Cited by 43Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsGeological formations and processes

Columbia River Estuary ecosystem classification—Concept and application

Simenstad, Charles A., Burke, Jennifer L., O'Connor, Jim E., Cannon, Charles, Heatwole, Danelle W., Ramirez, Mary F., Waite, Ian R., Counihan, Timothy D. +1 more·2011·Open-File Report

Abstract

This document describes the concept, organization, and application of a hierarchical ecosystem classification that integrates saline and tidal freshwater reaches of estuaries in order to characterize the ecosystems of large flood plain rivers that are strongly influenced by riverine and estuarine hydrology. We illustrate the classification by applying it to the Columbia River estuary (Oregon-Washington, USA), a system that extends about 233 river kilometers (rkm) inland from the Pacific Ocean. More than three-quarters of this length is tidal freshwater. The Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification ("Classification") is based on six hierarchical levels, progressing from the coarsest, regional scale to the finest, localized scale: (1) Ecosystem Province; (2) Ecoregion; (3) Hydrogeomorphic Reach; (4) Ecosystem Complex; (5) Geomorphic Catena; and (6) Primary Cover Class. We define and map Levels 1-3 for the entire Columbia River estuary with existing geospatial datasets, and provide examples of Levels 4-6 for one hydrogeomorphic reach. In particular, three levels of the Classification capture the scales and categories of ecosystem structure and processes that are most tractable to estuarine research, monitoring, and management. These three levels are the (1) eight hydrogeomorphic reaches that embody the formative geologic and tectonic processes that created the existing estuarine landscape and encompass the influence of the resulting physiography on interactions between fl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3133/ofr20111228

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simenstad, C. A., Burke, J. L., O'Connor, J. E., Cannon, C., Heatwole, D. W., Ramirez, M. F., Waite, I. R., Counihan, T. D., & Jones, K. L.
Venue
Open-File Report
Published
2011
Pages
i-54
ISSN
  • 0196-1497 (ISSN-L)
  • 2331-1258
OpenAlex
W1537942103
Cited by
42
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
Keywords
Columbia River estuary, hierarchical classification, tidal freshwater, ecoregions, floodplain rivers, estuarine landscape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review