Cited by 128Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsAstro and Planetary Science

The Explicit Planetary Isentropic-Coordinate (EPIC) Atmospheric Model

Open access
Dowling, T.E., Fischer, A.S., Gierasch, P.J., Harrington, J., LeBeau, R.P., Santori, C.M.·1998·Icarus

Abstract

We describe a new general circulation model (GCM) designed for planetary atmospheric studies called the EPIC model. This is a finite-difference model based on the isentropic-coordinate scheme of Hsu and Arakawa (1990.Mon. Wea. Rev.118, 1933–1959). We report on previously undocumented modifications, additions, and key practical issues that experience running the model has revealed to be important. The model integrates the hydrostatic primitive equations, which are valid for large-scale atmospheric dynamics and include gravity waves (buoyancy waves), planetary waves (Rossby waves), and horizontally propagating sound waves (Lamb waves), but not vertically propagating sound waves because of the hydrostatic approximation. The vertical coordinate is entropy in the form of potential temperature, which coincides with material surfaces for adiabatic motion. This means that there is no vertical velocity except where there is heating, which improves accuracy and helps the model maintain conservation properties over long integrations. An isentropic vertical coordinate is natural for the atmospheres of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, which are believed to have essentially adiabatic interiors that match up with the bottom of the model and is also excellent for middle-atmosphere studies on any planet. Radiative processes are parameterized by Newtonian cooling, and the latent heat of ortho–para hydrogen conversion is included when appropriate, with a suitably defined mean potential tem…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/icar.1998.5917

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dowling, T. E., Fischer, A. S., Gierasch, P. J., Harrington, J., LeBeau, R. P., & Santori, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-04
Volume
132
Issue
2
Pages
221-238
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082793303
Cited by
128
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Icarus (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
isentropic coordinates, global climate models, planetary atmospheres, hydrostatic primitive equations, potential temperature, adiabatic motion, ortho-para hydrogen conversion, Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune, meridional circulation, parallel computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review