Predation as a cost of sexual communication in nocturnal seabirds: an experimental approach using acoustic signals
Abstract
Conspicuous behaviour, such as sexual advertisement, exposes animals to predation; mate attraction thus often conflicts with antipredator behaviour. We investigated whether an avian predator, the brown skua, Catharacta antarctica lönnbergi, uses the mate attraction calls of colonial seabirds, the petrels. The majority of petrels attract mates at night and vocalizations are their main way of communicating. At our study sites, skua predation on nocturnal petrels was heavy, and concentrated particularly on a single species, the blue petrel, Halobaena caerulea. Using playback experiments, we showed that skuas can use male petrel calls as a cue for prey location and selection. This listening behaviour of skuas probably imposes a major constraint on advertising petrels, and especially on single males which face a trade-off between attracting females (which respond by calling in flight) and avoiding predation. We also investigated the consequences of this predation risk on the behaviour of petrels: a second set of playback experiments showed that the most heavily preyed on petrel species could use skua territorial calls to infer predation risk and stop calling thereafter, which may reduce conspicuousness and predation risk. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even in locations where predation does not cause serious reductions in population, the presence of native predators can result in shifts in nest attendance, changes to socialization and breeding behavior, and costly physiological stress responses.
“Even in locations where predation does not cause serious reductions in population, the presence of native predators can result in shifts in nest attendance (Corkery et al. 2015; Marsteller et al. 2024), changes to socialization and breeding behavior (Mougeot and Bretagnolle 2000), and costly physiological stress responses (Schaefer and Colombelli‐Négrel 2021; Geldart et al. 2023).”
From River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America (2025) · cites this paper as Mougeot and Bretagnolle 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America
Stuntz, L., & Orben, R. A. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.72118
- Authors
- Mougeot, F., & Bretagnolle, V.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 647-656
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129731356
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- predation risk, sexual communication, mate attraction, acoustic signals, brown skua, blue petrel, Halobaena caerulea, colonial seabirds, nocturnal vocalization, playback experiments, territorial calls, antipredator behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review