Cited by 6Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Seasonal mortality in zoo ruminants: Zoo Ruminant Seasonal Mortality

Open access
Carisch, Lea, Müller, Dennis W. H., Hatt, Jean-Michel, Bingaman Lackey, Laurie, Rensch, E. Eberhard, Clauss, Marcus, Zerbe, Philipp·2017·Zoo Biology

Abstract

While seasonality has often been investigated with respect to reproduction, seasonality of mortality has received less attention. We investigated whether a seasonal signal of mortality exists in wild ruminants kept in zoos, using data from 60,591 individuals of 88 species. We quantified the mortality in the 3 consecutive months with the highest above-baseline mortality (3 MM). 3 MM was not related to relative life expectancy of species, indicating that seasonal mortality does not necessarily impact husbandry success. Although 3 MM was mainly observed in autumn/winter months, there was no evidence for an expected negative relationship with the latitude of the species' natural habitat and no positive relationship between 3 MM and the mean temperature in that habitat, indicating no evidence for species from lower latitudes/warmer climates being more susceptible to seasonal mortality under zoo conditions. 3 MM was related to reproductive biology, with seasonally reproducing species also displaying more seasonal mortality. This pattern differed between groups: In cervids, the onset of seasonal mortality appeared linked to the onset of rut in both sexes. This was less evident in bovids, where in a number of species (especially caprids), the onset of female seasonal mortality was linked to the lambing period. While showing that the origin of a species from warmer climate zones does not constrain husbandry success in ruminants in terms of an increased seasonal mortality, the results suggest that husbandry measures aimed at protecting females from rutting males are important, especially in cervids. Zoo Biol. 36:74-86, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.21337

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seasonal aggression within rutting season of deer can lead to interspecific conflicts whereby males of different Artiodactylae will compete regardless of species or size, with a resulting risk of injury.

    “For example, seasonal aggression within rutting season of deer can lead to interspecific conflicts whereby males of different Artiodactylae will compete regardless of species or size, with a resulting risk of injury (Carisch & et al., 2016).”

    From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Carisch & et al., 2016

    The Seasonal Mortality and Reproductive Biology section describes aggression during the rut and warns of potentially lethal combat among male cervids. It does not say that males of different artiodactyl species compete with one another regardless of species or size; its discussion of fighting concerns males within groups, and it says some bovids fight without serious injury. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bronson FH. 1989. Mammalian reproductive biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
  3. Clauss M, Dierenfeld ES. 2008. The nutrition of browsers. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE, editors. Zoo and wild animal medicine Current therapy 6. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier. p444-p454.
  4. Ebi KL, Mills D. 2013. Winter mortality in a warming climate: a reassessment. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4:203-212.
  5. Flach EJ. 2008. Gastrointestinal nematodiasis in hoofstock. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE, editors. Zoo and wild animal medicine: current therapy. Saint Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier. p416-p422.
  6. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160:712-726.
  7. Geist V. 1971. Mountain sheep. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Gull JM, M€ uller DWH, Michel A, Szabo D, Hammer S. 2010. Seasonal changes in mortality of captive artiodactyla populations in a desert zoo. Proceedings of the International Conference on Diseases of Zoo and Wild Animals 2:197-199.
  9. Gagnon M, Chew AE (2000) Dietary preferences in extant African Bovidae. Journal of Mammalogy 81:490-511
  10. Müller DWH, Lackey LB, Streich WJ, Fickel J, Hatt J-M, Clauss M (2011) Mating system, feeding type and ex situ conservation effort determine life expectancy in captive ruminants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 278:2076-2080
  11. Weckerly FW (1998) Sexual-size dimorphism: influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. Journal of Mammalogy:33-52
  12. 2015 Abschlussprüfung vet. med. (Vetsuisse Fakultät, Zürich, Schweiz) 01/2016 -06/2016 Anfertigung der Dissertation «Seasonal Mortality in Zoo Ruminants» unter Leitung von Prof. Dr. M. Clauss am Departement für Kleintiere, Abteilung für Zoo-, Heim-und Wildtiere der Vetsuisse-Fakultät, Universität Zürich

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carisch, L., Müller, D. W. H., Hatt, J.-M., Bingaman Lackey, L., Rensch, E. E., Clauss, M., & Zerbe, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Halle Zoo (DE)
  • World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA); Gland Switzerland
Corresponding author
Clauss, Marcus
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-15
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
74-86
ISSN
0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556554996
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
seasonal variation in mortality, wild ruminants, captive husbandry, reproductive biology, rut, lambing, deer, Bovidae, latitude, climate, life expectancy, zoo animal welfare
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animals, Zoo, Environment, Female, Male, Mortality, Retrospective Studies, Ruminants, Seasons, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review