The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EP Component Identification and Measurement by Principal Components-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Between the acquisition of Evoked Potential (EP) data and their interpretation lies a major problem: What to measure? An approach to this kind of problem is outlined here in terms of Principal Components Analysis (PCA). An important second theme is that experimental manipulation is important to functional interpretation. It would be desirable to have a system of EP measurement with the following characteristics: (1) represent the data in a concise, parsimonous way; (2) determine EP components from the data without assuming in advance any particular waveforms for the components; (3) extract components which are independent of each other; (4) measure the amounts (contributions) of various components in observed EPs; (5) use measures that have greater reliability than measures at any single time point or peak; and (6) identify and measure components that overlap in time. PCA has these desirable characteristics. Simulations are illustrated. PCA's beauty also has some warts that are discussed. In addition to discussing the usual two-mode model of PCA, an extension of PCA to a three-mode model is described that provides separate parameters for (1) waveforms over time, (2) coefficients for spatial distribution, and (3) scores telling the amount of each component in each EP. PCA is compared with more traditional approaches. Some biophysical considerations are briefly discussed. Choices to be made in applying PCA are considered. Other issues include misallocation of variance, overlapping components, validation, and latency changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pulvermüller, F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x9900182x · Cited by 1,284
Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: Neural correlates
Carretié, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Martín‐Loeches, M., Mercado, F., & Tapia, M. (2004) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20037 · Cited by 585
Wavelet Analysis of Neuroelectric Waveforms: A Conceptual Tutorial
Samar, V. J., Bopardikar, A., Rao, R., & Swartz, K. (1999) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.1998.2024 · Cited by 355
Cerebral patterns of attentional habituation to emotional visual stimuli.
Carretié, L., Hinojosa, J. A., & Mercado, F. (2003) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00041 · Cited by 103
Smoking during pregnancy affects speech-processing ability in newborn infants
Key, A. P. F., Ferguson, M., Molfese, D. L., Peach, K., Lehman, C., & Molfese, V. J. (2007) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.9521 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, R. M., & Mccrary, J. W.
- Venue
- Brain and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 288-310
- ISSN
- 0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977493819
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EP Component Identification and Measurement by Principal Components-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/brcg.1995.1024
- The paper
- Chapman, R. M., & Mccrary, J. W. (1995). EP Component Identification and Measurement by Principal Components-Analysis. Brain and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.