A Satiety Quotient: A Formulation to Assess the Satiating Effect of Food
Abstract
This paper introduces a satiety quotient (SQ) to assess the satiating effect of an eating episode. This procedure constitutes an improvement on previous measures by considering the satiating effects of the eating episode over time. A satiety quotient was calculated from data obtained from several studies involving the presentation of a preload/meal to young lean male and female subjects. Subjects were presented with preloads/meals of varying composition, and motivation to eat immediately prior to, and periodically following, the eating episode were measured. Food and fluids were not consumed whilst motivation to eat was measured in the post preload/meal period. The SQ was calculated by dividing the difference between ratings of motivation to eat before and after the eating episode (pre minus post) by the weight or energy content of intake during the episode. This quotient relates intake to the rate of return of motivation to eat in the post-ingestive period, a relationship which is not apparent on separate examination of the amount consumed or ratings of motivation to eat. Development of this satiety quotient is a further contribution to the evolution of the concept of quantifying satiating effects of foods, and provides additional information on the effects of food attributes on short-term appetite control.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increase in post-prandial satiety (measured by the satiety quotient) is shown by all people who perform the exercise.
“Interestingly the increase in post-prandial satiety - measured by the satiety quotient or SQ which is an index of the satiating capacity of the energy consumed [60] - is shown by all people who perform the exercise.”
From Appetite control and energy balance: Impact of exercise (2015) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 160
- Authors
- GREEN, S., DELARGY, H., JOANES, D., & BLUNDELL, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-304
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074617826
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Keywords
- satiety, appetite regulation, preload, meal composition, dietary intake, energy content
- MeSH terms
- Energy Intake, Female, Humans, Hunger, Male, Satiety Response, Time Factors, Postprandial Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review