Cited by 202Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Psychological State and Mood Effects of Steroidal Chemosignals in Women and Men

Jacob, Suma, McClintock, Martha K.·2000·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that isolated steroids, claimed to act like pheromones, affect human psychological state or mood. In the first experiment, we established that two steroids, Delta4, 16-androstadien-3-one and 1,3,5(10)16-estratetraen-3-ol, modulated emotional states within 6 min of exposure. In men and women, neither steroid had specific effects on states of alertness or negative-confused mood. However, both steroids increased positive stimulated mood state in women but decreased it in men. These psychological findings do not parallel the reported sexually specific effects of these two steroids on the surface potential activity of putative vomeronasal epithelium. In a second experiment on women, we replicated that Delta4,16-androstadien-3-one modulated their general mood state, even when women were not aware of its odor and gave identical olfactory descriptions for the steroid and the control carrier solutions. In this within-subjects, repeated-measures experiment, androstadienone prevented the deterioration in general mood which occurred during exposure to the clove oil carrier solution in the laboratory environment. Thus, androstadienone appears to modulate affect, rather than releasing stereotyped behaviors or emotions. It is premature to call these steroids human pheromones. They are nonetheless psychologically potent, mandating future work delineating their function-i.e., whether these steroids are communicative chemosignals, context specific, or related to uncons…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/hbeh.1999.1559

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jacob and McClintock reported a human behavioral response to odor: changes in mood elicited by androstadienone and 1,3,5(10)16 estratetraen-3-ol.

    “Jacob and McClintock have also recently reported a human behavioral response to odor; changes in mood elicited by androstadienone and 1,3,5(10)16 estratetraen-3-ol (Jacob and McClintock, 2000).”

    From Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases (2001) · cites this paper as Jacob and McClintock, 2000

  • Androstadienone and 1,3,5(10)16 estratetraen-3-ol elicit sexually dimorphic EVGs and are related to skin chemicals claimed to be human pheromones.

    “These are substances that elicit sexually dimorphic EVGs and are related to skin chemicals claimed to be human pheromones.”

    From Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases (2001) · cites this paper as Jacob and McClintock, 2000

  • Jacob and McClintock report the maintenance of a more positive mood in women in the presence of androstadienone under circumstances where control subjects showed an increasingly negative mood.

    “Jacob and McClintock report the maintenance of a more positive mood in women in the presence of androstadienone under circumstances where control subjects showed an increasingly negative mood.”

    From Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases (2001) · cites this paper as Jacob and McClintock, 2000

  • A change of mood on exposure to a human-derived chemical does not adequately define a pheromone.

    “On the other hand, a change of mood on exposure to a human-derived chemical (Grosser et al., 2000;Jacob and McClintock, 2000) does not adequately define a pheromone.”

    From Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases (2001) · cites this paper as Jacob and McClintock, 2000

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 65 · Cited by 202

Authors
Jacob, S., & McClintock, M. K.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
McClintock, Martha K.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
57-78
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088095086
Cited by
202
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH041788)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
chemosignals, pheromones, androstadienone, mood, emotional state, sex differences, vomeronasal epithelium, olfactory perception, clove oil, chemosensory communication, modulators
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Androstadienes, Arousal, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Estrenes, Eugenol, Female, Humans, Male, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Smell, Steroids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review