The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sympatric cryptic species in New Zealand Onychophora
Abstract
Allozyme electrophoresis was used to examine genetic diversity within live-bearing Peripatopsid Onychophora from the North Island of New Zealand. Specimens of two previously described morpho-species that differ in leg number (Peripatoides suteri and P. novaezealandiae) were found to be genetically diverse. P. suteri showed little intraspecific genetic variation but were very distinct from specimens assignable to P. novaezealandiae. Within P. novaezealandiae five genetically differentiated species were identified although none showed any consistent morphological differentiation, thus P. novaezealandiae (Hutton) is a species complex. All of these species occur in sympatry or parapatry (in one instance) with other cryptic species of the P. novaezealandiae group or with P. suteri. Four new species are described on the basis of this genetic evidence, they are P. morgani, P. aurorbis, P. kawekaensis and P. sympatrica. Other genotypes encountered indicate further cryptic species remain unrecognized. Among the North Island species, P. suteri and P. aurorbis sp. nov. are both more closely related to undescribed species from the South Island than to others examined from the North Island. P. sympatrica sp. nov. exists in sympatry with at least three other species in different parts of its range. The complexity of relationships and distributions probably arose through the interaction of low vagility in peripatus and the active geophysical history of the region. How these cryptic species persist in sympatry is not known but may be linked to differences in ecology not evident in their morphology, and/or may indicate recent dispersal from allopatry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THOMPSON, R., & TOWNSEND, C. (2006) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01068.x · Cited by 370
Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework
SHIRK, A. J., WALLIN, D. O., CUSHMAN, S. A., RICE, C. G., & WARHEIT, K. I. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04745.x · Cited by 235
Suicide clusters: A critical review
Gould, M. S., Wallenstein, S., & Davidson, L. (1989) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.1989.tb00363.x · Cited by 142
Genetic variation across the historical range of the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo)
Mock, K. E., Theimer, T. C., Rhodes, O. E., Greenberg, D. L., & Keim, P. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01467.x · Cited by 96
Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog?
LEE‐YAW, J. A., DAVIDSON, A., MCRAE, B. H., & GREEN, D. M. (2009) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04152.x · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- TREWICK, S.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-329
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109766949
- Cited by
- 1,105
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sympatric cryptic species in New Zealand Onychophora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/bijl.1997.0197
- The paper
- TREWICK, S. (1998). Sympatric cryptic species in New Zealand Onychophora. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1997.0197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.