Cited by 78Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsInfant Development and Preterm CareHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Smoking during pregnancy affects speech-processing ability in newborn infants

Open access
Key, Alexandra P.F., Ferguson, Melissa, Molfese, Dennis L., Peach, Kelley, Lehman, Casey, Molfese, Victoria J.·2007·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking during pregnancy is known to adversely affect development of the central nervous system in babies of smoking mothers by restricting utero-placental blood flow and the amount of oxygen available to the fetus. Behavioral data associate maternal smoking with lower verbal scores and poorer performance on specific language/auditory tests. OBJECTIVES: In the current study we examined the effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on newborns' speech processing ability as measured by event-related potentials (ERPs). METHOD: High-density ERPs were recorded within 48 hr of birth in healthy newborn infants of smoking (n = 8) and nonsmoking (n = 8) mothers. Participating infants were matched on sex, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, mother's education, and family income. Smoking during pregnancy was determined by parental self-report and medical records. ERPs were recorded in response to six consonant-vowel syllables presented in random order with equal probability. RESULTS: Brainwaves of babies of nonsmoking mothers were characterized by typical hemisphere asymmetries, with larger amplitudes over the left hemisphere, especially over temporal regions. Further, infants of nonsmokers discriminated among a greater number of syllables whereas the newborns of smokers began the discrimination process at least 150 msec later and differentiated among fewer stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke in otherwise healthy babies is linked with significant changes in brain physiology associated with basic perceptual skills that could place the infant at risk for later developmental problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.9521

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Molfese DL Molfese VJ 1979b. Infant speech perception: Learned or innate. In: Advances in Neurolinguistics (Whitaker HW, Whitaker HA, ed). New York:Academic Press, 225–240.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Key, A. P. F., Ferguson, M., Molfese, D. L., Peach, K., Lehman, C., & Molfese, V. J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Key, Alexandra P.F.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2006-11-28
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
623-629
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2091710265
Cited by
78
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • U.S. Department of Education (R215K000023)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD017860, HD 17860)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
smoking during pregnancy, prenatal tobacco exposure, speech processing, neonates, event-related potentials, auditory discrimination, hemispheric lateralization, consonant-vowel syllables, infant brain development, language development
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Child Development, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Functional Laterality, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Smoking, Speech Perception, Matched-Pair Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review