The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Context of Use within usability activities
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction
(1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-12113-x · Cited by 2,058
Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution
Whiteside, J., Bennett, J. L., & Holtzblatt, K. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-70536-5.50041-5 · Cited by 536
Usability measurement in context
BEVAN, N., & MACLEOD, M. (1994) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449299408914592 · Cited by 455
Usability—context, framework, definition, design and evaluation
Shackel, B. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 399
Human factors for informatics usability
(1992) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(92)90090-i · Cited by 354
Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT ’97
(1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9 · Cited by 173
Proceedings CHI 2008 conference
Rocchesso, D., & Serafin, S. (2008) · Human Factors in Computing Systems · Cited by 133
Ergonomics in design for usability
Shackel, B. (1986) · Cited by 125
Visual display terminals: Usability issues and health concerns
(1985) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(85)90019-5 · Cited by 104
Ross, T., & Burnett, G. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2001.0495 · Cited by 64
Usability context analysis: a practical guide
Thomas, C. N., & Bevan, N. (1996) · Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) · Cited by 62
Work with Computers: Organizational, Management, Stress and Health Aspects
Gough, T., Smith, M. J., Salvendy, G., Salvendy, G., & Smith, M. J. (1991) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2583388 · Cited by 47
Playback: A method for evaluating the usability of software and its documentation
Neal, A. S., & Simons, R. M. (1984) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.231.0082 · Cited by 41
Iterative Usability Testing of a Security Application
Karat, C.-M. (1989) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193128903300508 · Cited by 31
User-Centred Requirements Handbook
Maguire, M. C. (2010) · Cited by 22
Self-citationA Task-Tool Analysis of Manager-Computer Interaction
Eason, K. (1981) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-7586-9_12 · Cited by 19
The HUFIT planning analysis and specification toolset
Taylor, B. (1990) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · Cited by 18
The role of laboratory experiments in HCI: help, hindrance, or ho-hum?
Wolf, C. G., Carroll, J. M., Landauer, T. K., et al. (1989) · doi:10.1145/67449.67500 · Cited by 18
Usability engineering in office product development
Brooke, J. B. (1986) · Cited by 10
Selecting appropriate subjects for documentation usability testing
Rosenbaum, S. (1989) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · Cited by 2
Derbyshire, M., & Marsden, V. (1999) · Elderly Care · doi:10.7748/eldc.11.2.31.s28 · Cited by 1
Cited by
Methods to support human-centred design
MAGUIRE, M. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2001.0503 · Cited by 1,057
Self-citationUsability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model
Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013) · Journal of Interaction Science · doi:10.1186/2194-0827-1-1 · Cited by 736
Designing eHealth that Matters via a Multidisciplinary Requirements Development Approach
Van Velsen, L., Wentzel, J., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2013) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.2547 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- MAGUIRE, M.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- MAGUIRE, MARTIN
- ORCID
- MAGUIRE, MARTIN
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-483
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003554883
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Physical Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Persona Design and Applications
- Keywords
- context of use, usability, contextual analysis, user-centered design, user requirements, user interface design, prototype development, usability evaluation, non-expert users
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
