Cited by 603Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods

Tuorila, Hely, Lähteenmäki, Liisa, Pohjalainen, Leena, Lotti, Leila·2001·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

A representative sample of the Finns (n = 1083) rated the familiarity of 20 foods designated to be "familiar" or "unfamiliar" and willingness to try them. Subjects also filled in a 10-item questionnaire measuring their individual food neophobia. Food neophobia scores decreased with increasing education and with the degree of urbanization. Men were more neophobic than women, and the elderly (66-80 years) were more neophobic than the other age groups. Subjects with high food neophobia were less likely to have tasted or eaten the rated foods than were those with low food neophobia. Food neophobia significantly predicted the willingness to try "unfamiliar", and also some "familiar" foods. In factor analysis, the items of the food neophobia scale loaded on two factors but the variance was mainly explained by the first factor related to the interest in new foods. The second factor may reflect a general concern about trying unknown foods. Overall, the translated food neophobia scale appeared to be a valid instrument for the characterization of consumer responses to unfamiliar foods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0950-3293(00)00025-2

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuorila, H., Lähteenmäki, L., Pohjalainen, L., & Lotti, L.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Tuorila, Hely
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
29-37
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043067122
Cited by
603
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food neophobia, willingness to try new foods, food familiarity, Food Neophobia Scale, scale validation, educational attainment, urbanization, gender differences, age differences, Finnish consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review