Cited by 23Amphibian and Reptile BiologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Variation in food availability mediate the impact of density on cannibalism, growth, and survival in larval yellow spotted mountain newts (Neurergus microspilotus): Implications for captive breeding programs

Vaissi, Somaye, Sharifi, Mozafar·2016·Zoo Biology

Abstract

In this study, we examined cannibalistic behavior, growth, metamorphosis, and survival in larval and post-metamorph endangered yellow spotted mountain newts Neurergus microspilotus hatched and reared in a captive breeding facility. We designed a 2 × 2 factorial experiment, crossing two levels of food with two levels of density including high food/high density, high food/low density, low food/high density, and low food/low density. The level of cannibalistic behavior (including the loss of fore and hind limbs, missing toes, tail, gills, body damage, and whole body consumption) changed as the larvae grew, from a low level during the first 4 weeks, peaking from weeks 7 to 12, and then dropped during weeks 14-52. Both food level and density had a significant effect on cannibalism. The highest frequency of cannibalism was recorded for larvae reared in the low food/high density and lowest in high food/low density treatments. Growth, percent of larval metamorphosed, and survival were all highest in the high food/low density and lowest in low food/high density treatment. Food level had a significant effect on growth, metamorphosis, and survival. However, the two levels of density did not influence growth and metamorphosis but showed a significant effect on survival. Similarly, combined effects of food level and density showed significant effects on growth, metamorphosis, and survival over time. Information obtained from current experiment could improve productivity of captive breedin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.21327

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amphibians are rarely found in mixed communities in the wild because they have been observed predating singular or similar species (cannibalism).

    “Amphibian cannibalism has been researched suggesting why amphibians are rarely found in mixed communities in the wild as they have been observed predating singular or similar species (Crump 1983;Vaissi & Sharifi, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaissi, S., & Sharifi, M.
Affiliations
Razi University (IR)
Corresponding author
Sharifi, Mozafar
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-05
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
513-521
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W2528834622
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
cannibalism, larval density, food availability, larval growth, larval metamorphosis, larval survival, captive breeding, endangered amphibians, reintroduction, amphibian conservation
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Zoo, Breeding, Cannibalism, Feeding Methods, Larva, Population Density, Salamandridae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review