Cited by 138Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsComplement system in diseases

Complement Component C1q Modulates the Phagocytosis of Aβ by Microglia

Webster, Scott D., Yang, Austin J., Margol, Larry, Garzon-Rodriguez, William, Glabe, Charles G., Tenner, Andrea J.·2000·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Recent studies showing that microglia internalize the amyloid beta-peptide (Abeta) suggest that these cells have the potential for clearing Abeta deposits in Alzheimer's disease, and mechanisms that regulate the removal of Abeta may therefore be of clinical interest. Previous studies from this laboratory showing that C1q enhances phagocytosis of cellular targets by rat microglia prompted the current investigations characterizing the effects of C1q on microglial phagocytosis of Abeta. Microglia were shown to phagocytose Abeta1-42, in agreement with observations of other investigators. Uptake of Abeta1-42 was observed for concentrations of 5-50 microM, and phagocytosis of peptides containing (14)C or fluorescein (FM) labels was not affected by the interaction of microglia with C1q-coated surfaces. However, inclusion of C1q (125 nM-1.4 microM) in solutions of 50 microM Abeta1-42 inhibited the uptake of (14)C-Abeta1-42 and FM-Abeta1-42, suggesting that C1q blocks the interaction of Abeta with microglia. Uptake of Abeta was partially blocked by the scavenger receptor ligands polyinosinic acid and maleylated BSA. Inhibition of Abeta uptake by C1q may contribute to the accumulation of fibrillar, C1q-containing plaques that occurs in parallel with disease progression. These data suggest that mechanisms which interfere with the binding of C1q to Abeta may be of therapeutic value both through inhibition of the inflammatory events resulting from complement activation and via altered acc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/exnr.1999.7260

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 138

Authors
Webster, S. D., Yang, A. J., Margol, L., Garzon-Rodriguez, W., Glabe, C. G., & Tenner, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
161
Issue
1
Pages
127-138
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115296748
Cited by
138
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG00096)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS035144, NS35144)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
Keywords
C1q, amyloid-beta, microglia, phagocytosis, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta 42, scavenger receptors, polyinosinic acid, complement activation, plaque formation, amyloid clearance
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Biological Transport, Carbon Radioisotopes, Cells, Cultured, Cerebral Cortex, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Kinetics, Membrane Proteins, Peptide Fragments, Phagocytosis, Receptors, Immunologic, Solubility, Complement C1q, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Microglia, Receptors, Lipoprotein, Receptors, Scavenger, Scavenger Receptors, Class B, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review