Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 747

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Cost of Maintenance Processes in Plant Cells

Open access
DE VRIES, F. W. T. PENNING·1975·Annals of Botany

Abstract

The most important maintenance processes in plants are protein turnover and active transport processes to maintain certain ion concentrations in the cells. In this paper an attempt is made to calculate the total energy cost of these processes from what is known about their specific costs and what has been observed about their rates. Because of insufficient reliable data about rates of individual maintenance processes, only approximate values can be obtained. The average turnover rate of leaf proteins may be about 100 mg protein per g proteins per day at normal temperature in leaves assimilating at moderate light intensities. This process consumes 28–53 mg glucose per g protein per day, which equals 7–13 mg glucose per g dry weight per day in leaves. It is likely that the rates of protein turnover and of CO2-assimilation are related. The cost of maintaining ion concentrations is estimated to be about 6–10 mg glucose per g dry weight per day in leaves. The sum of these figures is lower than is indicated by measurements of maintenance respiration. One reason for the underestimation may be that the protein turnover rates used in the calculations apply to plants with lower photosynthetic rates than the plants in which the maintenance respiration was measured. Effects of water stress and salinity, temperature and other environmental factors on the rate of maintenance processes are discussed. The consumption of assimilates for maintenance of plant cells is a significant, negative factor in plant productivity. A better understanding of the maintenance processes may give a clue how to manipulate plant characteristics or the environment to reduce the amount of assimilates consumed in these processes. It is suggested that reduction in protein turnover rates may be one such manipulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084919

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 747

Metadata

Authors
DE VRIES, F. W. T. P.
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
1975-07
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
77-92
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2418740198
Cited by
747
References
17
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cost of Maintenance Processes in Plant Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084919
The paper
DE VRIES, F. W. T. P. (1975). The Cost of Maintenance Processes in Plant Cells. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084919

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.