Cited by 517Speech Recognition and SynthesisNatural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech and dialogue systems

On structuring probabilistic dependences in stochastic language modelling

Ney, Hermann, Essen, Ute, Kneser, Reinhard·1994·Computer Speech & Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/csla.1994.1001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ney, H., Essen, U., & Kneser, R.
Venue
Computer Speech & Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-38
ISSN
0885-2308 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075201173
Cited by
517
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Speech & Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
conditional distributions, word prediction, bigram language model, trigram language model, linear interpolation, nonlinear interpolation, word clustering, cache memory, word association, self-association, German texts, English text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review