The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction to Study mRNA Decay: Comparison of Endpoint and Real-Time Methods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Self-citationTwenty-Five Years of Quantitative PCR for Gene Expression Analysis
VanGuilder, H. D., Vrana, K. E., & Freeman, W. M. (2008) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000112776 · Cited by 1,246
Statistical significance of quantitative PCR
Karlen, Y., McNair, A., Perseguers, S., Mazza, C., & Mermod, N. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-131 · Cited by 373
The temporal expression profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice
Talaat, A. M., Lyons, R., Howard, S. T., & Johnston, S. A. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0306023101 · Cited by 363
Guzmán, M., Lo Verme, J., Fu, J., Oveisi, F., Blázquez, C., & Piomelli, D. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m404087200 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmittgen, T. D., Zakrajsek, B. A., Mills, A. G., Gorn, V., Singer, M. J., & Reed, M. W.
- Venue
- Analytical Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194-204
- ISSN
- 0003-2697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123325948
- Cited by
- 1,035
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction to Study mRNA Decay: Comparison of Endpoint and Real-Time Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/abio.2000.4753
- The paper
- Schmittgen, T. D., Zakrajsek, B. A., Mills, A. G., Gorn, V., Singer, M. J., & Reed, M. W. (2000). Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction to Study mRNA Decay: Comparison of Endpoint and Real-Time Methods. Analytical Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.2000.4753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
