The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vivo Imaging Indicates Muscle Fiber Dedifferentiation Is a Major Contributor to the Regenerating Tail Blastema
Open accessAbstract
During tail regeneration in urodele amphibians such as axolotls, all of the tissue types, including muscle, dermis, spinal cord, and cartilage, are regenerated. It is not known how this diversity of cell types is reformed with such precision. In particular, the number and variety of mature cell types in the remaining stump that contribute to the blastema is unclear. Using Nomarski imaging, we followed the process of regeneration in the larval axolotl tail. Combining this with in vivo fluorescent labeling of single muscle fibers, we show that mature muscle dedifferentiates. Muscle dedifferentiation occurs by the synchronous fragmentation of the multinucleate muscle fiber into mononucleate cells followed by rapid cell proliferation and the extension of cell processes. We further show that direct clipping of the muscle fiber and severe tissue damage around the fiber are both required to initiate dedifferentiation. Our observations also make it possible to estimate for the first time how many of the blastema cells arise specifically from muscle dedifferentiation. Calculations based on our data suggest that up to 29% of nondermal-derived cells in the blastema come from dedifferentiation of mature muscle fibers. Overall, these results show that endogenous multinucleate muscle fibers can dedifferentiate into mononucleate cells and contribute significantly to the blastema.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellular and Molecular Regulation of Muscle Regeneration
CHARGÉ, S. B. P., & RUDNICKI, M. A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2003 · Cited by 2,680
Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration
Kragl, M., Knapp, D., Nacu, E., Khattak, S., Maden, M., Epperlein, H. H., & Tanaka, E. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08152 · Cited by 850
Self-citationDistinct Wnt signaling pathways have opposing roles in appendage regeneration
Stoick-Cooper, C. L., Weidinger, G., Riehle, K. J., Hubbert, C., Major, M. B., Fausto, N., & Moon, R. T. (2007) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.001123 · Cited by 532
Plasticity and reprogramming of differentiated cells in amphibian regeneration
Brockes, J. P., & Kumar, A. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm881 · Cited by 405
Macrophages modulate adult zebrafish tail fin regeneration
Petrie, T. A., Strand, N. S., Tsung-Yang, C., Rabinowitz, J. S., & Moon, R. T. (2014) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.098459 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Echeverri, K., Clarke, J. D. W., & Tanaka, E. M.
- Venue
- Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 236
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151-164
- ISSN
- 0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027909397
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Imaging Indicates Muscle Fiber Dedifferentiation Is a Major Contributor to the Regenerating Tail Blastema. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/dbio.2001.0312
- The paper
- Echeverri, K., Clarke, J. D. W., & Tanaka, E. M. (2001). In Vivo Imaging Indicates Muscle Fiber Dedifferentiation Is a Major Contributor to the Regenerating Tail Blastema. Developmental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.