Cited by 18Corneal surgery and disordersOptical Polarization and EllipsometryOcular Surface and Contact Lens

Spatial mapping of polarized light transmission in the central rabbit cornea

Open access
CHRISTENS-BARRY, WILLIAM A., GREEN, WILLIAM J., CONNOLLY, PATRICK J., FARRELL, RICHARD A., MCCALLY, RUSSELL L.·1996·Experimental Eye Research

Abstract

In this paper polarized light transmission measurements are made under conditions that closely approximate the physiological state in order to probe lamellar structure in the central cornea of New Zealand white rabbits. The results are interpreted with the aid of a newly developed theory (published elsewhere) in which the cornea is modeled as stacked birefringent layers corresponding to the lamellae. The theory enables predictions of the statistical properties of lamellar ordering based on characteristics of the transmission of polarized light. The experimental results are consistent with a structure in which a number of lamellae have a fixed azimuthal orientation (i.e. about an axis normal to the corneal surface), whereas the remainder are essentially randomly oriented. Comparisons with the theoretical predictions are consistent with a model in which the preferred direction in the apical region of the cornea does not vary significantly among rabbits; and the preferred lamellar orientation direction determined for the population measured here is very close to that suggested in previous experiments on a smaller number of rabbits. Mapping experiments using a new goniometric holder showed that the preferential order at the apical region is closely preserved throughout the central approximately 4 mm diameter optical zone in individual corneas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/exer.1996.0076

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two most commonly used techniques to measure corneal transparency ex vivo are tungsten light-based or laser-based bench-top optical systems, or spectrophotometry.

    “The two most commonly used techniques to measure corneal transparency ex vivo are tungsten light-based or laser-based bench-top optical systems (Farrell et al., 1973, Christens-Barry et al., 1996, Parekh et al., 2014), or spectrophotometry (Cejka et al., 2010, Doutch et al., 2008).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Christens-Barry et al., 1996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHRISTENS-BARRY, W. A., GREEN, W. J., CONNOLLY, P. J., FARRELL, R. A., & MCCALLY, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Experimental Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
651-662
ISSN
0014-4835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095118853
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Eye Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Navy
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY001019, EY01019)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Keywords
corneal lamellae, polarized light transmission, corneal birefringence, lamellar orientation, corneal structure, rabbit cornea
MeSH terms
Animals, Birefringence, Cornea, Photometry, Rabbits, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review