Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,651

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know

Open access
Slavin, Robert E.·1996·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Abstract

Research on cooperative learning is one of the greatest success stories in the history of educational research.While there was some research on this topic from the early days of this century, the amount and quality of that research greatly accelerated in the early 1970s and continues unabated today, a quarter-century later.Hundreds of studies have compared cooperative learning to various control methods on a broad range of measures, but by far the most frequent objective of this research is to determine the effects of cooperative learning on student achievement.Studies of the achievement effects of cooperative learning have taken place in every major subject, at all grade levels, and in all types of schools in many countries.Both field studies and laboratory studies have produced a great deal of knowledge about the effects of many types of cooperative interventions and about the mechanisms responsible for these effects.Further, cooperative learning is not only a subject of research and theory, but it is also used at some level by millions of teachers.A recent national survey (Puma, Jones, Rock, & Fernandez, 1993) found that 79% of elementary teachers and 62% of middle school teachers reported making some sustained use of cooperative learning.Given the substantial body of research on cooperative learning and the many cooperative learning programs in widespread use, it might be assumed that there is little further research to be done.Yet this is not the case.There are many very important questions in research on this topic, and a great deal of development and evaluation remains to be done.In its fullest conception, cooperative learning provides a radically different approach to instruction, whose possibilities have been tapped only on a limited basis.While there is a growing consensus among researchers about the positive effects of cooperative learning on student achievement as well as a rapidly growing number of educators using cooperative learning at all levels of schooling This paper is adapted from Slavin (1992).It was written under a grant from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education (OERI-R-117-D40005).However, any opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily represent OERI positions or policies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,651

Metadata

Authors
Slavin, R. E.
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
43-69
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065182128
Cited by
1,651
References
3
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
The paper
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.