Cited by 50Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorPlant and animal studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonelemental visual learning in honeybees

Schubert, Marco, Lachnit, Harald, Francucci, Silvia, Giurfa, Martin·2002·Animal Behaviour

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/anbe.2002.3055

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schubert, M., Lachnit, H., Francucci, S., & Giurfa, M.
Affiliations
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
175-184
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983561878
Cited by
50
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
Keywords
Apis mellifera, visual learning, visual discrimination, configural processing, biconditional discrimination, negative patterning, foraging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review