Cited by 280Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesIon Channels and ReceptorsAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies

Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases

Meredith, M.·2001·Chemical Senses

Abstract

Chemical communication does appear to occur among humans, but several examples reported in the literature do not meet the proposed definition for communication by pheromones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chemse/26.4.433

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

6 of 103 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The increase in serum luteinizing hormone and testosterone when male mice and hamsters are exposed to chemosensory stimuli from females appears to be absolutely dependent on vomeronasal integrity.

    “The increase in serum luteinizing hormone and testosterone when male mice and hamsters are exposed to chemosensory stimuli from females appears to be absolutely dependent on vomeronasal integrity (Coquelin et al., 1984;Pfeiffer and Johnston, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Coquelin et al., 1984 source

      The Results (page not provided) show that removing the vomeronasal organ greatly reduced LH responses to female urine in male mice. But some mice without the organ still responded to urine, and most responded to a freely behaving female, so the paper does not establish absolute dependence for all female stimuli. It reports a testosterone finding from another mouse study but does not study testosterone or hamsters itself. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Pfeiffer and Johnston, 1994 source

      The Discussion reports that vomeronasal removal eliminated androgen surges in hamsters investigating female vaginal secretions, and describes comparable LH findings for mice exposed to female urine. But it also says vomeronasal lesions did not eliminate hamster androgen surges during interactions with females; the claimed absolute dependence is therefore broader than the paper supports. The mouse testosterone surge is described as presumed rather than directly established by the cited mouse finding. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The human VNO structure becomes more simplified later in development.

    “These authors showed the structure becoming more simplified later in development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    The existence of a VNO in the human embryo similar to the VNOs of other species is undisputed.

    “The existence of a VNO in the human embryo similar to the VNOs of other species is undisputed (Boehm and Gasser, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boehm and Gasser, 1993 source
  • Interpretationnone given

    Several examples reported in the literature do not meet the proposed definition for communication by pheromones.

    “However, several examples reported in the literature do not meet the proposed definition for communication by pheromones: 'chemical substances released by one member of a species as communication with another member, to their mutual benefit'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Induction of uterine growth and estrus in female prairie voles normally resulting from exposure to males is dependent on an intact VNO.

    “Induction of uterine growth and estrus in female prairie voles normally resulting from exposure to males is also dependent on an intact VNO (Tubbiola and Wysocki, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tubbiola and Wysocki, 1997 source
  • May combine two claims. 69
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 63
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The epithelium lining the human VNO is unlike that of VNOs in other species and unlike that of olfactory or respiratory epithelium in humans.

    “The epithelium lining the human VNO is unlike that of VNOs in other species and unlike that of olfactory or respiratory epithelium in humans (Moran et al., 1991;Stensaas et al., 1991).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moran et al., 1991 source

      The paper’s conclusion describes the human VNO lining as unlike other epithelial linings described in the human body, supporting the comparison with human olfactory and respiratory epithelium. In “The fine structure of the VNO in man,” however, it says some human VNO cells resemble cells in the rat VNO’s nonsensory epithelium. The broader claim that the lining is unlike VNO epithelium in other species is therefore not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Stensaas et al., 1991 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The human vomeronasal epithelium differs in appearance from both the sensory and non-sensory epithelia in the VNOs of other species and from nasal 'respiratory' epithelium.

    “The human vomeronasal epithelium differs in appearance from both the sensory and non-sensory epithelia in the VNOs of other species and from nasal 'respiratory' epithelium (Moran et al., 1991;Stensaas et al., 1991).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moran et al., 1991 source

      In “Does the human VNO contain sensory receptors?” (page unavailable), the paper says human VNO cells are not ultrastructurally identical to sensory neurons described in other mammals. “The fine structure of the human VNO” distinguishes a ciliated cell from those in typical respiratory epithelium. But “The fine structure of the VNO in man” says human VNO cells resemble cells in the nonsensory VNO epithelium of mammals such as rats, so the claimed difference from nonsensory epithelium is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Stensaas et al., 1991 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The recognition of newborn lambs by ewes also appears to depend on the main olfactory system, although a vomeronasal contribution has also been reported.

    “The recognition of newborn lambs by ewes also appears to depend on the main olfactory system (Levy et al., 1995), although a vomeronasal contribution has also been reported (Booth and Katz, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Levy et al., 1995 source
    • cites Booth and Katz, 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Reproductive suppression in subordinate females, as may occur in some primate species, may also involve a conservation of metabolic effort until more favorable circumstances arise.

    “Reproductive suppression in subordinate females, as may occur in some primate species (Barrett et al., 1993), may also involve a conservation of metabolic effort until more favorable circumstances arise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barrett et al., 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The human embryonic VNO contains bipolar cells similar to the developing vomeronasal sensory neurons of other species and also generates LHRH-producing cells as in other species.

    “It contains bipolar cells similar to the developing vomeronasal sensory neurons of other species and also generates luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH)producing cells as in other species (Boehm et al., 1994;Kajer and Fischer Hansen, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Boehm et al., 1994 source
    • cites Kajer and Fischer Hansen, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some authors were unable to find any VNO structure at later stages (19 weeks), although others have shown a simplified but clear VNO continuing to increase in size up to at least 30 weeks.

    “The latter were unable to find any VNO structure at later stages (19 weeks), although others have shown a simplified but clear VNO continuing to increase in size up to at least 30 weeks (Bohm and Gasser, 1993;Smith et al., 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bohm and Gasser, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Smith et al., 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The responsive neurons were in the apical zone of the vomeronasal epithelium where most neurons appear to express members of the V1R class of putative vomeronasal receptor genes.

    “The responsive neurons were in the apical zone of the vomeronasal epithelium where most neurons appear to express members of the V1R class of putative vomeronasal receptor genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Axon bundles are reported in the submucosa, but do not appear to arise from axon bundles penetrating the lamina propria in the same way as in vomeronasal epithelia of other species.

    “Axon bundles are reported in the submucosa (Stensaas et al., 1991), but do not appear to arise from axon bundles penetrating the lamina propria in the same way as in vomeronasal epithelia of other species.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stensaas et al., 1991 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These elongated cells have not been shown to have axons leaving the epithelium nor to make synaptic contact with axons in the epithelium, so if they are chemosensitive they have no obvious way of communication with the brain.

    “They have not been shown to have axons leaving the epithelium nor to make synaptic contact with axons in the epithelium, so if they are chemosensitive they have no obvious way of communication with the brain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Many elongated cells in the human VNO present a microvillar surface to the lumen but most are not similar to microvillar vomeronasal sensory organs (VSNs) of other species.

    “There are many elongated cells presenting a microvillar surface to the lumen of the organ but most are not similar to microvillar vomeronasal sensory organs (VSNs) of other species.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Its relationship to animal vomeronasal genes is not good evidence for such a function and throws no light on the question of human vomeronasal function.

    “However, its relationship to animal vomeronasal genes is not good evidence for such a function and throws no light on the question of human vomeronasal function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The adult human VNO structure is reported at least unilaterally in 90% or more of subjects in some reports or in 50% or fewer in other reports.

    “The structure is reported at least unilaterally in 90% or more of subjects in some reports or in 50% or fewer in other reports.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The location of the adult human VNO structure is consistent with the location of the VNO in embryos and it has a similar simplified form, with no large blood vessels, cavernous sinuses or supporting cartilage.

    “The location of this structure is consistent with the location of the VNO in embryos (Trotier et al., 2000) and it has a similar simplified form, with no large blood vessels, cavernous sinuses or supporting cartilage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trotier et al., 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    There is evidence in these reports for a systemic physiological response to this stimulation and for an alteration of mood.

    “There is also evidence in these reports for a systemic physiological response to this stimulation and although anecdotal evidence suggests no conscious response in awake human subjects, there is evidence for an alteration of mood.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is no evidence that the nervus terminalis is chemosensory or that the human terminalis nerve carries the axons of VSNs, but it may innervate the vomeronasal epithelium.

    “There is no evidence that this nerve is chemosensory or that the human terminalis nerve carries the axons of VSNs (although the two do run together in most mammals), but it may innervate the vomeronasal epithelium (Witkin and Silverman, 1983;Wirsig and Leonard, 1986).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Witkin and Silverman, 1983 source
    • cites Wirsig and Leonard, 1986 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Trotier et al. estimate ~92% with some evidence of at least one VNO pit in subjects with no septal surgery examined multiple times, but a substantially lower number after septal surgery.

    “Trotier et al. estimate ~92% with some evidence of at least one VNO pit in subjects with no septal surgery examined multiple times, but a substantially lower number after septal surgery (Trotier et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trotier et al., 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The best candidates for VSNs, those expressing NSE, have not been traced in connectivity with axons and neither have any other cells of the human VNO.

    “The best candidates for VSNs, those expressing NSE, have not been traced in connectivity with axons and neither have any other cells of the human VNO.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Expression of these genes in the vomeronasal epithelium is no guarantee of pheromone receptor function because some pheromones are clearly detected by the main olfactory system and possible non-pheromone functions of the vomeronasal system have not been investigated.

    “Their expression in the vomeronasal epithelium is no guarantee: some pheromones are clearly detected by the main olfactory system (see below) and possible non-pheromone functions of the vomeronasal system (as in snakes) have not been investigated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is no trace of the AOB in adult humans, although it is present in the fetus, and it is generally reported missing in rhesus monkeys and other old world primates.

    “There is no trace of this structure in adult humans (Humphrey 1940;Meisami and Bhatnagar, 1998), although it is present in the fetus (Chuah and Zeng, 1987), and it is generally reported missing in rhesus monkeys and other old world primates (Wysocki, 1979;Stephan et al., 1982).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Humphrey 1940 source
    • cites Meisami and Bhatnagar, 1998 source
    • cites Chuah and Zeng, 1987

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These genes are expressed in VSNs and are similar in apparent transmembrane organization to olfactory receptor genes, but differ in much of their DNA sequence.

    “These genes are expressed in VSNs and are similar in apparent transmembrane organization to olfactory receptor genes (Buck and Axel, 1991), but differ in much of their DNA sequence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Buck and Axel, 1991 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Axons are observed in the epithelium, but not in continuity or in synaptic contact with epithelial cells.

    “Axons are observed in the epithelium (Stensaas et al., 1991), but not in continuity or in synaptic contact with epithelial cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stensaas et al., 1991 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There are axons within the human VNO and Schwann cell-wrapped bundles of axons underlying it, so it is somewhat surprising that Trotier et al. did not find S100 expression close to the VNO.

    “There are axons within the human VNO and Schwann cell-wrapped bundles of axons underlying it (Stensaas et al., 1991;Jahnke and Merker, 2000), so it is somewhat surprising that Trotier et al. did not find S100 expression close to the VNO (Trotier et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Stensaas et al., 1991 source
    • cites Jahnke and Merker, 2000 source
    • cites Trotier et al., 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    There is no serious error in methodology that is obvious from the published papers, so they have to be taken seriously.

    “There is no serious error in methodology that is obvious from the published papers, so they have to be taken seriously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    These genes were labeled 'putative pheromone receptor genes', although at the time of their discovery the evidence that they might code for pheromone receptor molecules was tenuous.

    “These genes were labeled 'putative pheromone receptor genes', although at the time of their discovery the evidence that they might code for pheromone receptor molecules was tenuous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The nervus terminalis characteristically connects the VNO and the brain in the fetus and clearly persists in human adults.

    “The nervus terminalis (Brookover, 1914;Pearson, 1941) characteristically connects the VNO and the brain in the fetus and clearly persists in human adults (Brookover, 1914).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brookover, 1914 source
    • cites Pearson, 1941 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Genes similar to the vomeronasal receptor genes are also present in the human genome; those found in initial searches are clearly pseudogenes.

    “Genes similar to the vomeronasal receptor genes are also present in the human genome.Those found in initial searches through the genome are clearly pseudogenes (Dulac and Axel, 1995;Herrada and Dulac, 1997), i.e. they have defects in their sequence that would prevent transcription and translation of the expected transmembrane protein.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dulac and Axel, 1995 source
    • cites Herrada and Dulac, 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The endoscopic appearance of the VNO pit can vary, unequivocal on one inspection and invisible on a later inspection, or vice versa.

    “Trotier et al. recently demonstrated that the endoscopic appearance of the VNO pit can vary, unequivocal on one inspection and invisible on a later inspection, or vice versa (Trotier et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trotier et al., 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rodriguez et al. reported the discovery of a previously undetected human gene closely related to the V1R family in rodents, and it is expressed in the main olfactory epithelium.

    “In a recent paper Rodriguez et al. reported the discovery of a previously undetected human gene closely related to the V1R family in rodents (Rodriguez et al., 2000).Whether it is expressed in human vomeronasal epithelium was not reported, but it is expressed in the main olfactory epithelium.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rodriguez et al., 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Not all human sequences related to vomeronasal receptor genes have been investigated in detail, so this negative evidence should be viewed with some caution.

    “Not all human sequences related to vomeronasal receptor genes have been investigated in detail, so this negative evidence should be viewed with some caution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Stoddart's argument that there might be evolutionary pressure for loss of human vomeronasal function is logically circular in the context of an evaluation of VNO function because it starts with the premise that there is no human VNO.

    “Whatever its anthropological merit, this argument is logically circular in the context of an evaluation of VNO function because it starts with the premise that there is no human VNO.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stoddart, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The hormonal changes elicited by steroid chemicals in these studies are not evidence for a physiological connection between the VNO region and the brain and provide no evidence for VNO function.

    “The hormonal changes elicited by steroid chemicals in these studies are not evidence for a physiological connection between the VNO region and the brain and provide no evidence for VNO function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is no requirement that vomeronasal chemoreceptors be stimulated only by non-volatile chemicals.

    “However, there is no requirement that vomeronasal chemoreceptors be stimulated only by non-volatile chemicals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The steroids elicited clear EVG responses; the conventional odors did not.

    “The steroids elicited clear EVG responses; the conventional odors did not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Repeated stimulus delivery over a prolonged period would make low level stimulation of other nasal sensory systems or systemic uptake of stimulus chemicals more likely.

    “Furthermore, repeated stimulus delivery over a prolonged period would make low level stimulation of other nasal sensory systems or systemic uptake of stimulus chemicals more likely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The precise location of the recording electrode in EVG recording experiments is not well described, but its effective recording volume is likely to be biased towards the regions close to the opening (VNO pit).

    “The precise location of the recording electrode in EVG recording experiments is not well described, but its effective recording volume is likely to be biased towards the regions close to the opening (VNO pit).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Sensory input of any kind in humans, unless signaling imminent danger, is often subordinate to experiential and cultural factors.

    “Sensory input of any kind in humans, unless signaling imminent danger, is often subordinate to experiential and cultural factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Any local VNO response must be communicated to the brain before a sensory communication pathway is established.

    “However, as discussed above, any local VNO response must be communicated to the brain before a sensory communication pathway is established.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The trend towards menstrual synchronization arises from either shortening or lengthening of the cycle by secretions produced at different phases of the donor's cycle.

    “The trend towards synchronization arises from either shortening or lengthening of the cycle by secretions produced at different phases of the donor's cycle [but see the comment by Whitten (Whitten, 1999)].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stern and McClintock, 1998 source
    • cites Whitten, 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It would seem surprising if all olfactory/chemosensory communication were lost in humans.

    “It would seem surprising if all olfactory/chemosensory communication were lost.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There are close connections between the vomeronasal system and the amygdala and limbic system, the seat of emotional, hormonal and autonomic control, but only indirect connections with the cerebral cortex.

    “There are close connections with the amygdala and limbic system (Halpern, 1987;Meredith, 1991), the seat of emotional, hormonal and autonomic control, but there are only indirect connections with the cerebral cortex, generally considered to be the site of consciousness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Halpern, 1987

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Meredith, 1991 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Androstadienone and 1,3,5(10)16 estratetraen-3-ol elicit sexually dimorphic EVGs and are related to skin chemicals claimed to be human pheromones.

    “These are substances that elicit sexually dimorphic EVGs and are related to skin chemicals claimed to be human pheromones.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jacob and McClintock, 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Intra-specific chemical communication, some of which is vomeronasal and some olfactory, is a common feature in land mammals.

    “Intra-specific chemical communication, some of which is vomeronasal and some olfactory, is a common feature in land mammals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Higher primates have highly developed visual systems and reduced olfactory systems, but still use olfactory information.

    “Higher primates have highly developed visual systems and reduced olfactory systems, but still use olfactory information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Preti and Wysocki concluded that chemical communication does occur and are willing to call the chemical mediators pheromones in some cases.

    “They conclude that chemical communication does occur and are willing to call the chemical mediators pheromones in some cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Preti and Wysocki, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Stoddart's argument also assumes that detection of 'pheromones' signaling reproductive state would be a vomeronasal function.

    “It also assumes that detection of 'pheromones' signaling reproductive state would be a vomeronasal function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stoddart, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The EVG is reported not to be eliminated by topical lidocaine, a local anesthetic, or atropine, an autonomic cholinergic antagonist.

    “The EVG is reported (again without experimental details) not to be eliminated by topical lidocaine, a local anesthetic, or atropine, an autonomic cholinergic antagonist (Monti-Bloch et al., 1998b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Monti-Bloch et al., 1998b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Monti Bloch et al. have reported preliminary evidence that bipolar cells aspirated from the human VNO pit show electrical responses to some 'vomeropherins'.

    “As a second type of response, Monti Bloch et al. have also reported preliminary evidence that bipolar cells aspirated from the human VNO pit show an electrical responses to some 'vomeropherins' (Monti-Bloch et al., 1998b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Monti-Bloch et al., 1998b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The report that local anesthetics fail to block the EVG indicates that nerve transmission is not involved, which rules out CNS reflexes.

    “The report that local anesthetics fail to block the EVG indicates that nerve transmission is not involved, which rules out CNS reflexes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the menstrual synchronization effect appears chemosensory, there is no evidence that it is due to vomeronasal sensory input.

    “The substances involved are unknown and although the effect does appear to be chemosensory, there is no evidence that it is due to vomeronasal sensory input.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Other studies used a different type of stimulator which was not described in detail and for which there were no control experiments to determine stimulus spread.

    “Other studies (Berliner et al., 1996) used a different type of stimulator which was not described in detail and for which there were no control experiments to determine stimulus spread.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berliner et al., 1996 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These systemic responses include changes in blood pressure and heart rate, small but significant changes in hormonal levels, and some changes in mood.

    “These include changes in blood pressure and heart rate, small but significant changes in hormonal levels (Monti-Bloch et al., 1998a) and some changes in mood (Grosser et al., 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Monti-Bloch et al., 1998a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Grosser et al., 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The main olfactory system in general has good connections with cerebral cortex, but also has connections to the amygdala.

    “The main olfactory system in general has good connections with cerebral cortex, but also has connections to the amygdala.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    In cases where main olfactory input is the only important information on pheromones, it is unknown whether information about main olfactory pheromones has access to the cortex or is routed through the amygdala and basal forebrain.

    “However, in the cases where main olfactory input is the only important information on pheromones we still have no idea whether information about main olfactory pheromones has access to the cortex or is routed through the amygdala and basal forebrain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    These experiments have not been published in a fully refereed report.

    “These experiments have not been published in a fully refereed report.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    Subjects generally reported no sensation from direct chemical stimulation of the VNO, even when an EVG was recorded, but they reported an odor sensation when an EOG was elicited.

    “The subjects generally reported no sensation from direct chemical stimulation of the VNO, even when an EVG was recorded, but they reported an odor sensation when an EOG was elicited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Monti-Bloch et al. deduce a physiological connection with the brain because stimulus delivery to the VNO pit elicited several systemic responses.

    “Although no anatomical connection has been demon-strated, Monti-Bloch et al. deduce a physiological connection with the brain because stimulus delivery to the VNO pit elicited several systemic responses (Monti-Bloch and Grosser, 1991Grosser, , 1998a,b),b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Monti-Bloch and Grosser, 1991 source
    • cites Grosser, 1998a,b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Preti and Wysocki's conclusions are based on specific examples, but a similar conclusion would not be outrageous on basic principles.

    “Preti and Wysocki's conclusions are based on specific examples, but a similar conclusion would not be outrageous on basic principles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Priming pheromones produce a change of state in the receiver, usually a change in hormonal secretion that primes the animal for a later response.

    “Priming pheromones produce a change of state in the receiver, usually a change in hormonal secretion that primes the animal for a later response.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    We do not need to distinguish categorically between priming and signaling communications: both are essentially informational.

    “Perhaps we don't need to distinguish categorically between priming and signaling communications: both are essentially informational.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    One of the prime examples of main olfactory pheromones, nipple search behavior in rabbits, appears not to be learned, although the same response pattern can be conditioned to arbitrary odors.

    “Furthermore, one of the prime examples of main olfactory pheromones, nipple search behavior in rabbits, appears not to be learned, although the same response pattern can be conditioned to arbitrary odors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some benefit to the receiver in avoiding parasite transmission may be associated with avoidance of fecal odors, but a similar benefit with respect to general body odors is less likely, and a benefit to the sender in either case seems doubtful if no definite message is transmitted.

    “Some benefit to the receiver in avoiding parasite transmission may be associated with avoidance of fecal odors, but a similar benefit with respect to general body odors is less likely, and a benefit to the sender in either case seems doubtful if no definite message is transmitted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It may well be in both the ewe-lamb and Bruce effect cases that the learning involved is imprinting of a particular combination from a limited set of signals.

    “It may well be in both of these cases that the learning involved is imprinting of a particular combination from a limited set of signals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In the rabbit case, the chemical is not a pheromone although a response normally elicited by pheromonal communication has been linked to it by conditioning.

    “In this case the chemical is not a pheromone although a response normally elicited by pheromonal communication has been linked to it by conditioning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There are many biological chemicals that can be expected to evoke behavioral and mood changes.

    “There are many biological chemicals that can be expected to evoke behavioral and mood changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Inter-specific communication could be mutually beneficial, for example where chemosensory information about defense chemicals benefits the receiver by allowing avoidance.

    “Inter-specific communication could be mutually beneficial, for example where chemosensory information about defense chemicals benefits the receiver by allowing avoidance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Some responses, such as avoidance and disgust with fecal and body odors, may be culturally determined.

    “Some of these responses, such as avoidance and disgust with fecal and body odors, may be culturally determined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The essence of the pheromone concept is that a particular chemical or complex of chemicals communicates meaning and, thus, must be identified.

    “The essence of the concept is that a particular chemical or complex of chemicals communicates meaning and, thus, must be identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Releasing pheromones were originally considered to release a stereotyped behavioral pattern that required no further information for its completion.

    “The other class of pheromones, releasing pheromones, were originally considered to release a stereotyped behavioral pattern that required no further information for its completion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Chemical communication occurs in humans.

    “Chemical communication occurs in humans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The concept of releasing pheromones seemed inappropriate for mammals, where responses are often modified by experience or other contingencies, and behavioral responses are now said to be elicited by signaling pheromones.

    “This concept seemed inappropriate for mammals, where responses are often modified by experience or other contingencies, and behavioral responses are now said to be elicited by 'signaling' pheromones (Bronson, 1971(Bronson, , 1976;;Albone, 1984).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bronson, 1971
    • cites Bronson, 1976 source
    • cites Albone, 1984

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Identifying mutual benefit in a given case is not always easy, but the criterion provides a conceptual framework for understanding the establishment of a chemical communication.

    “Identifying mutual benefit in a given case is not always easy, but the criterion provides a conceptual framework for understanding the establishment of a chemical communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Too rigid a definition can make its applicability to real situations so limited that it is useless.

    “Too rigid a definition can make its applicability to real situations so limited that it is useless.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Odor communication between flowers and pollinating insects is mutually beneficial, but is not pheromonal because it occurs across species.

    “Odor communication between flowers and pollinating insects is mutually beneficial, but I would not label it pheromonal because it occurs across species, even though its evolutionary mechanisms may be similar to those maintaining intra-specific mutually beneficial communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The term pheromone was coined to describe a chemical substance which carries a message about the physiological or behavioral state of an insect to members of its own species, resulting in a specific reaction.

    “The term pheromone was coined to describe a chemical substance which carries a message about the physiological or behavioral state of an insect to members of its own species, resulting in 'a specific reaction, for example a definite behaviour or a developmental process' (Karlson and Luscher, 1959).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Karlson and Luscher, 1959 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These are not pheromone communications because they are not mutually beneficial and not intra-specific.

    “These are not pheromone communications because they are not mutually beneficial and not intra-specific.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The existence of a functional VNO in humans would not be ruled out either by the presence or the absence of pheromone communication in humans nor, if present, by any of its features, such as learned versus unlearned responses.

    “The existence of a functional VNO in humans would not be ruled out either by the presence or the absence of pheromone communication in humans nor, if present, by any of its features, such as learned versus unlearned responses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Too broad a definition devalues the term and also makes it useless.

    “Similarly, too broad a definition devalues the term and also makes it useless.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    It can be argued that there is no need for a special term for mutually beneficial chemical communication, but some distinction between communication and a casual use of chemosensory information does seem a useful distinction.

    “It can be argued (Beauchamp et al., 1976) that there is no need for a special term for mutually beneficial chemical communication, but, as emphasized by Karlson and Luscher (Karlson and Luscher, 1959), some distinction between communication and a casual use of chemosensory information does seem a useful distinction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beauchamp et al., 1976 source
    • cites Karlson and Luscher, 1959 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In humans, mood can affect future behavior (a sign of information transfer) and reliable biases in behavior could have evolutionary consequences.

    “We know that in humans mood can affect future behavior (a sign of information transfer) and reliable biases in behavior could have evolutionary consequences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Particular chemicals may be associated with particular objects, but there may be no necessity for the chemicals to be identified, and the associations can be reassigned.

    “Particular chemicals may be associated with particular objects, but there may be no necessity for the chemicals to be identified, and the associations can be reassigned.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A change of mood on exposure to a human-derived chemical does not adequately define a pheromone.

    “On the other hand, a change of mood on exposure to a human-derived chemical (Grosser et al., 2000;Jacob and McClintock, 2000) does not adequately define a pheromone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Grosser et al., 2000 source
    • cites Jacob and McClintock, 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There are other sensory systems that could be involved in chemical communication.

    “There are other sensory systems that could be involved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Preti and Wysocki concluded that there is evidence for priming pheromones in humans, including the data on menstrual cycle shifts, although the latter do not clearly meet the mutual benefit criterion proposed here.

    “They concluded that there is evidence for priming pheromones in humans, including the data on menstrual cycle shifts (although the latter do not clearly meet the mutual benefit criterion proposed here) (Preti and Wysocki, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Preti and Wysocki, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The mutual benefit requirement would require that the communication contributed to evolutionary fitness for both sender and receiver.

    “This would require that the communication contributed to evolutionary 'fitness' for both sender and receiver.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the presence of male stimuli, group housed females return to estrus cycling (the Whitten Effect), clearly a mutually beneficial response.

    “In the presence of male stimuli, group housed females return to estrus cycling (the 'Whitten Effect') (Whitten, 1959), clearly a mutually beneficial response.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Whitten, 1959

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There seems to be some advantage to arbitrarily limiting the term pheromone to intra-specific communication.

    “Nevertheless, there seems to be some advantage to our communication in arbitrarily limiting the term pheromone to intra-specific communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    It is clear in the original description, and in a later more extensive review of examples, that pheromone communication was to be real communication, beneficial to the sender and, by implication, to the receiver.

    “It is clear in the original description, and in a later more extensive review of examples (Karlson and Butenandt, 1959), that this was to be real communication, beneficial to the sender and, by implication, to the receiver.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Karlson and Luscher, 1959 source
    • cites Karlson and Butenandt, 1959 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This mechanism is less suitable for communication where the messages have special meanings.

    “This mechanism is less suitable for communication where the messages have special meanings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The response of newborn rabbits to the mother's nipple and the standing response of a receptive female pig to the male's pheromone both depend on the main olfactory system.

    “The response of newborn rabbits to the mother's nipple (Hudson and Distel, 1986), referred to above, and the standing response of a receptive female pig to the male's pheromone (Dorries et al., 1997) both depend on the main olfactory system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hudson and Distel, 1986 source
    • cites Dorries et al., 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If we concentrate on pheromone communication rather than pheromone chemicals, we avoid definitional problems associated with chemicals that have different meanings in different contexts or to different individuals.

    “Furthermore, if we concentrate on pheromone communication rather than pheromone chemicals, we avoid definitional problems associated with chemicals that have different meanings in different contexts or to different individuals, for example mature versus immature or male versus female.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    If the mutual benefit requirement is included as an explicit part of the definition, the application of the term pheromone becomes more restricted but more scientifically useful.

    “If this mutual benefit requirement is included as an explicit part of the definition (Rutowski, 1981;Meredith, 1983), the application of the term becomes more restricted but more scientifically useful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rutowski, 1981 source
    • cites Meredith, 1983 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Non-specialist functions of mammalian olfactory systems may involve a simple association between a complex of chemicals and an external situation, permitting later recognition of similar situations.

    “Non-specialist functions of mammalian olfactory systems may involve a simple association between a complex of chemicals and an external situation, permitting later recognition of similar situations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In cases where subordinate and dominant females are genetically related, there might be some increase in inclusive fitness.

    “In cases where the subordinate and dominant females are genetically related there might be some increase in inclusive fitness (inclusive fitness takes into account an individual's contribution to the reproductive success of related individuals that carry some of the same genes).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the case of puberty acceleration in mice, the mutual benefit is clear, and a good case can be made for many other priming pheromonal communications in mice.

    “In this case the mutual benefit is clear, and a good case can be made for many other priming pheromonal communications in mice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The authors did not mean that the individual organism created this capacity, but that it was established and maintained by natural selection.

    “We can be sure that the authors did not mean that the individual organism created this capacity, but that it was established and maintained by natural selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Preti and Wysocki did not find solid evidence for signaling pheromones but point out that mammalian, and especially human, behavior is influenced by many factors.

    “They did not find solid evidence for signaling pheromones but they point out that mammalian, and especially human, behavior is influenced by many factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Preti and Wysocki, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The fact that the same chemicals may be used by different species, whether or not in different combinations or different circumstances, is not a problem.

    “The fact that the same chemicals may be used by different species, whether or not in different combinations or different circumstances, is also not a problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Where a mutual advantage does not seem reasonable, communication is suspect.

    “Where a mutual advantage does not seem reasonable, communication is suspect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The recognition of a mate's pheromone signature in the pregnancy block or 'Bruce effect' in mice also appears to be learned, but this is a vomeronasal process.

    “The recognition of a mate's pheromone signature in the pregnancy block or 'Bruce effect' in mice also appears to be learned, but this is a vomeronasal process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many examples of a specific reaction to biological chemicals are excluded from the category of pheromone communications.

    “Many examples of 'a specific reaction' to biological chemicals are then excluded from the category of 'pheromone communications'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The mutual benefit criterion implies that meaning is not infinitely reassignable; that it is not just an association even though there are instances where arbitrary odors can be substituted for preprogrammed stimuli.

    “It does imply that meaning is not infinitely reassignable; that it is not just an association even though there are instances where arbitrary odors can be substituted for preprogrammed stimuli.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If there is no communication there seems no reason to use a special term.

    “If there is no communication there seems no reason to use a special term.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If we didn't have the positive evidence from EVG, autonomic and psychological responses, reasonable scientific judgment would assign the role of detecting human-derived chemicals that might be involved in chemical communication to the main olfactory system.

    “If we didn't have the positive evidence from EVG, autonomic and psychological responses, reasonable scientific judgment would assign the role of detecting human-derived chemicals that might be involved in chemical communication to the main olfactory system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The presence or absence of pheromones and pheromonal communication is independent of the existence and/or functionality of a human VNO.

    “The presence or absence of pheromones and pheromonal communication is independent of the existence and/or functionality of a human VNO.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ignoring the evidence for vomeronasal function because most of it comes with commercial baggage is not a rational scientific response in the absence of evidence for error, bias or fraud.

    “However, ignoring the evidence for vomeronasal function because most of it comes with commercial baggage is not a rational scientific response in the absence of evidence for error, bias or fraud.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The EVG constitutes evidence for a selective and sensitive response to human-derived chemicals located in the region of the VNO.

    “The EVG constitutes evidence for a selective and sensitive response to human-derived chemicals located in the region of the VNO.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The electrical and systemic responses recorded from the VNO region are not artifacts of electrode movement or leakage of stimuli to the olfactory area.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The expression of a vomeronasal-type receptor gene in humans raises the possibility that such genes may underlie chemosensitivity in the vomeronasal region.

    “The expression of a vomeronasal-type receptor gene in humans raises the possibility that such genes may underlie chemosensitivity in the vomeronasal region.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Systemic autonomic responses and emotional changes elicited by stimulation in the VNO region suggest some chemosensitivity, even though the anatomical substrate is difficult to demonstrate and seems unlikely to be conventional VSNs.

    “Systemic autonomic responses and emotional changes elicited by stimulation in this region suggest some chemosensitivity, even though the anatomical substrate is difficult to demonstrate and seems unlikely to be conventional VSNs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The electrical and systemic responses recorded from the VNO region are not artifacts of electrode movement or leakage of stimuli to the olfactory area.
108 of 108
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Whether vomeronasal systems in mammals have any similar non-social communication functions has not been thoroughly investigated.

    “Whether the vomeronasal systems in mammals have any similar non-social communication functions has not been thoroughly investigated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There has been a long-standing dispute over whether there is a VNO at all in adults.

    “In humans there has been a long-standing dispute over whether there is a VNO at all in adults.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The electrical and systemic responses recorded from the VNO region are not artifacts of electrode movement or leakage of stimuli to the olfactory area.

    “The local response is an artifact, albeit surprisingly dependent on the nature of the stimulus, perhaps because of electrode movement between stimulations.Alternatively, the response could be from non-chemosensory cells with no connections to the brain.Systemic responses could be due to leakage of stimuli to the olfactory area.”
3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]22. Getchell, T.V. and Getchell, M.L. (1987) Peripheral mechanims of olfaction: biochemistry and neurophysiology. In Finger, T. and Silver, W. (eds), Neurobiology of Taste and Smell. Wiley, New York, pp. 91-123.
  2. [63]63. Preti, G. and Wysocki, C.J. (1999) Human pheromones: releasers or primers: fact or myth. In Johnston, R.E., Muller-Schwartze, D. and Sorenson, P. (eds), Advances in Chemical Communication in Vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 315-331.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meredith, M.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Meredith, M.
Venue
Chemical Senses
Published
2001-05-01
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
433-445
ISSN
  • 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3553
OpenAlex
W2169483875
Cited by
280
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000906-06)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC00906)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Keywords
vomeronasal organ, pheromone communication, chemical communication, vomeronasal system, olfaction
MeSH terms
Animals, Chemotactic Factors, Electrophysiology, Epithelium, Humans, Pheromones, Vomeronasal Organ, Autocrine Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review