Cited by 152Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Orbital Migration of Neptune and Orbital Distribution of Trans‐Neptunian Objects

Open access
Ida, Shigeru, Bryden, Geoffrey, Lin, D. N. C., Tanaka, Hidekazu·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

A large number of trans-Neptunian objects are found to have orbits that are commensurate with the 3 : 2 mean-motion resonance of Neptune's orbit. These objects were probably captured into this resonant configuration when proto-Neptune migrated outward from its cradle. Up to now, only a few objects have been found at Neptune's 2 : 1 resonance (which is also a strong mean-motion resonance). This observed distribution of objects provides a strong constraint on the migration timescale and mechanism. With a series of numerical simulations, we show that Neptune would indeed trap objects onto its 3 : 2 resonance if it were to migrate outward over a timescale ≳10 6 yr. But in order to avoid the concurrent capture of objects onto its 2 : 1 resonance, Neptune's migration timescale must be ≲10 7 yr. Thus, the resonant capture process is likely to have occurred during the epoch of protoplanetary formation. We examine two potential mechanisms that are both compatible with the constraint set by the orbital distribution of trans-Neptunian objects. (1) In the cold outer regions of the gaseous solar nebula, proto-Neptune's tidal perturbation may have led to the formation of a gap near its orbit, the termination of its gas accretion, and the migration of its orbit along with the viscous expansion of the solar nebula on the timescale of ~10 6 -10 7 yr. This scenario is appealing because it can also naturally account for the limited amount of gas in Neptune's envelope. For self-consistency, we show that it is possible for proto-Neptune to acquire its core and envelope mass within the characteristic persistence timescale of protostellar disks (~10 6 -10 7 yr) with an inferred solid material/gas surface density comparable to/less than those of the minimum-mass nebula, respectively. (2) During its initial buildup, proto-Neptune's core not only collided and coagulated with residual planetesimals but also underwent close scatterings with large-angle deflection. We demonstrate with numerical simulations that such a process may lead to the expansion of its orbit over a few 10 6 yr. The asymmetrical planetesimal distribution that drives this migration is self-sustained by the planetesimal scatterings and the migration. In other words, the migration occurs without help of other giant planets, unlike the migration models of other authors (e.g., Fernandez & Ip; Hahn & Malhotra) which rely on planetesimal depletion due to ejection by the strong gravitational effects of proto-Jupiter and proto-Saturn. The main advantages of this alternative scenario are that (1) it provides a fresh replenishment of residual planetesimals into the feeding zone such that proto-Neptune may acquire a core more massive than the isolation mass within ~10 7 yr and (2) resonant trapping may lead to a natural termination of both proto-Neptune's planetesimal accretion and its orbital migration, determining its present core mass and position in a self-consistent manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/308720

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analytic and numerical calculations show that isolated planets migrate through the disk on a timescale much shorter than the disk lifetime.

    “Analytic and numerical calculations show that, in many cases, isolated planets migrate through the disk on a timescale much shorter than the disk lifetime”

    From MIGRATION OF SMALL MOONS IN SATURN's RINGS (2013) · cites this paper as Ida et al. 2000

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hubbard, W. B., Podolak, M., & Stevenson, D. J. 1995, in Neptune and Triton, ed. M. S. Matthews & A. M. Schumann (Tucson : Univ. Arizona Press), 109
  2. ÈÈÈ. 1985, in Protostars and Planets II, ed. D. C. Black & M. S. Matthew (Tucson : Univ. of Arizona Press), 981 ÈÈÈ. 1986, ApJ, 307, 395
  3. ÈÈÈ. 1993, in Protostars and Planets III, ed. E. H. Levy & J. I. Lunine (Tucson : Univ. of Arizona Press), 749
  4. Lissauer, J. J., Pollack, J. B., Wetherill, G. W., & Stevenson D. J. 1995, in Neptune and Triton, ed. M. S. Matthews & A. M. Schumann (Tucson : Univ. Arizona Press), 37
  5. E. J. 1951, Proc. R. Irish Acad., 54A, 165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ida, S., Bryden, G., Lin, D. N. C., & Tanaka, H.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-05
Volume
534
Issue
1
Pages
428-445
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2076469174
Cited by
152
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9618548, 9714275)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAG57515)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Ames Research Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
trans-Neptunian objects, mean motion resonance, 3:2 resonance, 2:1 resonance, resonance capture, protoplanetary disks, tidal perturbations, gas accretion, planetesimal scattering, giant planet formation, planetesimal disk, orbital distribution, solar nebula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review