Music for the birds: effects of auditory enrichment on captive bird species
Abstract
With the increase of mixed species exhibits in zoos, targeting enrichment for individual species may be problematic. Often, mammals may be the primary targets of enrichment, yet other species that share their environment (such as birds) will unavoidably be exposed to the enrichment as well. The purpose of this study was to determine if (1) auditory stimuli designed for enrichment of primates influenced the behavior of captive birds in the zoo setting, and (2) if the specific type of auditory enrichment impacted bird behavior. Three different African bird species were observed at the Buffalo Zoo during exposure to natural sounds, classical music and rock music. The results revealed that the average frequency of flying in all three bird species increased with naturalistic sounds and decreased with rock music (F = 7.63, df = 3,6, P = 0.018); vocalizations for two of the three species (Superb Starlings and Mousebirds) increased (F = 18.61, df = 2,6, P = 0.0027) in response to all auditory stimuli, however one species (Lady Ross's Turacos) increased frequency of duetting only in response to rock music (X(2) = 18.5, df = 2, P < 0.0001). Auditory enrichment implemented for large mammals may influence behavior in non-target species as well, in this case leading to increased activity by birds.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MSE promotes cognitive enrichment, particularly auditory enrichment as it is easier for keepers to create.
“Robbins & Margulis, (2016) promotes MSE as cognitive enrichment, particularly auditory enrichment as it is easier for keepers to create.”
From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Robbins & Margulis, (2016)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria
Green, H., Palmer, G. A., & Brereton, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities · doi:10.56397/jrssh.2022.12.02 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Robbins & Margulis, (2016) promotes MSE as cognitive enrichment, particularly auditory enrichment as it is easier for keepers to create.”
Background
- Authors
- Robbins, L., & Margulis, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Canisius College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Margulis, Susan W.
- ORCID
- Margulis, Susan W.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-34
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2443971364
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- auditory enrichment, captive birds, zoo animal welfare, non-target organisms, natural sounds, classical music, rock music, bird behavior, vocalizations, duetting, African birds, mousebirds
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Birds, Motor Activity, Music, Species Specificity, Vocalization, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review