The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Need for Definitions in Understanding Estuaries
Open accessAbstract
This paper considers what the definition/classification of estuaries has taught us and why there is a need for classification systems. It further considers why we need to define an estuary and its constituent parts, including the fundamental difficulty and dilemma of trying to define parts of a continuum, as a means to both understanding and managing that estuary. The review considers where an estuary starts and ends and the relative merits of defining estuaries in terms of their biology, physics, chemistry, geographic nature and socio-economic units. It briefly discusses the need for legal and planning definitions and the linkages between science and management. Following this, we present a generic framework for the definition, classification, monitoring, assessment, reporting and management of estuaries. In particular, it is argued that scientists should engage in the debate on the definition of estuaries for legal and socio-economic purposes. It is concluded here that as existing definitions will never be suitable for all needs, a different approach is required. The proposed ‘ Expert Judgement Checklist Approach ’ could provide guidance for those needing to define/delimit an estuary while still acknowledging the inherent variability of such systems. The proposed system mostly relates to the European, temperate estuary, but there are lessons here for estuaries worldwide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interpretation manual of European Union habitats.
Romão, C. (1996) · Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 663
What is an estuary: Physical Viewpoint
Pritchard, D. W. (1967) · American Association for the Advancement of Science eBooks · Cited by 648
Carbon Dioxide Emission from European Estuaries
Frankignoulle, M., Abril, G., Borges, A., Bourge, I., Canon, C., Delille, B., Libert, E., & Théate, J.-M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5388.434 · Cited by 568
HarperCollins (2007) · Cited by 550
A Dictionary of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics.
Lincoln, R. J., Boxshall, G. A., & Clark, P. F. (1983) · Systematic Botany · doi:10.2307/2418488 · Cited by 498
(2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470995228 · Cited by 367
Biology and ecology of fishes in Southern African estuaries /
Whitfield, A. K., & J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology. (1998) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.141872 · Cited by 309
Barnes, R. S. K., & Ketchum, B. H. (1983) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403142 · Cited by 285
Nature Conservation and Estuaries in Great Britain
Davidson, N. C., Doody, J. P., & Way, L. S. (1991) · Cited by 230
Biologically-Based Estuarine Salinity Zones Derived from a Multivariate Analysis
Bulger, A. J., Hayden, B. P., Monaco, M. E., Nelson, D. M., & McCormick-Ray, M. G. (1993) · Estuaries · doi:10.2307/1352504 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Columbia River Estuary ecosystem classification—Concept and application
Simenstad, C. A., Burke, J. L., O'Connor, J. E., Cannon, C., Heatwole, D. W., Ramirez, M. F., Waite, I. R., Counihan, T. D., & Jones, K. L. (2011) · Open-File Report · doi:10.3133/ofr20111228 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Elliott, M., & McLusky, D. S.
- Venue
- Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 815-827
- ISSN
- 0272-7714 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071744342
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 34.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Need for Definitions in Understanding Estuaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/ecss.2002.1031
- The paper
- Elliott, M., & McLusky, D. S. (2002). The Need for Definitions in Understanding Estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2002.1031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.