The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies
Abstract
To test the veracity of previous studies and illuminate major community patterns from an intact community, a guild of nymphalid butterflies was sampled at monthly intervals for five consecutive years by trapping in the canopy and understorey of five contiguous forest plots in the same rainforest. Significant numbers of species belonged to either the canopy or understorey fauna, confirming fundamental vertical stratification, and showing that sampling in one vertical position is a poor estimator of diversity. Significant monthly variation showed that intermittent or short-term sampling would underestimate diversity, and significant variation among years and areas showed that diversity was strongly influenced by sampling year. Even when the underlying communities were the same, temporal interactions strongly affected species diversity in both horizontal and vertical dimensions. An unprecedented seasonal inversion of species richness and abundance was detected between the canopy and understorey that occurred at the onset of all rainy seasons. This investigation suggests that long-term studies evaluating spatial and temporal patterns of species diversity among many sites may be required for a better understanding of tropical communities and how best to conserve them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analyzing Tables of Statistical Tests
Rice, W. R. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409177 · Cited by 14,571
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
Biodiversity studies: Science and policy
Ehrlich, P. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5021.758 · Cited by 666
Cited by
Jost, L. (2006) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x · Cited by 4,669
Gering, J. C., Crist, T. O., & Veech, J. A. (2003) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01465.x · Cited by 391
Allocation of larval and adult resources to reproduction in a fruit-feeding butterfly
FISCHER, K., O'BRIEN, D. M., & BOGGS, C. L. (2004) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00892.x · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- DEVRIES, P.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136130652
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/bijl.2001.0571
- The paper
- DEVRIES, P. (2001). Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.2001.0571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.