Cited by 1,071Astro and Planetary ScienceAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Protoplanet Migration by Nebula Tides

Ward, William R.·1997·Icarus

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/icar.1996.5647

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The net Lindblad torque tends to be inward.

    “The net Lindblad torque tends to be inward (Ward 1997; see also Armitage 2013 for a pedagogical overview of migration torques).”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Ward 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ward, W. R.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Ward, William R.
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-04
Volume
126
Issue
2
Pages
261-281
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006357369
Cited by
1,071
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 49
FWCI
9.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Icarus (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
protoplanet migration, angular momentum exchange, type I migration, type II migration, gap opening, orbital decay, orbital lifetime, planet formation, circumstellar disks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review