The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling the Components of Plant Respiration: Some Guiding Principles
Open accessAbstract
Respiration is poorly represented in whole plant or ecosystem models relative to photosynthesis. This paper reviews the principles underlying the development of a more mechanistic approach to modelling plant respiration and the criteria by which model behaviour might be judged. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Models should separate C substrate from structure so that direct or indirect C substrate dependence of the components of respiration can be represented. (2) Account should be taken of the fact that some of the energy for leaf respiration is drawn from the light reactions of photosynthesis. (3) It is possible to estimate respiration associated with growth, nitrate reduction, symbiotic N 2 fixation, N-uptake, other ion uptake and phloem loading, because reasonable estimates are available of average specific unit respiratory costs and the rates of these processes can be quantified. (4) At present, it is less easy to estimate respiration associated with protein turnover, maintenance of cell ion concentrations and gradients and all forms of respiration involving the alternative pathway and futile cycles. (5) The growth-maintenance paradigm is valuable but ‘maintenance ' is an approximate concept and there is no rigorous division between growth and maintenance energy-requiring processes. (6) An alternative ‘process-residual’ approach would be to estimate explicitly respiratory fluxes associated with the six processes listed in (3) above and treat the remainder as a residual with a phenomenological ‘ residual maintenance’ coefficient. (7) Maintenance or ‘residual maintenance’ respiration rates are often more closely related to tissue N content than biomass, volume or surface area. (8) Respiratory fluxes associated with different processes vary independently, seasonally and during plant development, and so should be represented separately if possible. (9) An unforced outcome of mechanistic models should be a constrained, but non-constant, ratio between whole plant gross photosynthesis and respiration. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants
(1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-473542-2.x5000-7 · Cited by 19,181
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
LAMBERS, H., & POORTER, H. (2004) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(03)34004-8 · Cited by 1,342
Lambers, H., & Poorter, H. (1992) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60148-8 · Cited by 1,226
Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis a quantitative approach
De Vries, F. W. T. P., Brunsting, A. H. M., & Van Laar, H. H. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90119-2 · Cited by 914
The Cost of Maintenance Processes in Plant Cells
DE VRIES, F. W. T. P. (1975) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084919 · Cited by 747
Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production?
Waring, R. H., Landsberg, J. J., & Williams, M. (1998) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/18.2.129 · Cited by 686
Prediction and measurement of photosynthetic productivity
Incoll, L. D. (1972) · Physiological Plant Pathology · doi:10.1016/0048-4059(72)90053-7 · Cited by 589
Plant and Crop Modelling: A Mathematical Approach to Plant and Crop Physiology
Thornley, J. H. M., & Johnson, I. R. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 565
Ryan, M. G., Hubbard, R. M., Pongracic, S., Raison, R. J., & McMurtrie, R. E. (1996) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/16.3.333 · Cited by 544
Cited by
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later.
Amthor, J. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1175 · Cited by 822
Scaling of respiration to nitrogen in leaves, stems and roots of higher land plants
Reich, P. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Pregitzer, K. S., Wright, I. J., Oleksyn, J., & Machado, J. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01185.x · Cited by 462
Carbohydrate metabolism and respiration in algae
Raven, J. A., & Beardall, J. (2003) · Advances in photosynthesis and respiration · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1038-2_10 · Cited by 90
BUCKLEY, T. N., & ADAMS, M. A. (2011) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02228.x · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- CANNELL, M.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-54
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120423689
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling the Components of Plant Respiration: Some Guiding Principles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbo.1999.0996
- The paper
- CANNELL, M. (2000). Modelling the Components of Plant Respiration: Some Guiding Principles. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.