The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315799438 · Cited by 6,761
(2013) · Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_100431 · Cited by 4,799
User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b15703 · Cited by 3,132
Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey
Conklin (1987) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.1987.1663693 · Cited by 2,718
The structure of ill structured problems
Simon, H. A. (1973) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8 · Cited by 2,600
gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion
Conklin, J., & Begeman, M. L. (1988) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/58566.59297 · Cited by 1,088
Developments in design methodology
Cross, N. (1984) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 1,000
Cited by
Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: A ‘Cognitive Dimensions’ Framework
Green, T. R. G., & Petre, M. (1996) · Journal of Visual Languages & Computing · doi:10.1006/jvlc.1996.0009 · Cited by 1,251
Toward reference models for requirements traceability
Ramesh, B., & Jarke, M. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.895989 · Cited by 912
The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems
Chandrasegaran, S. K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R. D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R. F., & Gao, W. (2013) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006 · Cited by 667
Design rationale systems: understanding the issues
Lee, J. (1997) · IEEE Expert · doi:10.1109/64.592267 · Cited by 344
Rationale Management in Software Engineering
(2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30998-7 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Shum, S. B., & Hammond, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 603-652
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009578745
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 25.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1029
- The paper
- Shum, S. B., & Hammond, N. (1994). Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
