Cited by 6,761AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningCognitive Science and Education ResearchPsychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience

The Architecture of Cognition

Anderson, John R.·2013·Psychology Press eBooks

Abstract

Now available in paper, The Architecture of Cognition is a classic work that remains relevant to theory and research in cognitive science. The new version of Anderson's theory of cognitive architecture -- Adaptive Control of Thought (ACT*) -- is a theory of the basic principles of operation built into the cognitive system and is the main focus of the book.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315799438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, J. R.
Corresponding author
Anderson, John R.
Venue
Psychology Press eBooks
Published
2013-11-19
OpenAlex
W1708874574
Cited by
6,761
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 135 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 182 · 2014: 217 · 2013: 215 · 2012: 210
FWCI
93.50
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Keywords
cognitive architecture, ACT, ACT-R, cognitive science theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review