The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reduction of Neophobia in Humans by Exposure to Novel Foods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137
Self-citationHoek, A. C., Luning, P. A., Weijzen, P., Engels, W., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001 · Cited by 757
The importance of exposure for healthy eating in childhood: a review
Cooke, L. (2007) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-277x.2007.00804.x · Cited by 646
Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods
Tuorila, H., Lähteenmäki, L., Pohjalainen, L., & Lotti, L. (2001) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(00)00025-2 · Cited by 603
Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013 · Cited by 500
Metadata
- Authors
- Pliner, P., Pelchat, M., & Grabski, M.
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-123
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004250945
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduction of Neophobia in Humans by Exposure to Novel Foods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/appe.1993.1013
- The paper
- Pliner, P., Pelchat, M., & Grabski, M. (1993). Reduction of Neophobia in Humans by Exposure to Novel Foods. Appetite. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1993.1013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
