The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Strotz, R. H. (1955) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295722 · Cited by 2,834 · cited 1×
“. For standard dynamic inconsistencies, Strotz 1956 provides a framework of analysis in which every information set is assumed to be a point of decision and the decision maker is unable to control his behavior at future information sets.”
Background
Cited by
SELECTIVE ATTENTION AND LEARNING
Schwartzstein, J. (2014) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12104 · Cited by 269
Sleeping Beauty: A Simple Solution
Weintraub, R. (2004) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/64.1.8 · Cited by 58
Ten Reasons to Care about the Sleeping Beauty Problem
Titelbaum, M. G. (2013) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12080 · Cited by 27
AI Research Considerations for Human Existential Safety (ARCHES)
Critch, A., & Krueger, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04948 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Piccione, M., & Rubinstein, A.
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-24
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968703966
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/game.1997.0536
- The paper
- Piccione, M., & Rubinstein, A. (1997). On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall. Games and Economic Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1997.0536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
