Cited by 18Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesConservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Weighing the options for limiting surplus animals

Asa, Cheryl·2016·Zoo Biology

Abstract

The unsustainability of many animal programs managed by zoos and aquariums has brought renewed attention to unresolved questions about various management strategies. Solving the "sustainability crisis" for many species will require housing more adults and producing more offspring than there are existing spaces in accredited zoos and aquariums. Careful reproductive management is central to addressing this challenge, but opinions differ about which management strategies are best for an individual, for a species, for an institution, or for a country or region. The primary options for limiting the number of animals that would be surplus to the population are to prevent reproduction or to euthanize. However, there is much misunderstanding about methods for controlling reproduction, in particular about contraceptives and species differences in their effects. Careful weighing of all the options is called for. Lifetime Reproductive Planning may help increase breeding success through careful reproductive management but cannot eliminate production of surplus animals. Limiting reproduction does not address the problem of animals already in the population. Despite best efforts and planning, consistently hitting target numbers for a population may never be achieved. Increasing capacity provides a temporary patch when targets are exceeded, but is not a long-term solution, since each generation potentially produces even more individuals needing even more space. Welfare considerations should…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.21293

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to population size constraints and logistical, financial, and practical challenges related to translocations, many healthy, fertile animals may never reproduce, even for highly endangered species.

    “Due to the inherent population size constraints associated with housing animals in zoos and the logistical, financial, and practical challenges related to translocations, many healthy, fertile animals may never reproduce, even for highly endangered species [33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asa, C.
Affiliations
Saint Louis Zoo (US)
Corresponding author
Asa, Cheryl
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
183-186
ISSN
0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2402019012
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
zoo animal management, aquarium animals, reproductive management, contraception, euthanasia, breeding objectives, population sustainability, animal welfare, captive breeding
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animals, Zoo, Breeding, Conservation of Natural Resources, Housing, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review