Cited by 27Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgePhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Ten Reasons to Care about the Sleeping Beauty Problem

Titelbaum, Michael G.·2013·Philosophy Compass

Abstract

Abstract The Sleeping Beauty Problem attracts so much attention because it connects to a wide variety of unresolved issues in formal epistemology, decision theory, and the philosophy of science. The problem raises unanswered questions concerning relative frequencies, objective chances, the relation between self‐locating and non‐self‐locating information, the relation between self‐location and updating, Dutch Books, accuracy arguments, memory loss, indifference principles, the existence of multiple universes, and many‐worlds interpretations of quantum mechanics. After stating the problem, this article surveys its connections to all of these areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/phc3.12080

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Titelbaum, M. G.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Titelbaum, Michael G.
Venue
Philosophy Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
1003-1017
ISSN
1747-9991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1815813971
Cited by
27
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophy Compass (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
Sleeping Beauty problem, relative frequency, objective chance, Dutch book argument, memory loss, many-worlds interpretation, quantum mechanics, updating, decision theory, formal epistemology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review