Common ravens, Corvus corax, preferentially associate with grey wolves, Canis lupus, as a foraging strategy in winter
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Yellowstone National Park, ravens are the most numerous scavengers of wolf-acquired carrion.
“In YNP, ravens are the most numerous scavengers of wolf‐acquired carrion (Stahler et al., 2002).”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
In areas away from anthropogenic resources, raven populations often rely on food subsidies provided by large predators, particularly in winter.
“In areas away from anthropogenic resources, raven populations often rely on food subsidies provided by large predators, particularly in winter, and ravens are ubiquitous scavengers at wolf kills throughout North America (Kaczensky, Hayes, & Promberger, 2005; Stahler et al., 2002; Vucetich, Peterson, & Waite, 2004).”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
In areas where ravens overlap with wolves, ravens are numerous and ubiquitous scavengers of wolf-acquired carrion.
“In areas where they overlap with wolves, however, ravens are numerous and ubiquitous scavengers of wolf‐acquired carrion.”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
Winter-kill, even when available, would not have benefitted ravens in the same way that wolf-acquired carrion does; ravens locate and forage from wolf-acquired carcasses almost immediately, but they can take significantly longer to find and feed from non-wolf-acquired carrion.
“Furthermore, winter‐kill, even when available, would not have benefitted ravens in the same way that wolf‐acquired carrion does; ravens locate and forage from wolf‐acquired carcasses on the Northern Range almost immediately, but they can take significantly longer to find and feed from non‐wolf‐acquired carrion (Stahler et al., 2002).”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
The pattern of ravens being highly associated with wolves has held true in Yellowstone since the wolf reintroduction in 1995-1997.
“and this pattern has held true in Yellowstone since the wolf reintroduction in 1995–1997 (Stahler et al., 2002).”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
The latter possibility would be most likely in cases where territorial adult ravens are the primary predators.
“The latter possibility would be most likely in cases where territorial adult ravens, which come to closely associate with nearby wolves (Stahler et al., 2002), are the primary predators [e.g., as with desert tortoise (Boarman, 2003) and greater sage grouse (Bui et al., 2010)].”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
Territorial ravens across the Northern Range are relatively familiar with the local wolf packs and are able to locate and scavenge from wolf-acquired carcasses almost immediately.
“In contrast to birds in human‐use areas, territorial ravens across the Northern Range are relatively familiar with the local wolf packs and are able to locate and scavenge from wolf‐acquired carcasses almost immediately (Stahler et al., 2002).”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
Ravens are more likely to be found in the vicinity of wolves than elsewhere on the landscape, especially when wolves are traveling or chasing prey.
“Ravens are more likely to be found in the vicinity of wolves than elsewhere on the landscape, especially when wolves are traveling or chasing prey”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
Ravens can find wolf-acquired carcasses much faster than other carrion on the landscape.
“allowing these scavengers to find wolf‐acquired carcasses much faster than other carrion on the landscape (Stahler et al., 2002).”
From Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves (2018) · cites this paper as Stahler et al., 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wilmers, C. C., Crabtree, R. L., Smith, D. W., Murphy, K. M., & Getz, W. M. (2003) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00766.x · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Self-citationFactors affecting carcass use by a guild of scavengers in European temperate woodland
Selva, N., Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., & Wajrak, A. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z05-158 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Simulating the effects of wolf-elk population dynamics on resource flow to scavengers.
Wilmers, C. C., & Getz, W. M. (2004) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.02.007 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Effect of raven Corvus corax scavenging on the kill rates of wolf Canis lupus packs
Kaczensky, P., Hayes, R. D., & Promberger, C. (2005) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2005)11[101:eorccs]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Di Lascio, F., Nyffeler, F., Bshary, R., & Bugnyar, T. (2013) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0548-0 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Population responses of common ravens to reintroduced gray wolves
Walker, L. E., Marzluff, J. M., Metz, M. C., Wirsing, A. J., Moskal, L. M., Stahler, D. R., & Smith, D. W. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4583 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Stahler, D., Heinrich, B., & Smith, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- Yellowstone National Park (US)
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 283-290
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093290582
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Animal Behavior Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- Corvus corax, grey wolf, wolf, kleptoparasitism, scavenging, social foraging, predator-prey association, winter foraging, coyote, elk, foraging efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review