Cited by 0Animal Ecology and Behavior StudiesAvian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overview

River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America

Open access
Stuntz, Luke, Orben, Rachael A.·2025·Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

River otter (Lontra canadensis) predation of seabirds has been periodically documented throughout North America, but most knowledge about this subject exists as anecdotal observations in the memories of experienced seabird biologists. Using surveys, interviews, white papers, and published literature, we collected detailed records of seabird predation by river otters at 73 islands on the coasts of North America. From this dataset, we were able to draw conclusions about the seabird species experiencing river otter predation, the geographic distribution of predation records, and factors associated with river otter occurrence at colony islands. River otters preferentially select for small‐bodied burrow‐nesting species, with predation of ground‐nesting species occurring mostly opportunistically. Predation of nesting seabirds occurs across the entire Pacific range of the river otter and throughout the northern Atlantic, but we did not locate a single record of this behavior on the Atlantic coast south of Maine; we hypothesize that this is due to geographic differences in nesting seabird assemblages. The presence of burrow‐nesting seabirds and proximity to the mainland are both strong predictors of river otter occurrence at colony islands. River otters will swim up to eight kilometers across open ocean to access seabird colonies, but predation is significantly more common at nearshore islands (median distance of 1.7 km). Reports of seabird predation by river otters in published literature are rare, are heavily biased toward an ornithological audience, and have decreased over time as “Field Notes” style publications have decreased in popularity. Despite being more widespread than previously reported, predation by river otters appears to be sustainable for most colony nesting seabird populations.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

River otters depredated nesting seabirds at 73 North American colony islands, preferentially selecting small-bodied burrow-nesting species, with occurrence strongly predicted by burrow-nesting seabirds and proximity to shore. Predation was widespread on the Pacific and northern Atlantic coasts but absent south of Maine on the Atlantic/Gulf coasts, and appears sustainable for most colony-nesting seabird populations.

Key findings

  • Across surveys, interviews, white papers, and literature, the authors identified 73 islands with confirmed river otter predation on nesting seabirds, plus 18 islands with otter activity but no observed predation; full seabird abundance data yielded 377 nesting records across 30 seabird species.
  • In the top prey-selection model, a 100 g increase in seabird body mass corresponded to a 7.7% decrease in odds of predation (95% CI: [−14.7%, −0.3%]); burrow nesters had 2.8× higher odds of predation than surface nesters (95% CI: [1.3×, 6.4×]) with body mass and abundance held constant. Nocturnal provisioning received only weak support (ΔAICc: 1.36) and its coefficient broadly overlapped zero.
  • For otter occurrence at colony islands, odds declined by 19.0% per additional kilometer from shore (95% CI: [−32.6%, −7.8%], p < 0.01), and 69% of activity records came from islands <2 km from shore, though otters were recorded swimming up to 8 km. Presence of burrow-nesting species predicted 19.7× higher odds of otter activity (95% CI: [7.4×, 60.8×], p < 0.001).
  • Predation records were most common in the North Pacific (41% from British Columbia), with no records south of Maine on the Atlantic Coast or in the Gulf of Mexico; only 22 publications mentioned the behavior, just 3 were targeted studies, and none of 16 responding river otter biologists had observed evidence of seabird predation.

Methods

  • The authors collected anecdotal records via biologist surveys, interviews, white papers, agency documents, and non-systematic literature searches, restricting scope to on-land predation at nesting colonies.
  • Prey selection was modeled with logistic regression using all-subsets AICc selection; records were individual seabird species on islands with known otter activity, with covariates for proportional abundance, body mass, nest type, and nocturnal colony attendance.
  • Otter occurrence was modeled by supplementing positive records with 37 actively monitored negative islands; logistic regression covariates included burrow-nesting seabird presence, distance to shore, island size, persistent freshwater, and a freshwater × distance interaction. Publication and specialization biases were assessed by database searches and a survey of 24 river otter biologists (16 responses).

Limitations

  • Stated: mixed sampling positively biased outcomes toward overrepresentation of river otter activity, so the dataset cannot estimate exact probability of otter occurrence; many seabird abundance estimates were more than two decades old; small sample size and highly skewed data mean the 19.7× burrow-nester effect should be interpreted cautiously.
  • Stated: predation records were anecdotal, observation quality varied, and the authors could not enumerate how common certain predatory behaviors were; the literature search was non-systematic, and no quantitative metric of predation impacts was required from survey respondents.
  • Evident: the design is observational and correlational, with binary outcomes rather than quantified predation rates, so it cannot establish causation or precise impact; absence records depend on actively monitored islands, and the geographic absence south of Maine may partly reflect survey reach, though the authors directly contacted over twenty biologists in that region.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.72118

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

17 of 60 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Predation at seabird colonies tends to result in Allee effect dynamics, with birds at smaller colonies experiencing higher rates of predation due to a reduced dilution effect, lower collective vigilance, and less effective group anti-predator defenses.

    “Predation at seabird colonies tends to result in Allee effect dynamics, with birds at smaller colonies experiencing higher rates of predation due to a reduced dilution effect, lower collective vigilance, and less effective group anti‐predator defenses (Schippers et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schippers et al. 2011 source
  • Premisecitation

    River otters can squeeze through openings as tight as 10 cm.

    “river otters can squeeze through openings as tight as 10 cm [Reed‐Smith et al. 2008; Malzahn et al. 2020]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Reed‐Smith et al. 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Malzahn et al. 2020 source

      The Abstract reports an otter using a maternal den entrance 9 cm high and 28 cm wide. Den Structure Characteristics suggests that 10 cm height and width may be potential minimums, but qualifies this because data on den entrances are limited. The source therefore supports passage through a narrow entrance, not the unqualified claim that otters can squeeze through a 10 cm opening. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    This underwater attack strategy is very similar to that observed on freshwater lakes where river otters hunt waterfowl.

    “a very similar strategy that has been observed on freshwater lakes where river otters hunt waterfowl (Reid et al. 1994; Price and Aries 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Reid et al. 1994 source
    • cites Price and Aries 2007 source

      The observation account (pp. 325–326) describes otters diving toward cormorants in marine waters. The discussion reports otters preying on moulting waterfowl on a freshwater lake, but does not describe how they attacked there, so it does not establish that the underwater strategies were very similar. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingreasoning

    Reports of seabird predation by river otters in published literature are rare.

    “Reports of seabird predation by river otters in published literature are rare, are heavily biased toward an ornithological audience, and have decreased over time as “Field Notes” style publications have decreased in popularity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Predation by river otters is significantly more common at nearshore islands (median distance of 1.7 km).

    “predation is significantly more common at nearshore islands (median distance of 1.7 km)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 37
  • May combine two claims. 60
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Seabirds are among the most threatened groups of birds, with anthropogenic impacts resulting in population declines for the majority of species.

    “Seabirds are among the most threatened groups of birds, with anthropogenic impacts resulting in population declines for the majority of species (Croxall et al. 2012; Dias et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Croxall et al. 2012 source

      The Status section says seabirds are more threatened than comparable bird groups, and the Threats section identifies several human-related pressures. The Trends section reports declines in 47% of all seabird species, or 52% of species with known trends. Thus, the claim's “majority of species” wording is supported only if limited to species with known trends; the paper does not establish that anthropogenic impacts caused every reported decline. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Dias et al. 2019 source

      The Introduction (p. 3) supports the statement that seabirds are among the most threatened groups of birds and identifies threats driving declines. But it reports declining population trends for 47% of species—almost half, not the claimed majority. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Arctic foxes and polar bears often overlap in habitat use with nesting seabirds at islands and mainland sites throughout the Arctic, where they will occasionally forage on eggs, chicks, and adult seabirds.

    “For example, arctic foxes ( Vulpes lagopus ) (e.g., Larson 1960; Eide et al. 2005) and polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ) (e.g., Stempniewicz 1993; Dey et al. 2020) often overlap in habitat use with nesting seabirds at islands and mainland sites throughout the Arctic, where they will occasionally forage on eggs, chicks, and adult seabirds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Larson 1960 source
    • cites Eide et al. 2005 source
    • cites Stempniewicz 1993 source

      The opening passage (p. 1) says polar bears often visit Arctic islands with seabird colonies. The paper’s summary (p. 1) and Observations (p. 2) document bears eating little auk eggs, chicks, and adults at one island colony. It does not establish the polar-bear claim for mainland sites throughout the Arctic. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The damaging effects of introduced predators on nesting seabirds at offshore colony islands has led to an implicit assumption in much of the published literature that terrestrial carnivores and colonial seabirds cannot coexist.

    “The damaging effects of introduced predators on nesting seabirds at offshore colony islands has led to an implicit assumption in much of the published literature that terrestrial carnivores and colonial seabirds cannot coexist (Courchamp et al. 2003; Hays and Conant 2007; Croxall et al. 2012; Nogales et al. 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Courchamp et al. 2003 source
    • cites Hays and Conant 2007 source

      The “Impact on Bird Populations” section reports probable mongoose-driven extinction of the Jamaica petrel and evidence of predation on Hawaiian petrels. It does not discuss offshore colony islands or say that the published literature assumes terrestrial carnivores and colonial seabirds cannot coexist; it also describes some ground-nesting birds persisting alongside mongooses. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Croxall et al. 2012 source

      The Threats section (page not provided) identifies invasive species at breeding sites as a major threat to seabirds, supporting the claim about damaging effects. It does not say that published literature assumes terrestrial carnivores and colonial seabirds cannot coexist, or that predator impacts led to such an assumption. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Studies of river otter foraging strategies in primary freshwater habitats have shown that river otters consistently select for larger-bodied fish within individual taxa.

    “This result initially appears to contrast with studies of river otter foraging strategies in their primary freshwater habitats, where river otters have been shown to consistently select for larger‐bodied fish within individual taxa (Hansen 2003; Cote et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hansen 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Cote et al. 2008 source

      The Results report that larger individuals of each fish taxon were more common in otter scats than in samples of available fish. But this study examined marine-coastal habitats in Newfoundland, not primary freshwater habitats, so it does not establish the claim about freshwater studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Almost all seabird species have low reproductive rates and long lifespans, and these traits amplify the effects of additive sources of mortality on long-term population trajectories.

    “Almost all seabird species have low reproductive rates and long lifespans (Hamer et al. 2001), and these traits amplify the effects of additive sources of mortality on long‐term population trajectories (Purvis et al. 2000; Sæther and Bakke 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hamer et al. 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Purvis et al. 2000 source
    • cites Sæther and Bakke 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    River otter predation of nesting seabirds occurs on both coasts of North America, with some records indicating the predation of hundreds of nesting seabirds from a single colony.

    “Regardless, this behavior occurs on both coasts of North America, with some records indicating the predation of hundreds of nesting seabirds from a single colony (e.g., Quinlan 1983; Hoeg et al. 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Quinlan 1983 source
    • cites Hoeg et al. 2021 source

      The study-site description (p. 120) says river otters have appeared at the two Nova Scotia colonies and have killed Leach’s Storm Petrels. The Abstract estimates 4,000 petrels depredated annually at one colony, but does not attribute those deaths to otters; most identified predation was by gulls or owls. Hoeg et al. therefore supports otter predation on the Atlantic coast, not hundreds of seabirds killed by otters at a single colony. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Even in locations where predation does not cause serious reductions in population, the presence of native predators can result in shifts in nest attendance, changes to socialization and breeding behavior, and costly physiological stress responses.

    “Even in locations where predation does not cause serious reductions in population, the presence of native predators can result in shifts in nest attendance (Corkery et al. 2015; Marsteller et al. 2024), changes to socialization and breeding behavior (Mougeot and Bretagnolle 2000), and costly physiological stress responses (Schaefer and Colombelli‐Négrel 2021; Geldart et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Corkery et al. 2015 source
    • cites Marsteller et al. 2024 source
    • cites Mougeot and Bretagnolle 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Seabird predation by invasive American mink has received extensive attention in Europe, but this has not been the subject of a comprehensive review in North America.

    “Seabird predation by invasive American mink has received extensive attention in Europe (Craik 1997; Banks et al. 2008), but this has not been the subject of a comprehensive review in North America.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Craik 1997 source
    • cites Banks et al. 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    River otters generally select for benthic, slow-moving aquatic prey available in high abundance, suggesting that they rely on a "risk averse" foraging strategy that focuses on consistently catchable prey rather than targeting species that might provide a greater energetic reward per capture.

    “River otters generally select for benthic, slow‐moving aquatic prey available in high abundance (Ryder 1955; Cote et al. 2008; Day et al. 2015), suggesting that they rely on a “risk averse” foraging strategy that focuses on consistently catchable prey rather than targeting species that might provide a greater energetic reward per capture (Pyke 1984).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ryder 1955 source
    • cites Cote et al. 2008 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Day et al. 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The role of terrestrial mammals in coastal systems has generally been understudied.

    “The role of terrestrial mammals in coastal systems has generally been understudied (Carlton and Hodder 2003), and the anecdotal knowledge of seabird biologists on a suite of native terrestrial species remains an underexplored scientific resource.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carlton and Hodder 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Reports of seabird predation by river otters in published literature have decreased over time as "Field Notes" style publications have decreased in popularity.

    “Reports of seabird predation by river otters in published literature are rare, are heavily biased toward an ornithological audience, and have decreased over time as “Field Notes” style publications have decreased in popularity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The presence of burrow-nesting seabirds and proximity to the mainland are both strong predictors of river otter occurrence at colony islands.

    “The presence of burrow‐nesting seabirds and proximity to the mainland are both strong predictors of river otter occurrence at colony islands.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Predation of nesting seabirds by river otters occurs across the entire Pacific range of the river otter and throughout the northern Atlantic.

    “Predation of nesting seabirds occurs across the entire Pacific range of the river otter and throughout the northern Atlantic, but we did not locate a single record of this behavior on the Atlantic coast south of Maine; we hypothesize that this is due to geographic differences in nesting seabird assemblages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    River otters preferentially select for small-bodied burrow-nesting species, with predation of ground-nesting species occurring mostly opportunistically.

    “River otters preferentially select for small‐bodied burrow‐nesting species, with predation of ground‐nesting species occurring mostly opportunistically.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Reports of seabird predation by river otters in published literature are heavily biased toward an ornithological audience.

    “Reports of seabird predation by river otters in published literature are rare, are heavily biased toward an ornithological audience, and have decreased over time as “Field Notes” style publications have decreased in popularity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    River otter predation of burrow-nesting species was reported to be fairly common, but the specific mode of predation varied.

    “While river otter predation of burrow‐nesting species was reported to be fairly common, the specific mode of predation varied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Four surveyed biologists suggested river otters would be unable or unwilling to swim more than 500 m to access a seabird colony island.

    “four biologists suggested that river otters would be unable or unwilling to swim more than 500 m to access a seabird colony island”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The survey received responses from 16 of 24 river otter biologists throughout North America, who collectively have authorship on 92 unique publications about river otter ecology.

    “We distributed surveys to 24 river otter biologists throughout North America, and we received responses from 16 of these biologists, who collectively have authorship on 92 unique publications about river otter ecology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    At many sites, river otters were reported to consistently use specific access paths onto the islands and developed well-established trails.

    “At many of these sites, river otters were reported to consistently use specific access paths onto the islands and developed well‐established trails.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In most cases where river otters were not living full-time on the island, river otters made repeated visits to the colony throughout the breeding season to depredate seabirds; one-off instances of predation seem to be quite rare.

    “In most cases where river otters were not living full‐time on the island, however, river otters made repeated visits to the colony throughout the breeding season to depredate seabirds; one‐off instances of predation seem to be quite rare.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Five surveyed biologists predicted the upper threshold for river otter swim distance to seabird colony islands would be between five and ten kilometers.

    “five other biologists predicted (remarkably accurately) that the upper threshold for this distance would be between five and ten kilometers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After accounting for abundance and body mass, river otters show a strong preference for burrow-nesting species over all other types of nesters; with body mass and abundance held constant, burrow nesters have 2.8 times higher odds of being depredated than surface nesters, though the uncertainty around this odds ratio is broad (95% CI: [1.3×, 6.4×]).

    “After accounting for abundance and body mass, river otters show a strong preference for burrow‐nesting species over all other types of nesters; with body mass and abundance held constant, burrow nesters have 2.8 times higher odds of being depredated than surface nesters, though the uncertainty around this odds ratio is broad (95% CI: [1.3×, 6.4×]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Many of the contacted biologists had decades of field experience working with nesting seabirds, and not a single individual spoken with had ever observed river otter predation in these areas.

    “Many of these biologists had decades of field experience working with nesting seabirds, and not a single individual we spoke with had ever observed river otter predation in these areas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 22 publications, 13 were secondary anecdotal mentions, six were field-note style publications, and three were primary field research on river otter predation of nesting seabirds.

    “Thirteen of these were secondary anecdotal mentions (often just a single sentence) in seabird population studies, six were “field note” style publications, and in just three instances was river otter predation of nesting seabirds an intentional subject of primary field research (Verbeek and Morgan 1978; Quinlan 1983; Carter et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Verbeek and Morgan 1978 source
    • cites Quinlan 1983 source
    • cites Carter et al. 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The amount of writing on seabird predation by river otters has clearly declined, associated with the progressive disappearance of field-note style publications in journals.

    “While many of these records were published in the last twenty years, the progressive disappearance of “field note” style publications in journals has resulted in a clear decline in the amount of writing on this subject (Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors gathered records of river otter and American mink overlap for sites in Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and Maine-with many seabird biologists reporting that mink were a more important management issue than river otters.

    “We gathered records of this overlap for sites in Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and Maine—with many seabird biologists reporting that mink were a more important management issue than river otters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors collected just 6 records of river otters hunting seabirds at colonies lacking burrow nesters, with all of these observations from river otters hunting glaucous-winged gulls in the Salish Sea of British Columbia and Washington.

    “We collected just 6 records of river otters hunting seabirds at colonies lacking burrow nesters, with all of these observations from river otters hunting glaucous‐winged gulls in the Salish Sea of British Columbia and Washington (Figure 3b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    River otter biologists generally agreed that seabird predation would not be dramatically outside their expectations, despite river otters' typical niche as aquatic predators.

    “Despite this absence of reported observations, river otter biologists generally agreed with the notion that seabird predation would not be dramatically outside their expectations, despite river otters' typical niche as aquatic predators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nine of the references came from ornithological journals and another nine came from regionally restricted natural history journals.

    “Additionally, nine of these references came from ornithological journals, while another nine came from regionally restricted natural history journals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Biologists from both Rhode Island and Georgia reported that while river otters never depredate nesting seabirds despite their presence in the area, mink are active predators at these sites.

    “Biologists from both Rhode Island and Georgia reported that while river otters never depredate nesting seabirds despite their presence in the area, mink are active predators at these sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors collected multiple records of river otter activity at seabird colony islands in both Massachusetts and South Carolina, but predation was not observed at any of these sites.

    “We did collect multiple records of river otter activity at seabird colony islands in both Massachusetts and South Carolina, but predation was not observed at any of these sites.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Six surveyed biologists referenced river otter predation on rafting and nesting waterfowl.

    “In their comments, six different biologists made reference to river otter predation on rafting and nesting waterfowl, and these biologists suggested that such behavior would likely translate to a coastal context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Those biologists suggested that river otter predation on waterfowl would likely translate to a coastal context.

    “In their comments, six different biologists made reference to river otter predation on rafting and nesting waterfowl, and these biologists suggested that such behavior would likely translate to a coastal context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The presence of burrow-nesting species was very strongly associated with river otter occurrence; the top model predicted that the odds of river otter activity are 19.7× higher for islands with burrow-nesting species (95% odds ratio CI: [7.4×, 60.8×], p < 0.001), though effect sizes estimated from such a highly skewed sample should be interpreted with caution.

    “The presence of burrow‐nesting species was very strongly associated with river otter occurrence; our top model predicted that the odds of river otter activity are 19.7× higher for islands with burrow‐nesting species (95% odds ratio CI: [7.4×, 60.8×], (p < 0.001)), though effect sizes estimated from such a highly skewed sample should be interpreted with caution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    At many other storm-petrel colonies where river otter predation was fairly well observed, burrow excavation never occurred, and river otters exclusively killed adult birds outside of their burrows.

    “At many other storm‐petrel colonies where river otter predation was fairly well observed, burrow excavation never occurred, and river otters exclusively killed adult birds outside of their burrows.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    When hunting larger surface-nesting species such as gulls, predation of both chicks and eggs seems to be relatively common, despite previous reports that river otters avoid consuming bird eggs.

    “When hunting larger surface‐nesting species such as gulls, predation of both chicks and eggs seems to be relatively common (see Rodway et al. 2024 for examples), despite previous reports that river otters avoid consuming bird eggs (Hansen 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rodway et al. 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hansen 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    At one site in British Columbia, river otters regularly entered artificial nest boxes to depredate pigeon guillemots, but this was effectively prevented by later reducing the diameter of nest box entrances.

    “At one site in British Columbia, river otters regularly entered artificial nest boxes to depredate pigeon guillemots, but this was effectively prevented by later reducing the diameter of nest box entrances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Seabird predation by river otters appears to be most common in the North Pacific (41% of records are from British Columbia), but this behavior occurs throughout the Pacific coast and in the northern Atlantic.

    “Seabird predation by river otters appears to be most common in the North Pacific (41% of our records are from British Columbia), but this behavior occurs throughout the Pacific coast and in the northern Atlantic (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors acquired full species abundance data for 79 of these islands, resulting in a final model dataset with a total sample size of 377 nesting records across 30 different seabird species.

    “We were able to acquire full species abundance data for 79 of these islands, resulting in a final model dataset with a total sample size of 377 nesting records across 30 different seabird species.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    It superficially appears that permanent or extended seasonal residence was more common on islands with sources of persistent freshwater, but the authors do not have sufficient data to quantitatively assess this.

    “It superficially appears that permanent or extended seasonal residence was more common on islands with sources of persistent freshwater, but we do not have sufficient data on river otter residence patterns to quantitatively assess this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Some anecdotal records report river otters scaling remarkably steep cliffs to access nesting areas, but it is logical that these predators would concentrate their foraging efforts on seabirds inhabiting flat areas of colony islands.

    “Some anecdotal records report river otters scaling remarkably steep cliffs to access nesting areas, but it is logical that these predators would concentrate their foraging efforts on seabirds inhabiting flat areas of colony islands.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Many anecdotal reports describe a similar pattern of river otters making nightly trips to seabird colony islands.

    “many anecdotal reports we received describe a similar pattern.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    River otters coexist with seabirds at many sites in North America without exhibiting any predatory tendencies, instead using the coasts of seabird islands as foraging grounds for their typical marine prey.

    “River otters coexist with seabirds at many sites in North America without exhibiting any predatory tendencies, instead using the coasts of seabird islands as foraging grounds for their typical marine prey (Rodway et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rodway et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Through the course of this project, the authors spoke with over fifty active seabird biologists who have documented seabird predation by river otters, but there have been just 306 words published on the subject in the last decade.

    “Through the course of this project, we spoke with over fifty active seabird biologists who have documented seabird predation by river otters, but there have been just 306 words published on the subject in the last decade.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Seabird biologists seem to observe predation by river otters fairly frequently, but they very rarely study river otter behavior in a targeted manner or include their observations in publications.

    “Seabird biologists seem to observe predation by river otters fairly frequently, but they very rarely study river otter behavior in a targeted manner or include their observations in publications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    There are very few references to river otter predation of nesting seabirds in the literature, particularly in wildlife management journals, yet it is a fairly common occurrence in areas with large populations of burrow-nesting seabirds.

    “There are very few references to this species interaction in the literature (particularly in wildlife management journals), yet it is a fairly common occurrence in areas with large populations of burrow‐nesting seabirds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The authors received many anecdotal reports of river otters hunting much larger species on the water, including murres, cormorants, and pelicans.

    “While successfully killing large seabirds on land may be challenging for river otters, we received many anecdotal reports of river otters hunting much larger species on the water, including murres, cormorants, and pelicans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Salish Sea is the only known location in the world where river otters have been consistently observed to visit islands to exclusively hunt a surface-nesting species (glaucous-winged gulls), with local reports for at least the last 60 years.

    “The Salish Sea is the only known location in the world where river otters have been consistently observed to visit islands to exclusively hunt a surface‐nesting species (glaucous‐winged gulls), and there have been local reports of this behavior for at least the last 60 years (Kennedy 1968; Rodway et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kennedy 1968

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Rodway et al. 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Our modeling did not show any convincing evidence that island size or the presence of persistent freshwater increase the likelihood of river otters accessing a seabird colony island.

    “Our modeling did not show any convincing evidence that island size or the presence of persistent freshwater increase the likelihood of river otters accessing a seabird colony island.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Very few seabird biologists who had direct experience with river otter predation suggested that river otters represented a serious threat to the future of the colonies they study.

    “That being said, very few seabird biologists who had direct experience with river otter predation suggested that river otters represented a serious threat to the future of the colonies they study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The management of river otters in the United States typically falls under the purview of furbearer biologists working for state wildlife agencies, but the survey work suggests that this population has limited information about the behavior of river otters at coastal islands.

    “The management of river otters in the United States typically falls under the purview of furbearer biologists working for state wildlife agencies, but our survey work suggests that this population has limited information about the behavior of river otters at coastal islands.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In these cases, river otters swam underwater and attacked seabirds from below, restraining their legs in their jaws and drowning them before returning to shore to consume the carcass.

    “In these cases, river otters swam underwater and attacked seabirds from below, restraining their legs in their jaws and drowning them before returning to shore to consume the carcass—a very similar strategy that has been observed on freshwater lakes where river otters hunt waterfowl (Reid et al. 1994; Price and Aries 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Biologists reported high rates of predation on storm-petrels with limited or no evidence of burrow excavation, suggesting river otters often hunt adult birds on the ground outside of burrows.

    “In many cases, however, biologists reported high rates of predation on storm‐petrels with limited or no evidence of burrow excavation—suggesting that river otters often hunt adult birds on the ground outside of burrows.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most journal articles mentioning seabird predation by river otters were from specialist or local journals, and very few articles mention the subject in their abstract.

    “Most journal articles mentioning seabird predation by river otters were from specialist or local journals, and very few articles mention the subject in their abstract.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    River otter biologists that were surveyed anticipated the ability of river otters to adapt to hunt seabirds in a coastal context, but they generally seemed to underestimate how valuable a foraging opportunity a densely nested seabird colony represents.

    “River otter biologists that we surveyed anticipated the ability of river otters to adapt to hunt seabirds in a coastal context, but they generally seemed to underestimate how valuable a foraging opportunity a densely nested seabird colony represents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Almost the entirety of existing knowledge on seabird predation by river otters seems to lie with seabird biologists; there are no notable publications on the subject by river otter biologists, and the authors did not obtain any new records of seabird predation from the river otter biologists they interviewed.

    “Almost the entirety of existing knowledge on seabird predation by river otters seems to lie with seabird biologists; there are no notable publications on the subject by river otter biologists, and we did not obtain any new records of seabird predation from the river otter biologists we interviewed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In general, publications mentioning this behavior are sparse, declining in frequency, and difficult to opportunistically discover.

    “In general, publications mentioning this behavior are sparse, declining in frequency, and difficult to opportunistically discover.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The absence of river otter predation records on the Atlantic coast south of Maine is due to geographic differences in nesting seabird assemblages.

    “we hypothesize that this is due to geographic differences in nesting seabird assemblages”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Many estimates of seabird abundance for the islands were more than two decades old, but the authors used the newest available data wherever possible.

    “It should be noted that many estimates of seabird abundance for these islands were more than two decades old, but we used the newest available data wherever possible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    River otters readily forage on marine resources, and coastal areas can have higher population densities than freshwater habitats.

    “Despite the implications of their common name, river otters readily forage on marine resources, and coastal areas can have higher population densities than freshwater habitats (Blundell et al. 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Blundell et al. 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The authors asked seabird biologists to report the number of years and weeks per year spent conducting field research on the island to determine whether detections of river otter activity were biased by monitoring intensity.

    “We also asked seabird biologists to report the number of years and weeks per year that they spent conducting field research on the island to determine whether detections of river otter activity were biased by monitoring intensity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The authors used an all-subsets model selection approach with AICc as selection criteria to account for limited sample size.

    “We used an all‐subsets model selection approach (due to the small model set), with Akaike's Corrected Information Criterion (AICc) as our selection criteria to account for our limited sample size (Hurvich and Tsai 1989).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hurvich and Tsai 1989 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    To ensure that the absence of predation records was not due to geographic bias in survey distribution channels, the authors directly reached out to over twenty state, federal, academic, and nonprofit biologists working throughout the region.

    “To ensure that this absence of predation records was not due to geographic bias in our survey distribution channels, we directly reached out to over twenty state, federal, academic, and nonprofit biologists working throughout this region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Due to the mixed sampling approach, the reported outcomes are positively biased towards the overrepresentation of river otter activity, and the dataset cannot be used to estimate the exact probability of river otters occurring at seabird colony islands.

    “Due to our mixed sampling approach, our reported outcomes are positively biased towards the overrepresentation of river otter activity, and this dataset cannot be used to estimate the exact probability of river otters occurring at seabird colony islands.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    River otters primarily hunt fish and crustaceans, but their dietary composition generally tracks the abundance of available prey, and they have been observed to take large amounts of amphibians, mammals, and birds in specific circumstances.

    “River otters primarily hunt fish and crustaceans, but their dietary composition generally tracks the abundance of available prey, and they have been observed to take large amounts of amphibians, mammals, and birds in specific circumstances (Kruuk 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kruuk 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The true magnitude of the distance effect may be masked by seabirds actively selecting against nesting on islands very close to shore (within 2 km) due to high threat of predation by native terrestrial mammals.

    “the true magnitude of this distance effect may be masked by the fact that seabirds could be actively selecting against nesting on islands that are very close to shore (within 2 km) due to the high threat of predation by native terrestrial mammals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This project highlights the importance of drawing on the knowledge of taxa-specific experts to understand the behavior of certain species at the edge of their typical niche.

    “Perhaps more than anything, this project highlights the importance of drawing on the knowledge of taxa‐specific experts to understand the behavior of certain species at the edge of their typical niche.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    River otters have been underacknowledged as a native predator of nesting seabirds throughout North America.

    “River otters have been underacknowledged as a native predator of nesting seabirds throughout North America.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This suggests that specialized seabird predation can be a locally learned and socially transmitted behavior, enabling certain populations to use an alternative prey resource.

    “This suggests that specialized seabird predation can be a locally learned and socially transmitted behavior, enabling certain populations to use an alternative prey resource.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The anecdotal knowledge of seabird biologists on a suite of native terrestrial species remains an underexplored scientific resource.

    “the anecdotal knowledge of seabird biologists on a suite of native terrestrial species remains an underexplored scientific resource.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These preferred prey species likely have a higher capture rate and require less energy to hunt, making it more likely for river otters to behaviorally adapt to include seabirds in their diet.

    “These preferred prey species likely have a higher capture rate and require less energy to hunt, making it more likely for river otters to behaviorally adapt to include seabirds in their diet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Prey response may also partially explain the lack of preference for nocturnally provisioning seabirds-if predator vigilance is reduced in diurnal species during the night, hunting success rates for nocturnally hunting river otters would be comparatively increased.

    “Prey response may also partially explain the lack of preference for nocturnally provisioning seabirds—if predator vigilance is reduced in diurnal species during the night, hunting success rates for nocturnally hunting river otters would be comparatively increased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Due to the nocturnal behavior of otters and their typically transient appearance at islands, diagnosing them as a source of predation can be difficult-particularly when islands are only visited for periodic censuses of seabird populations.

    “Due to the nocturnal behavior of otters and their typically transient appearance at islands, diagnosing them as a source of predation can be difficult—particularly when islands are only visited for periodic censuses of seabird populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    While river otters will take larger-bodied surface-nesting species, the anecdotal reports collected suggest this is primarily an opportunistic behavior exhibited at islands with an abundance of preferred prey.

    “While river otters will take larger‐bodied surface‐nesting species, the anecdotal reports we collected suggest that this is primarily an opportunistic behavior exhibited at islands with an abundance of preferred prey.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The stark geographic split in the occurrence of predation is primarily the result of species assemblages at seabird islands on the Atlantic coast.

    “Instead, we hypothesize that this stark geographic split in the occurrence of predation is primarily the result of species assemblages at seabird islands on the Atlantic coast.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Locomotion and foraging may be more challenging in boulder fields and rocky scree than in flat vegetated areas, and guillemots at many islands will congregate on steep cliffs that may be fully inaccessible to river otters.

    “Locomotion and foraging may be more challenging in boulder fields and rocky scree than in flat vegetated areas, and guillemots at many islands will congregate on steep cliffs that may be fully inaccessible to river otters (Oakley 1981).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oakley 1981

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Seabird colonies represent a habitat at the very edge of a river otter's niche, and they provide a unique insight into the extreme adaptability of this generalist predator.

    “Seabird colonies represent a habitat at the very edge of a river otter's niche, and they provide a unique insight into the extreme adaptability of this generalist predator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This could allow for sustained foraging on burrow-nesting species, whereas making repeated kills on surface nesters during a single hunting bout seems more unlikely.

    “This could allow for sustained foraging on burrow‐nesting species, whereas making repeated kills on surface nesters during a single hunting bout seems more unlikely.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The only burrow-nesting species with colonies on the Atlantic coast are Leach's storm-petrels and Atlantic puffins, and the most southern major colony of either is located in St. George, Maine.

    “The only burrow‐nesting species with colonies on the Atlantic coast are Leach's storm‐petrels and Atlantic puffins, and the most southern major colony of either of these species is located in St. George, Maine (Lowther et al. 2020; Pollet et al. 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lowther et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Pollet et al. 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The absence of seabird predation south of Maine may be partially due to a lower density of both seabird colonies and coastal river otters in the region, but this seems an insufficient explanation for the complete absence.

    “This may be partially due to a lower density of both seabird colonies and coastal river otters in the region (compared to the Pacific coast and northern Atlantic), but this seems to be an insufficient explanation for the complete absence of any observed seabird predation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Collective vigilance is likely further limited during incubation when adults remain in their burrows for much of the day, and adults are unlikely to collectively flush from their burrows in response to a single predation attempt.

    “Collective vigilance is likely further limited during incubation when adults remain in their burrows for much of the day, and adults are unlikely to collectively flush from their burrows in response to a single predation attempt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Burrow-nesting species have not been shown to demonstrate coordinated group responses to terrestrial predators.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It appears that while gulls, terns, and murres may be suitable prey, it is not possible for river otters in most areas to become efficient enough hunters of surface nesters for them to become a primary prey item.

    “It appears that while gulls, terns, and murres may be suitable prey, it is not possible for river otters in most areas to become efficient enough hunters of surface nesters for them to become a primary prey item.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While river otters will opportunistically take surface-nesting seabirds in areas with dense burrow-nesting colonies, the species assemblages south of Maine do not offer a valuable enough food resource for river otters to specialize as seabird predators.

    “While river otters will opportunistically take surface‐nesting seabirds in areas with dense burrow‐nesting colonies, it appears that the species assemblages south of Maine do not offer a valuable enough food resource for river otters to specialize as seabird predators.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
83 of 83
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most knowledge about river otter predation of seabirds exists as anecdotal observations in the memories of experienced seabird biologists.

    “most knowledge about this subject exists as anecdotal observations in the memories of experienced seabird biologists”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Differences in overall predation frequency between seabird species are likely to be driven by distribution and abundance, rather than preferential selection by river otters.

    “Differences in overall predation frequency between seabird species are likely to be driven by distribution and abundance, rather than preferential selection by river otters.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Islands with established and active field research programs have sufficient monitoring to detect any ongoing river otter activity.

    “we sought to identify islands with established and active field research programs, such that there would be sufficient monitoring from biologists to detect any ongoing river otter activity”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Biologists' anecdotal reports of river otter activity and predation are accurate enough to use as data.

    “To collect anecdotal records of seabird predation by river otters, we built a short survey for biologists to provide details about their observations in the field”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The species range of river otters excludes Nunavut, the Aleutian Islands, and the Pribilof Islands.

    “Seabird colonies located in Nunavut, the Aleutian Islands, and the Pribilof Islands were considered out of the species range for river otters and were excluded from consideration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Burrow-nesting species have not been shown to demonstrate coordinated group responses to terrestrial predators.

    “burrow‐nesting species have not been shown to demonstrate this type of coordinated group response to terrestrial predators.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nesting season for seabirds in North America generally spans from March to August.

    “the nesting season for seabirds in North America generally spans from March to August”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Freshwater foraging should be relatively efficient during the seabird nesting season (March to August).

    “when freshwater foraging should be relatively efficient.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Island size and the presence of persistent freshwater increase the suitability of an island for long-term residence by river otters.

    “Both of these hypotheses were made on the assumption that these factors would increase the suitability of an island for long‐term residence by river otters.”
9 of 9

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Banks P. B., 2008, Impacts of Alien Mink Predation on Island Vertebrate Communities of the Baltic Sea Archipelago: Review of a Long‐Term Experimental Study, Boreal Environment Research, 13, 3
  2. Billerman S. M., 2022, Birds of the World
  3. Blundell G. M., 2000, Effects of Food Resources on Spacing Behavior of River Otters: Does Forage Abundance Control Home‐Range Size?, Biotelemetry, 15, 325
  4. Bowyer R. T., 2003, Effects of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill on River Otters: Injury and Recovery of a Sentinel Species, Wildlife Monographs, 153, 1
  5. Cairns D., 1980, Nesting Density, Habitat Structure and Human Disturbance as Factors in Black Guillemot Reproduction, Wilson Bulletin, 92, 352
  6. Carroll T., 2024, North American River Otter (Lontra canadensis) Predation on Brown Pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis) at Abbotts Lagoon, Point Reyes National Seashore
  7. Carter H. R., 2012, Historical Colony Status and Recent Extirpations of Burrow‐Nesting Seabirds at Seabird Rocks, British Columbia, Wildlife Afield, 9, 13
  8. Hamer K. C., 2001, Biology of Marine Birds, 217
  9. Hansen H., 2003, Food Habits of the North American River Otter (Lontra Canadensis), River Otter Journal, 12, 1
  10. Kennedy K., 1968, River Otter Feeding on Glaucous‐Winged Gull, Blue Jay, 26, 109
  11. Melquist W., 1983, Ecology of River Otters in West Central Idaho, Wildlife Monographs, 83, 1
  12. Oakley K. L., 1981, Determinants of Population Size of Pigeon Guillemots (Cepphus columba) at Nake Island, Prince William Sound, Alaska
  13. Reed‐Smith J., 2008, North American River Otter Husbandry Notebook
  14. Rodway M. S., 2020, Seabird Colonies of British Columbia: Outer Coast, Wildlife Afield, 17, 1
  15. Rodway M. S., 2024, Seabird Colonies of British Columbia: Salish Sea, Wildlife Afield, 18, 1
  16. Tarasoff F. J.1972.Anatomy of the River Otter Sea Otter and Harp Seal. [dissertation]. Montreal (QC): McGill University.

Authors
Stuntz, L., & Orben, R. A.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Stuntz, Luke
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-09
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
e72118-e72118
ISSN
2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414169375
Cited by
0
References
48
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (F22AC01470‐00)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
river otter, Lutra canadensis, seabird predation, seabird colonies, burrow-nesting seabirds, North American coast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review