The Quantum Gravitational Back-Reaction on Inflation
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is reason to believe that the energy levels may have an upper bound.
“That is all we really need, but there is also reason to believe that there may be an upper bound on the energy levels [5].”
From Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant (2002) · cites this paper as [5]
The remedy is to restrict attention to a single causal patch, following the black hole analogue.
“The remedy suggested by the black hole analogue is obvious; restrict all attention to a single causal patch [5,8,9].”
From Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant (2002) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Table of Integrals, Series, and Products
(1980) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10754-4 · Cited by 18,772 · see citing works
Table of Integrals, Series, and Products
S., D., Gradshteyn, I. S., & RYZHIK, I. M. (1966) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2003554 · Cited by 8,141 · see citing works
Hudson, R. G. (1917) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,912 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [12][12] S. Wolfram, Mathematica, 2nd edition (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1991). -
- [13][13] R. Mertig, Guide to FeynCalc 1.0 , University of W¨ urzburg preprint, March 1992. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant
Dyson, L., Kleban, M., & Susskind, L. (2002) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/10/011 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Induced quantum metric fluctuations and the validity of semiclassical gravity
Hu, B. L., Roura, A., & Verdaguer, E. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.044002 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Can backreaction prevent eternal inflation?
Brandenberger, R., Costa, R., & Franzmann, G. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.043517 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tsamis, N. C., & Woodard, R. P.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique (FR)
- University of Florida (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 253
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-54
- ISSN
- 0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003516864
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annals of Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- quantum gravity, inflation (cosmology), backreaction, two-loop corrections, Hubble parameter, gauge invariance, non-perturbative effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
