Cited by 75Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchS100 Proteins and AnnexinsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Developmental Changes of S-100 Protein and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in the Brain in Down Syndrome

Mito, Takashi, Becker, Laurence E.·1993·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

The location of the gene for the beta subunit of S-100 protein on chromosome 21 suggests that expression may be increased in trisomy 21. Astrocytes from Down syndrome and control patients were examined by immunohistochemistry for the expression of S-100 protein. Adjacent sections were reacted with antisera to glial fibrillary acidic protein to ascertain the presence or absence of astrogliosis. The developmental change in expression of S-100 protein was determined in patients ranging in age from 34 gestational weeks to 57 years. In control patients the number of S-100 protein-immunoreactive cells increased during early infancy to reach a plateau; the number stayed at this level until adulthood and then gradually declined. In Down syndrome, the pattern was similar, except that the number of S-100 protein-positive cells in the hippocampus was greater than in controls, especially during early infancy and at older ages. In the patients examined in early infancy there was no evidence of astrogliosis. However, in older patients with Down syndrome the increased number of immunoreactive cells with antisera to both S-100 protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein indicates the presence of gliosis related to occurrence of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The increased immunoreactivity of S-100 protein in early life suggests that in trisomy 21 the expression of the gene for the beta subunit may be enhanced. The significance of increased S-100 protein in relation to neural mat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/exnr.1993.1052

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural progenitor cells derived from the fetal brain of individuals with Down syndrome generate more astrocytes in culture than control fetal neural progenitor cells.

    “That there is increased gliogenesis in DS is supported by reports that NPCs derived from the fetal brain of individuals with DS generate more astrocytes in culture than in control fetal NPCs99,101,102.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mito, T., & Becker, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-04
Volume
120
Issue
2
Pages
170-176
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001748283
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › S100 Proteins and Annexins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Down syndrome, S-100 protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein, astrocytes, astrocyte activation, hippocampus, developmental changes, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, neuronal maturation, chromosome 21
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Brain, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Frontal Lobe, Gestational Age, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Hippocampus, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, S100 Proteins, Organ Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review