Cited by 135Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeOrigins and Evolution of Life

Exobiological Implications of a Possible Ammonia–Water Ocean inside Titan

Fortes, A·2000·Icarus

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/icar.2000.6400

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Titan could have very early on possessed conditions favorable to the emergence of life and it cannot be discarded that this ocean may still harbor life today.

    “Thus, Titan could have very early on possessed conditions favorable to the emergence of life and it cannot be discarded that this ocean may still harbor life today (Fortes 2000).”

    From The Emergence of Life (2019) · cites this paper as Fortes 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fortes, A.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fortes, A
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
146
Issue
2
Pages
444-452
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055538564
Cited by
135
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Icarus (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
Keywords
Titan, subsurface ocean, astrobiology, prebiotic chemistry, biomarkers, Cassini mission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review