowed sex assignment to 30 sex-unknown individuals, including newborns and prepubertal animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two pairs of full-sib relationships reported by birth certificates and 7 family relationships derived from field observations were not confirmed.
“Two pairs of full-sib relationships reported by birth certificates and 7 family relationships derived from field observations were not confirmed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Extra-pair mating behavior was detected in 5 individuals within a group of 35 broodstocks (14% prevalence).
“We detected the occurrence of extra-pair mating behavior in 5 individuals within a group of 35 broodstocks (14% prevalence).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The studbook was largely confirmed by the GP.
“The studbook was largely confirmed by the GP”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The analysis revealed an unknown paternity: Sky is the son of Renato (and Rashida).
“Finally, the analysis revealed an unknown paternity: Sky is the son of Renato (and Rashida).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two additional episodes of infidelity were revealed only by genetic analyses.
“Two additional episodes of infidelity were revealed only by our genetic analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No full-sib or half-sib parentage was found between Zin and Biancaneve.
“Both came from WZ, but we found no full-sib or half-sib parentage between them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The couple Zin and Biancaneve, which took care of the young Chris, actually consisted of 2 females.
“Also, we discovered that the couple Zin and Biancaneve, which took care of the young Chris, actually consisted of 2 females.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Umbo's genotyping profile showed 8 alleles (in 7 markers) with a low frequency within the sampled population.
“Moreover, we noted that Umbo's genotyping profile showed 8 alleles (in 7 markers) with a low frequency within the sampled population (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Their mtDNA sequences (Malaka, Sorriso, and Zin) showed that they also belong to Humboldt penguin species.
“Their mtDNA sequences (Malaka, Sorriso, and Zin) showed that they also belong to Humboldt penguin species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Similarities with S. demersus and S. magellanicus sequences were lower (98% and 97%, respectively).
“Similarities with S. demersus and S. magellanicus sequences were lower (98% and 97%, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The family tree based on observation of pairs has been improved and modified thanks to genetic data analysis for this colony.
“The family tree based on observation of pairs has been improved and modified thanks to genetic data analysis for this colony.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Three other subjects carrying more than one of these alleles were detected.
“Three other subjects carrying more than one of these alleles were detected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mtDNA sequences of 8 penguins having one or none of Umbo's alleles showed a similarity of 99% with S. demersus sequences deposited in GenBank.
“The mtDNA sequences of 8 penguins having one or none of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In our study, potential parents may not have been sampled and analyzed because they were relocated or died.
“In our study, as frequently occurs in captive colonies, potential parents may not have been sampled and analyzed, because they were relocated or died.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The young Chris is the son of Biancaneve and Umbo according to genetic analysis.
“According to genetic analysis, the young Chris turned out to be the son of Biancaneve and Umbo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Descriptive parameters of genetic diversity demonstrated that the penguin colony is substantially in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
“Descriptive parameters of genetic diversity demonstrated that the penguin colony is substantially in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some hybrids were identified in the colony that were believed to be pure African penguins.
“Moreover, we also identified some hybrids in the colony that were believed to be pure African penguins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Extra-pair mating can occur in penguins.
“However, extra-pair mating can also occur, as pointed out by the Penguin (Spheniscidae) Care Manual (Schneider et al. 2014) published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schneider et al. 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Some confounders (unknown founders, extra-pair mating, or undisclosed hybrids) may prevent maximizing genetic diversity and minimizing inbreeding.
“However, some confounders (i.e., unknown founders, extra-pair mating, or undisclosed hybrids) may prevent to maximize genetic diversity and minimize inbreeding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Molecular methods to confirm parentage and analyze relatedness among colony members are a valuable tool to complement studbook-based genetic management of African penguin captive populations.
“Overall, our results demonstrate that molecular methods to confirm parentage and analyze relatedness among colony members are a valuable tool to complement studbook-based genetic management of African penguin captive populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Molecular markers outperform studbook in identifying the presence of hybrids.
“because molecular markers outperform studbook in identifying the presence of hybrids”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Sex assignment in juveniles is problematic because comparison can be made only when the animals pair.
“Since comparison can be made only when the animals pair, sex assignment in juveniles is problematic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Penguins are not sexually dimorphic.
- Interpretationown data
Failed paternity assignments were mainly due to the presence of mismatches or null alleles.
“Analysis of individual genotypes revealed that failed paternity assignments were mainly due to the presence of mismatches or null alleles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
S. demersus × S. humboldti hybrids represent a case of anthropogenic hybridization involving species geographically isolated without reproductive isolation.
“On the other hand, S. demersus × S. humboldti hybrids represent a case of anthropogenic hybridization involving species geographically isolated without reproductive isolation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Humboldt and African penguins do not share their habitat in the wild, so heterospecific pairing does not occur in the wild.
- Interpretationreasoning
Molecular markers outperform studbook documentation for recognizing hybrids within collections, especially when private/diagnostic alleles are used to identify the crossed species.
“For this purpose, molecular markers outperform studbook documentation, especially when private/diagnostic alleles are used to identify the crossed species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- May combine two claims. 33
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationThere is a need to develop methods and practical computing tools to analyze pedigrees in order to maintain genetic diversity of ex situ population, main goal of an ex situ breeding program.
“Especially in group-living species, in which pedigree analysis for the genetic management is far from being trivial, there is a need to develop methods and practical computing tools to analyze pedigrees in order to maintain genetic diversity of the ex situ population, main goal of an ex situ breeding program (Jiménez-Mena et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiménez-Mena et al. 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKnowledge of the frequency of extra-pair paternity in colonially nesting species may have implications for the genetic management of captive avian populations.
“Knowledge of the frequency of extra-pair paternity in colonially nesting species may have implications for the genetic management of captive avian populations (Ferrie et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferrie et al. 2013 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious studies proved that the FL method is the most accurate and that COLONY outperforms other commonly used software in carrying out parentage analysis.
“Actually, previous studies proved that the FL method is the most accurate (Wang 2004(Wang , 2012;;Wang and Santure 2009) and that COLONY outperforms other commonly used software in carrying out parentage analysis (Wang 2012;Ferrie et al. 2013;Harrison et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Wang 2004 source
- cites Wang 2012 source
The Marker information section reports that FL outperformed LS and PL in the parentage comparisons, supporting the claim about FL's accuracy within those tests. The Evaluation of the Method section says FL was implemented in COLONY2, but the paper does not establish that COLONY outperforms other commonly used software for parentage analysis; it compares methods rather than software packages. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ferrie et al. 2013 source
The indexed study summary (page not provided) says COLONY helped reconstruct parentage and improve the marabou stork studbook. It does not compare COLONY with other parentage-analysis software; searches for software comparisons and relative accuracy found no such passage. The separate FL-method claim is attributed to other citations, not Ferrie et al. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn captivity, hybrids between Humboldt and Magellanic penguins, Humboldt and African penguins, and African and Magellanic penguins are reported.
“In captivity, hybrids between Humboldt and Magellanic penguins, Humboldt and African penguins, and African and Magellanic penguins are reported (Thumser and Karron 1994;McCarthy 2006;Simeone et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Thumser and Karron 1994 source
- cites McCarthy 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Simeone et al. 2009 source
The introduction reports captive interbreeding between Humboldt and Magellanic penguins, including fertile offspring. The Results report two captive Humboldt–African hybrids. Our copy does not report captive African–Magellanic hybrids, so it supports only two of the three pairings attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe genus Spheniscus comprises two more extant species besides Humboldt and African penguins: the Magellanic penguin and the Galapagos penguin.
“The genus Spheniscus comprises 2 more extant species, other than Humboldt and African penguins: the Magellanic penguin (S. magellanicus) and the Galapagos penguin (S. mendiculus) (Ksepka and Thomas, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ksepka and Thomas, 2012 source
The Results (page unavailable) state that Spheniscus has four extant species and identify S. magellanicus as the sister species of the African penguin, S. demersus. Our copy does not identify the other two extant species as the Humboldt and Galapagos penguins, so it does not fully support the cited species list. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBased on molecular and morphological data, Galapagos and Humboldt penguins are considered sister species, as are Magellanic and African penguins.
“Based on molecular and morphological dataset, Galapagos and Humboldt penguins are considered sister species, as are Magellanic and African penguins (Ksepka and Thomas 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ksepka and Thomas 2012 source
The Methods describe an analysis combining morphological and molecular data, and the Results explicitly call African penguins (S. demersus) and Magellanic penguins (S. magellanicus) sister species. The passages in our copy do not establish the claimed sister relationship between Galápagos and Humboldt penguins. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOut of 29 maternity kinships reported in the studbook, 17 were confirmed by the software with a probability >95%, 5 with relaxed confidence, and 7 with low confidence.
“Out of 29 maternity kinships reported in the studbook, 17 were confirmed by the software with a probability >95%, 5 with relaxed confidence, and 7 with low confidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOnly 1 marker (PNN07) showed absence of amplification in 2 samples (Ice and Picchio).
“Only 1 marker (PNN07) showed the absence of amplification in 2 samples (Ice and Picchio).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sexing protocol produced a 364-bp fragment of the CHD gene in male samples and two fragments (364 bp and 380 bp) in female samples.
“Following our protocol, PCR reaction on male samples produced a 364-bp fragment of the CHD gene and showed a single peak after capillary electrophoresis; female samples were characterized by 2 CHD gene fragments of different length (364 bp and 380 bp) with 2 peaks in the electropherogram.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither Fis values calculated for each marker nor that of the whole population showed a statistically significant P value (P < 0.05).
“Neither Fis values calculated for each marker nor that of the whole population showed a statistically significant P value (P < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSex assigned by keepers was confirmed in 25 other animals, and was wrong in one case: Zin, considered a male, was found to be female.
“Sex assigned by keepers was confirmed in 25 other animals, which proved wrong in one case: the penguin named Zin, considered a male, was found to be female.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOnly 5 markers showed a PIC less than 0.5.
“Only 5 markers showed a PIC less than 0.5 (B3-2; PNN05; PNN07; Sh2Ca22; Em6.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 26 microsatellites tested for kinship, 7 showed no positive amplification and 4 were monomorphic and excluded from further analyses.
“Of the 26 microsatellites tested for kinship, 7 (PNN03, Sh2Ca21, G2-2, G3-6, M1-11, and EMM1 EMM3) showed no positive amplification in our samples, whereas 4 (H2-6, Em2, EMM2 and EMM5) were monomorphic and excluded from further analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFrequency of the null allele ranged from -0.075 to 0.085 and was considered irrelevant.
“Frequency of the null allele ranged from -0.075 to 0.085 and was considered irrelevant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOut of 26 full-sib pairs, 14 were confirmed with strict confidence, 2 with relaxed confidence, 8 with low confidence, and 2 full-sibs pairs were not confirmed.
“Out of 26 full-sib pairs, 14 were confirmed with strict confidence, 2 with relaxed confidence, 8 with low confidence, and 2 full-sibs pairs were not confirmed (Tables 2 and 3, and Supplementary Figure 1S).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenetic data indicate that Amadi is more likely Isa's mother (96% probability) rather than his sister (68% probability), and best configuration analysis confirmed this likelihood.
“Genetic data highlighted that Amadi is more likely Isa's mother (96% probability) rather than his sister (68% probability) and best configuration analysis confirmed this likelihood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese alleles allowed Umbo's assignment to his progeny (2 sons and 1 grandson), even if their mtDNA was found to have a similarity of 99% with sequences of S. demersus.
“These alleles allowed Umbo's assignment to his progeny (2 sons and 1 grandson), even if their mtDNA was found to have a similarity of 99% with sequences of S. demersus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe cytb sequence obtained from Umbo's DNA showed a similarity of 99% with Humboldt penguin sequences deposited in GenBank, showing that Umbo belongs, at least for the maternal line, to the S. humboldti species.
“The cytb sequence obtained from Umbo's DNA showed a similarity of 99% with Humboldt penguin sequences deposited in GenBank, showing that Umbo belongs, at least for the maternal line, to the S. humboldti species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenetic analysis revealed extra-pair copulations, same-sex couples, and hybrids S. spheniscus × S. humboldti in the colony.
“Genetic analysis allowed us to highlight aspects of species biology that are hard to assess by observations: extra-pair copulations, same sex couples, and hybrids S. spheniscus × S. humboldti.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOut of the 28 paternity relationships reported in the studbook, 12 were confirmed with a probability >95%, 4 with relaxed confidence, and 5 with low confidence.
“Out of the 28 paternity relationships reported in the studbook, 12 were confirmed with a probability >95%, 4 with relaxed confidence, and 5 with low confidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the group studied, some individuals showed African penguin phenotypic aspects but had both S. humboldti mitochondrial DNA and nuclear markers that could be private alleles of S. humboldti.
“In the group studied here, some individuals showed African penguin phenotypical aspects but had both S. humboldti mitochondrial DNA and nuclear markers that could be private alleles of S. humboldti.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the 16-month observation period, 4 episodes of infidelity were recorded by field observations, and parentage genetic analysis confirmed extra-pair copulation in 3 cases.
“During the 16-month observation period, 4 episodes of infidelity were recorded by field observations and parentage genetic analysis of the offspring confirmed extra-pair copulation in 3 cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing only molecular data (sex and genotype) and age information, 89% of the parentage relationships were reconstructed and 11% of the studbook data were not confirmed.
“Using only molecular data (sex and genotype) and age information, 89% of the parentage relationships were reconstructed and 11% of the studbook data were not confirmed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMolecular methods can be effectively employed to identify unknown parentage relationships, assess presence of hybrids, assign sex, and verify accuracy of existing pedigrees.
“Molecular methods could help to reduce uncertainty since they can be effectively employed to: 1) identify unknown parentage relationships; 2) assess the presence of hybrids; 3) assign sex to the components of the colony; and 4) verify the accuracy of the existing pedigrees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenStudbook data were systematically used to exclude paternity and maternity on the basis of date of birth, date of death, and date of relocation.
“Studbook data were systematically used to exclude paternity and maternity on the basis of date of birth, date of death, and date of relocation (i.e., offspring had to have been born after parents but before the death of the putative parent and at the same institution).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOur findings provide new baseline knowledge about ethology and mating behavior of African penguins that have important implications for correct management and breeding of these seabirds in captivity, and provide a valuable contribution to studies in other captive populations.
“Our findings provide new baseline knowledge about ethology and mating behavior of African penguins that have important implications for the correct management and breeding of these seabirds in captivity, and provide a valuable contribution to studies in other captive populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenHomozygous samples were amplified 3 times to limit the large allele drop-out effect.
“Homozygous samples were amplified 3 times to limit the large allele drop-out effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAccurate pedigrees yield essential information on inbreeding, kinships among individuals, and the distribution of individual founder contributions to a population.
“Accurate pedigrees yield essential information on inbreeding, kinships among individuals, and the distribution of individual founder contributions to a population (Ivy and Lacy 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ivy and Lacy 2010 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral penguin species have sometimes been hosted in the same enclosures, and this practice may have led to mating between 2 species and to the spread of hybrid subjects.
“The Manual calls attention to the fact that several penguin species have sometimes been hosted in the same enclosures.This unwise practice may have led to the mating (also extra-pair mating) between 2 species and to the spread of hybrid subjects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schneider et al. 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataWhen reconstructed consistently among runs, sibship and parentage were considered reliably inferred and taken into account to confirm colony pedigree.
“When reconstructed consistently among runs, sibship and parentage were considered reliably inferred and taken into account to confirm colony pedigree.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur approach allowed us to highlight aspects of species biology (extra-pair fertilizations, polygamy, cuckoldry) important for natural populations and to disclose potential problem of hybrids particularly important if ex situ population is considered a source of integration or restoration of populations in situ.
“Moreover, our approach allowed us to highlight aspects of species biology (i.e., extra-pair fertilizations, polygamy, cuckoldry) important for natural populations and to disclose the potential problem of hybrids particularly important if the ex situ population is considered a source of integration or restoration of populations in situ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA reaction without any DNA was added as negative control to each run to assess absence of contamination.
“A reaction without any DNA was added as negative control to each run to assess absence of contamination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationMultiple runs with 3 different random number seeds were performed to check/confirm software output reliability, as suggested by Wang (2004).
“Since the dataset was small and included families assumed to be very small (1 to 3 offspring per sibship), multiple runs with 3 different random number seeds were performed to check/confirm software output reliability, as suggested by Wang (2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang (2004) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBetween 80% and 90% of penguins in the wild retain the same mate at each mating season.
“Indeed, between 80% and 90% of penguins in the wild retain the same mate at each mating season (Randall 1983).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Randall 1983
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn this case, one female of the couple paired with a male and then hatched the egg with another female.
“In this case, one female of the couple paired with a male and then hatched the egg with another female.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese individuals could be a first generation of hybrids or a backcross from an F1 with African penguin.
“Accordingly, they could be a first generation of hybrids or a backcross from a F1 with African penguin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe kinship analysis performed in this study is the first to be carried out in a colony of African penguins housed in a European zoo.
“The kinship analysis we performed is the first to be carried out in a colony of African penguins housed in a European zoo (Valentina Isaja, member of the EEP African Penguin Committee; personal communication).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStrict adherence to genetic data is not recommendable because besides scoring or sequencing errors, other limitations in the use of genetic data for parentage assignment can emerge when sampling of potential parents is incomplete or homozygosity reduces the informativeness of the markers.
“Nonetheless, strict adherence to genetic data is not recommendable: besides scoring or sequencing errors, other limitations in the use of genetic data for parentage assignment can emerge when sampling of potential parents is incomplete or homozygosity reduces the informativeness of the markers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe penguins display no phenotypical characters of S. humboldti species and are probably hybrids.
“The penguins display no phenotypical characters of S. humboldti species and are probably hybrids.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationOur analysis of a colony of African penguins addresses the need to combine molecular data with observational and studbook information in the management of captive animal populations.
“In conclusion, our analysis of a colony of African penguins addresses the need to combine molecular data with observational and studbook information in the management of captive animal populations (Fienieg and Galbusera 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fienieg and Galbusera 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHumboldt x African hybrids are considered quite common and recognized as partially fertile, since some individuals are known to have had offspring.
“In particular, Humboldt x African hybrids are considered quite common and recognized as partially fertile, since some individuals are known to have had offspring (McCarthy 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McCarthy 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll unknown relationships, although assigned with a probability between 80% and 90%, were confirmed by comparing the offspring's and parents' genotypes and by the best configuration obtained using maximum likelihood analysis.
“All unknown relationships, although assigned with a probability between 80% and 90%, were confirmed by comparing the offspring's and parents' genotypes and by the best configuration obtained using maximum likelihood analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIn such circumstances, molecular methods could provide a useful tool for testing studbook records.
“In such circumstances, molecular methods could provide a useful tool for testing studbook records.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenOf the studies on extra-pair copulation in penguins, only the study by Sakaoka and colleagues was conducted on captive animals.
“Of these studies, only that by Sakaoka and colleagues was conducted on captive animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sakaoka et al. 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationUnravelling the mating system of a species is essential for successful breeding, captive management, and conservation programs.
“Unravelling the mating system of a species is essential for successful breeding, captive management, and conservation programs (Miño et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Miño et al. 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLow founder number is associated with high homozygosity in offspring, which might explain the absence or low probability of paternity assignment to the candidate father.
“founders is low, a high homozygosity in offspring could be observed and might explain the absence (or a low probability) of paternity assignment to the candidate father.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWe hypothesized a documental error or an incorrect assignment to the same mating pair in the zoo of origin.
“We hypothesized a documental error or an incorrect assignment to the same mating pair in the zoo of origin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExtra-pair copulation has been described in Humboldt penguins and Adélie penguins.
“Although long believed a monogamous species, extra-pair copulation has been described in different penguin species: the Humboldt penguin (Spheniscus humboldti; Schwartz et al. 1999) and the Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae; Hunter et al. 1995;Hunter and Davis 1998;Pilastro et al. 2001;Sakaoka et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen the number of founders is low, a high homozygosity in offspring could be observed and might explain the absence (or a low probability) of paternity assignment.
“Moreover, when the number of founders is low, a high homozygosity in offspring could be observed and might explain the absence (or a low probability) of paternity assignment to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Penguins are not sexually dimorphic.
“Penguins are not sexually dimorphic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A variety of behavioral dynamics (e.g., extra-pair mating) can make observations ineffective in some species.
“Because a variety of behavioral dynamics (e.g., extra-pair mating) can make observations ineffective in some species”
The paper relies on this without support.
Humboldt and African penguins do not share their habitat in the wild, so heterospecific pairing does not occur in the wild.
“Humboldt and African penguins do not share their habitat hence in the wild heterospecific pairing does not occur.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In zoos, environmental conditions are typically benign, increasing the probability of survival for hybrids that might not otherwise survive in the wild.
“In zoos, environmental conditions are typically benign increasing the probability of survival for hybrids that might not otherwise survive in the wild.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Two loci have different names in Table 1
MinorThe genotyping panel names these loci Sh1Ca16 and Sh1Ca17, but Table 1 reports them as Sh2Ca16 and Sh2Ca17.
“multiplex 1 (PNN01, PNN09, PNN12, B3-2, Sh1Ca16, and Sh1Ca17)”
“| Sh2Ca16 | 4.000 | 0.629 | 0.607 | 0.035 | 0.405 | 0.565 | 0.790 | 0.633 | 0.461 | 0.200 | 0.488 | 0.020 |”
Hybrid parent species is named inconsistently
MinorThe discussion identifies the hybrid cross as S. spheniscus × S. humboldti, while the abstract identifies it as S. demersus × S. humboldti.
“hybrids S. spheniscus × S. humboldti”
“One member of the colony was found to be a hybrid (S.demersus × S. humboldti)”
Table 4 names a locus absent from the selected panel
MinorThe selected 15-locus panel contains Sh2Ca22, whereas Table 4 calls the candidate-private-allele locus Sh1Ca22.
“| Sh1Ca22 | 91 | 0.036 |”
“Parentage and population parameters were obtained by evaluating the genotyping data from a panel of 15 microsatellites (B3-2; PNN01; PNN05; PNN06; PNN07; PNN08; PNN09; PNN12; Sh1Ca16; Sh2Ca22; Sh1Ca17; Em1; Em6.2; Em8; Em12.2).”
Cites
FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics
Goudet, J. (1995) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627 · Cited by 7,639 · see citing works
Kalinowski, S. T., Taper, M. L., & MARSHALL, T. C. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03089.x · Cited by 5,240 · see citing works
Griffiths, R., Double, M. C., Orr, K. J., & Dawson, R. J. G. (1998) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x · Cited by 3,099 · see citing works
The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines
Allendorf, F. W., Leary, R. F., Spruell, P., & Wenburg, J. K. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02290-x · Cited by 1,892 · see citing works
Sibship Reconstruction From Genetic Data With Typing Errors
Wang, J. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/166.4.1963 · Cited by 946 · see citing works
Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors
Wang, J. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.166.4.1963 · Cited by 946
Parentage and Sibship Inference From Multilocus Genotype Data Under Polygamy
Wang, J., & Santure, A. W. (2009) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.100214 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management, Second Edition
Kleiman, D. G., Thompson, K. V., & Baer, C. K. (2010) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226440118.001.0001 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Detecting hybridization between wild species and their domesticated relatives
Randi, E. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03417.x · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Adaptive introgression as a resource for management and genetic conservation in a changing climate
Hamilton, J. A., & Miller, J. M. (2015) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12574 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Boersma, P. D. (2008) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b580707 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Verma, S. K., & Singh, L. (2002) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00340.x · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Penguins: natural history and conservation
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-0892 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Allendorf, F. W., Leary, R. F., Hitt, N. P., et al. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00305.x · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Collapse of South Africa's penguins in the early 21st century
Crawford, R., Altwegg, R., Barham, B., Barham, P., Durant, J., Dyer, B., Geldenhuys, D., Makhado, A., Pichegru, L., Ryan, P., et al. (2011) · African Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.2989/1814232x.2011.572377 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations
Harrison, H. B., Saenz‐Agudelo, P., Planes, S., et al. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12138 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Jackiw, R., Mandil, G., & Hager, H. A. (2015) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12526 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Genomic evidence of speciation reversal in ravens
Kearns, A. M., Restani, M., Szabó, I., Schrøder‐Nielsen, A., Kim, J. A., Richardson, H. M., Marzluff, J. M., Fleischer, R. C., Johnsen, A., & Omland, K. E. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03294-w · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Penguins : natural history and conservation
Borboroglu, P. G., & Boersma, P. D. (2013) · University of Washington Press eBooks · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data
Wang, J. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.138149 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Conservation of the jackass penguin (Spheniscus demersus (L.))
Frost, P. G. H., Siegfried, W. R., & Cooper, J. (1976) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(76)90042-2 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
What can livestock breeders learn from conservation genetics and vice versa?
Kristensen, T. N., Hoffmann, A. A., Pertoldi, C., & Strønen, A. V. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00038 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Crawford, R. J. M., Barham, P. J., Underhill, L. G., Shannon, L. J., Coetzee, J. C., Dyer, B. M., Leshoro, T. M., & Upfold, L. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.019 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Distribution, population size and conservation of the jackass penguin<i>Spheniscus demersus</i>
Shelton, P. A., Crawford, R. J. M., Cooper, J., & Brooke, R. K. (1984) · South African Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.2989/02577618409504370 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Got Hybridization? A Multidisciplinary Approach for Informing Science Policy
Ellstrand, N. C., Biggs, D., Kaus, A., et al. (2010) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.5.8 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Favaro, L., Gamba, M., Alfieri, C., Pessani, D., & McElligott, A. G. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep17255 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationUNDERHILL, L. G., BARTLETT, P. A., BAUMANN, L., CRAWFORD, R. J. M., DYER, B. M., GILDENHUYS, A., NEL, D. C., OATLEY, T. B., THORNTON, M., UPFOLD, L., et al. (1999) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1999.tb04260.x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations
Koch, M., Hadfield, J. D., Sefc, K. M., et al. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03925.x · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Vocal Repertoire of the African Penguin (Spheniscus demersus): Structure and Function of Calls
Favaro, L., Ozella, L., & Pessani, D. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103460 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationProceedings of the Symposium on Birds of the Sea and Shore, 1979
Bourne, W. R. P. (1984) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0025-326x(84)90450-8 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
A comparison of genetic diversity between the Galápagos Penguin and the Magellanic Penguin
Akst, E. P., Boersma, P. D., & Fleischer, R. C. (2002) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1023/a:1020555303124 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Female‐solicited extrapair matings in Humboldt penguins fail to produce extrapair fertilizations
Schwartz, M. K. (1999) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/10.3.242 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Top predators in the Benguela ecosystem — implications of their trophic position
Crawford, R. J. M., Underhill, L. G., Raubenheimer, C. M., et al. (1992) · South African Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.2989/02577619209504732 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Ivy, J. A., & Lacy, R. C. (2010) · Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511777592.012 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Multiple cenozoic invasions of Africa by penguins (Aves, Sphenisciformes)
Ksepka, D. T., & Thomas, D. B. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1592 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Hunter, F. M., & Davis, L. S. (1998) · The Auk · doi:10.2307/4089218 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Amador, C., Hayes, B. J., & Daetwyler, H. D. (2013) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12113 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Patterns and impacts of oiling of African penguins Spheniscus demersus: 1981–1991
Adams, N. J. (1994) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)90544-4 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
López‐Pujol, J., Garcia‐Jacas, N., Susanna, A., et al. (2012) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.032 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Aykanat, T., Johnston, S. E., Cotter, D., et al. (2014) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-68 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Mate switching and copulation behaviour in the Adélie penguin
Hunter, F. M., Miller, G. D., & Davis, L. S. (1995) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853995x00090 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ferrie, G. M., Cohen, O. R., Schutz, P., Leighty, K. A., Plasse, C., Bettinger, T. L., & Hoffman, E. A. (2013) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21090 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Pedigree analysis for the genetic management of group-living species
Jiménez‐Mena, B., Schad, K., Hanna, N., & Lacy, R. C. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1831 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
ISIS database: An evaluation of records essential for captive management
Earnhardt, J. M., Thompson, S. D., & Willis, K. B. (1995) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.1430140602 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Simeone, A., Hiriart-Bertrand, L., Reyes-Arriagada, R., Halpern, M., Dubach, J., Wallace, R., Pütz, K., & Lüthi, B. (2009) · The Condor · doi:10.1525/cond.2009.090083 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Extrapair paternity in the Adélie Penguin Pygoscelis adeliae
Pilastro, A., Pezzo, F., Olmastroni, S., et al. (2001) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2001.tb04898.x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The use and integration of molecular DNA information in conservation breeding programmes: a review
(2013) · The Journal of zoo and aquarium research · doi:10.19227/jzar.v1i2.31 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Miño, C. I., Sawyer, G. M., Benjamin, R. C., et al. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A Ecological Genetics and Physiology · doi:10.1002/jez.543 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Edwards, T., Cox, E. C., Buzzard, V., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102787 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
BILLING, T. M., Guay, P., Peucker, A. J., et al. (2006) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01607.x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Patterns of genetic polymorphism in five species of penguins
Karron, J. D. (1994) · The Auk · doi:10.2307/4088838 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Parentage test in broad-snouted caimans (Caiman latirostris, Crocodylidae) using microsatellite DNA
Zucoloto, R. B., Verdade, L. M., Villela, P. M. S., et al. (2009) · Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1590/s1415-47572009005000077 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Conservation genetics in the age of genomics
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-3135 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Sakaoka, K., Suzuki, I., Kasugai, N., & Fukumoto, Y. (2014) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21165 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Spheniscus demersus: BirdLife International
IUCN (2013) · IUCN Red List of Threatened Species · doi:10.2305/iucn.uk.2015.rlts.t22697810a84636189.en · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ballou, 2010, Demographic and genetic management of captive populations
- Lacy, 2009, Stopping evolution: genetic management of captive populations, 58
- McCarthy, 2006, Handbook of avia hybrids of the world, 195
- Morant, 1981, The rehabilitation of oiled jackass penguins Spheniscus demersus 1970–1980, 267
- Randall, 1983, Biology of the Jackass Penguin Spheniscus demersus (L.) at St Croix Island, South Africa
- Schneider, 2014, Penguin (Spheniscidae) care manual
- WAZA, 2005, Ethical guidelines for the conduct of research on animals by zoos and aquariums, ZOOS’ PRINT, XX, 12
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barrett, K. G., Amaral, G., Elphinstone, M., et al. (2022) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-022-01429-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Elsner-Gearing, F., Kretzschmar, P., Shultz, S., Pilgrim, M., Dawson, D. A., Horsburgh, G. J., Hruby, J., Hopper, J., King, T., & Walton, C. (2024) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-024-01611-z · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Another factor that can impact the value of ex situ populations for reintroduction is if they have been founded or supplemented using animals of diverse or unknown origins, whether opportun-istically or intentionally (Modesto et al. 2018; Senn et al. 2019).”
Borecki, P., Rosenberger, J., Mucha, A., & Partyka, A. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54105-w · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Pairs 20, 29, 27, 30 with a 1-year bond were the most similar to each other and also to pair 15 with a 2-year bond.”
BackgroundInfluentialBaciadonna, L., Pasquaretta, C., Maraner, V., et al. (2024) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106232 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Promising candidates that might contribute to group formation include genetic relatedness and personality traits (Bos et al., 2016; Figel et al., 2023; Goumon et al., 2020; Hansen et al., 2009; Modesto et al., 2018; Pastorino et al., 2019; Traisnel and Pichegru, 2019).”
Self-citationHow admixed captive breeding populations could be rescued using local ancestry information
Lawson, D. J., Howard‐McCombe, J., Beaumont, M., & Senn, H. (2024) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.17349 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…(Randi, 2008) experience this problem, and it is a potential threat to captive breeding programs including African penguins ( Spheniscus demersus ) (Modesto et al., 2018), crocodiles ( Crocodylus siamensis and C. porosus ) (Lapbenjakul et al., 2017), Bison ( Bison bison ) (Stroupe et al., 2022)…”
McLennan, E. A., Belov, K., Hogg, C. J., & Grueber, C. E. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2462 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lawson, D. J., Howard‐McCombe, J., Beaumont, M., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.27.550812 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Partridges and wolves [32] experience this problem, and it is a threat to captive breeding programs including African penguins [33], crocodiles [34], and in our case, the Scottish wildcat.”
BackgroundGenetic diversity and structure of captive gentoo penguin populations in Japan
Aoki, Y., Zaitsu, Y., Kurita, M., et al. (2021) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21666 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Do ocean currents shape patterns of penguin hybridization?
Ottenburghs, J. (2025) · Polar Biology · doi:10.1007/s00300-025-03405-6
“Finally, captive hybrids between Magellanic Penguin and African Penguin (International Zoo Yearbook 1998), and between Humboldt Penguin and African Penguin (Modesto et al. 2018) are known from several zoos.”
Detection of Extra‐Pair Paternity in Captive Gentoo Penguins Using Genetic Analysis
Shimura, S., Zaitsu, Y., & Tadano, R. (2025) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.70032
Kaizer, M., Bittencourt, P., Polo, É. M., et al. (2025) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.70030
- Authors
- Modesto, P., Biolatti, C., Favaro, L., Colussi, S., Peletto, S., Piga, S., Riina, M. V., Pessani, D., Trincas, E., Isaja, V., & Acutis, P. L.
- Affiliations
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta (IT)
- University of Turin (IT)
- Zoom Torino, Strada Piscina, Cumiana, Turin, Italy
- Corresponding author
- Modesto, Paola
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Heredity
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-07-13
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 653-662
- ISSN
- 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7333
- OpenAlex
- W2841731550
- Semantic Scholar
- 55e3552c37bfb20f25d6a7c68a30063cb1e1443d
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Heredity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Italian Ministry of Health (IZS PLV 02/10 RC)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- African penguin, Spheniscus demersus, Humboldt penguin, hybridization, extra-pair paternity, parentage analysis, inbreeding, STR markers, private alleles, kinship
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA, Mitochondrial, Female, Genetic Markers, Hybridization, Genetic, Male, Sex Determination Analysis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Spheniscidae, Genotyping Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review