Spatial mapping of polarized light transmission in the central rabbit cornea
Open accessAbstract
In this paper polarized light transmission measurements are made under conditions that closely approximate the physiological state in order to probe lamellar structure in the central cornea of New Zealand white rabbits. The results are interpreted with the aid of a newly developed theory (published elsewhere) in which the cornea is modeled as stacked birefringent layers corresponding to the lamellae. The theory enables predictions of the statistical properties of lamellar ordering based on characteristics of the transmission of polarized light. The experimental results are consistent with a structure in which a number of lamellae have a fixed azimuthal orientation (i.e. about an axis normal to the corneal surface), whereas the remainder are essentially randomly oriented. Comparisons with the theoretical predictions are consistent with a model in which the preferred direction in the apical region of the cornea does not vary significantly among rabbits; and the preferred lamellar orientation direction determined for the population measured here is very close to that suggested in previous experiments on a smaller number of rabbits. Mapping experiments using a new goniometric holder showed that the preferential order at the apical region is closely preserved throughout the central approximately 4 mm diameter optical zone in individual corneas.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The two most commonly used techniques to measure corneal transparency ex vivo are tungsten light-based or laser-based bench-top optical systems, or spectrophotometry.
“The two most commonly used techniques to measure corneal transparency ex vivo are tungsten light-based or laser-based bench-top optical systems (Farrell et al., 1973, Christens-Barry et al., 1996, Parekh et al., 2014), or spectrophotometry (Cejka et al., 2010, Doutch et al., 2008).”
From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Christens-Barry et al., 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneal structure and transparency
Meek, K. M., & Knupp, C. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
- Authors
- CHRISTENS-BARRY, W. A., GREEN, W. J., CONNOLLY, P. J., FARRELL, R. A., & MCCALLY, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Experimental Eye Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 651-662
- ISSN
- 0014-4835 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095118853
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Experimental Eye Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Navy
- National Eye Institute (R01EY001019, EY01019)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Keywords
- corneal lamellae, polarized light transmission, corneal birefringence, lamellar orientation, corneal structure, rabbit cornea
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birefringence, Cornea, Photometry, Rabbits, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review